User talk:Zev: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
As it happens, there's not very many of us. ^^ The favicon is being updated right now, but thank you! Well, all contributions are welcome, of course. Bring it to the forum Tavern, and we'll take a look at the suggestions. :) Concerning the Contionary, there is little agreement whether to do it like Wiktionary or not. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 21:41, 17 August 2013 (CEST) | As it happens, there's not very many of us. ^^ The favicon is being updated right now, but thank you! Well, all contributions are welcome, of course. Bring it to the forum Tavern, and we'll take a look at the suggestions. :) Concerning the Contionary, there is little agreement whether to do it like Wiktionary or not. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 21:41, 17 August 2013 (CEST) | ||
:Hmm. Standardisation and templatisation are in my mind necessary, as only thus can changes be made instantaneously across the entire wiki (as by editing a template or running a bot). But with a small and disorederly horde of conlangers, such cannot be expected, I suppose. [[User:Zev|Zev]] ([[User talk:Zev|talk]]) 00:01, 18 August 2013 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 22:01, 17 August 2013
Welcome!
Welcome to Linguifex! I saw Chrysophylax added you manually as well? :)I don't think I need to introduce the concepts of conlangs! Welcome yet again to the wiki and the community! If there's is something you need, or do not understand, just shout for one of the admins! Sincerely, 
Waahlis 18:32, 17 August 2013 (CEST)
- Thankee sir. One thing I noticed is that you guys seem not to have much infrastructure. By infrastructure I mean everything from having a favicon to actually having templates to support the Contionary rather than faking it all so that it looks like an imitation of Wiktionary. Are you interested in expanding that kind of thing? Zev (talk) 21:02, 17 August 2013 (CEST)
As it happens, there's not very many of us. ^^ The favicon is being updated right now, but thank you! Well, all contributions are welcome, of course. Bring it to the forum Tavern, and we'll take a look at the suggestions. :) Concerning the Contionary, there is little agreement whether to do it like Wiktionary or not. Waahlis 21:41, 17 August 2013 (CEST)
- Hmm. Standardisation and templatisation are in my mind necessary, as only thus can changes be made instantaneously across the entire wiki (as by editing a template or running a bot). But with a small and disorederly horde of conlangers, such cannot be expected, I suppose. Zev (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2013 (CEST)