Template talk:ISO/doc: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fauxlosophe (talk | contribs) (Created page with "We might want to move this to the forum to recommend it to more people. It's an unofficial project, so the more people who are aware of it, the more validity and value it hold...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Attention== | |||
We might want to move this to the forum to recommend it to more people. It's an unofficial project, so the more people who are aware of it, the more validity and value it holds. I might consider showing it around as well to other conlangers if it seems a wise course of action. On major detriment is that there are a few dead/disappeared conlangs on the list; I tried to contact the owner in regards to these deadlinks but I've gotten no reply. | We might want to move this to the forum to recommend it to more people. It's an unofficial project, so the more people who are aware of it, the more validity and value it holds. I might consider showing it around as well to other conlangers if it seems a wise course of action. On major detriment is that there are a few dead/disappeared conlangs on the list; I tried to contact the owner in regards to these deadlinks but I've gotten no reply. | ||
-Cheers, [[User:Fauxlosophe|Fauxlosophe]] ([[User talk:Fauxlosophe|talk]]) 17:53, 30 May 2013 (CEST) | -Cheers, [[User:Fauxlosophe|Fauxlosophe]] ([[User talk:Fauxlosophe|talk]]) 17:53, 30 May 2013 (CEST) | ||
I Think Chrys is the most involved one on the matter. We might put it up as a notice for awhile, or write a small article on it. If you wish, please make a Canto-thread on it. | |||
Sincerely, [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 20:29, 30 May 2013 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:29, 30 May 2013
Attention
We might want to move this to the forum to recommend it to more people. It's an unofficial project, so the more people who are aware of it, the more validity and value it holds. I might consider showing it around as well to other conlangers if it seems a wise course of action. On major detriment is that there are a few dead/disappeared conlangs on the list; I tried to contact the owner in regards to these deadlinks but I've gotten no reply.
-Cheers, Fauxlosophe (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2013 (CEST)
I Think Chrys is the most involved one on the matter. We might put it up as a notice for awhile, or write a small article on it. If you wish, please make a Canto-thread on it.
Sincerely, 
Waahlis 20:29, 30 May 2013 (CEST)