1,439
edits
Khattish: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Verb
m (→Phonotactics) |
m (→Verb) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
===Orthography=== | ===Orthography=== | ||
Formal Khattish uses [[w:Featural_alphabet|featural]] [[w:Abjad|abjad]] script Cekara shown above with its romanization. Diacritics are marked in educational materials and words out of context, sometimes in place names as well. The diacritics have evolved into elaborate decorations in the Razáfian calligraphy. | Formal Khattish uses [[w:Featural_alphabet|featural]] [[w:Abjad|abjad]] script Cekara shown above with its romanization. Diacritics are marked in educational materials and words out of context, sometimes in place names as well. Older systems indicated stress with "strong" diacritic dashes as opposed to dot-like "weak" diacritics. The diacritics have evolved into elaborate decorations in the Razáfian calligraphy. | ||
There is some controversy of the creator of Khattish script due to a great loss of historical records during the years under Western Tyranny of the sixth era: | There is some controversy of the creator of Khattish script due to a great loss of historical records during the years under Western Tyranny of the sixth era: | ||
Lightlisteners name shinesharer saint Gunda Tliwirshu as the designer, based on the remaining parts of his chronicles written on the island of Guard already in the third era, around 470. They claim that she had to create a translation of the Book of Light and even a new script "for those living in the darkness; poor natives to whom, alas, our beautiful language | Lightlisteners name shinesharer saint Gunda Tliwirshu as the designer, based on the remaining parts of his chronicles written on the island of Guard already in the third era, around 470. They claim that she had to create a translation of the Book of Light and even a new script "for those living in the darkness; poor natives to whom, alas, our beautiful language [Rinapri] is nothing but birds' singing". | ||
Since the language has changed much during these millennia, supporters of the Lafan school believe that the script was coined in 4th era around year 400 by Narrif Tsero, one of the most productive Khat linguists, who used Kher and Northern runic scripts (not used anymore) as the base. The new script managed to spread just in time before the decline of Khat culture and was finally revived after the of the collapse of Western Tyranny in the sixth era more than two thousand years later by Teke Kále. Much later, in the seventh era 290, the founder of New Khat Empire, Sekkute I, used the script as a national romantic example of pure Khattish culture, not contaminated by this Westlang. | Since the language has changed much during these millennia, supporters of the Lafan school believe that the script was coined in 4th era around year 400 by Narrif Tsero, one of the most productive Khat linguists, who used Kher and Northern runic scripts (not used anymore) as the base. The new script managed to spread just in time before the decline of Khat culture and was finally revived after the of the collapse of Western Tyranny in the sixth era more than two thousand years later by Teke Kále. Much later, in the seventh era 290, the founder of New Khat Empire, Sekkute I, used the script as a national romantic example of pure Khattish culture, not contaminated by this Westlang. | ||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
==Morphology== | ==Morphology== | ||
*roots slightly similar to [[w:Semitic_root|semitic roots]]: voiceless bi- and | *roots slightly similar to [[w:Semitic_root|semitic roots]]: voiceless bi- and triliterals (while Kher have only quadriliteral roots) | ||
**voiceless→voiced & ejective→affricate & voiced→approximant as one derivation process: √p-p → ''b-p'' and ''p-b'' | **voiceless→voiced & ejective→affricate & voiced→approximant as one derivation process: √p-p → ''b-p'' and ''p-b'' | ||
**derivation with affixes as well | **derivation with affixes as well | ||
| Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
===Verb=== | ===Verb=== | ||
*conjugated for number, tense, | *partially conjugated for subject/object person & number (1SG, 1PL) | ||
*apophony | *rather small set of auxiliary clitics for tense & aspect | ||
** developed similarly to Sanskrit participial periphrastic phrases | |||
**"he cat see-touch" (he is watching a cat), "he dog see-leave" (he saw a dog), "he horse see-meet" (he will see a horse) | |||
*apophony for negation | |||
*first consonant voicing for subjunctive mood | *first consonant voicing for subjunctive mood | ||
*stress changes for other moods | |||
===Adposition=== | ===Adposition=== | ||
| Line 210: | Line 213: | ||
==Syntax== | ==Syntax== | ||
ergative-absolutive alignment, word order | ergative-absolutive alignment, word order SV, AOV, OAV or O<sub>1</sub>AO<sub>2</sub>V (verb-final), head-medial | ||
Antipassive construction uses SV(O) | |||
[[Category:Ideas]] | [[Category:Ideas]] | ||