Chlouvānem/Morphology: Difference between revisions

Chlouvānem/Morphology (view source)

1 byte removed , 17 July 2018

m

8,575

edits

@@ Line 1,047: / Line 1,047: @@
 These verbs all have their cause in the exessive case (or a subjunctive verb) and the affected being in the dative; ''gårḍake'' usually only has a subjunctive. Examples:
-: ''loh tamyāt maivat hæltek'' “what (s)he said <small>(literally: his/her word)</small> moved me.”
+: ''lum tamyāt maivat hæltek'' “what (s)he said <small>(literally: his/her word)</small> moved me.”
-: ''nīdrēta loh ñæṃħē'' “I’m sorry for how I behaved.”
+: ''nīdrēta lum ñæṃħē'' “I’m sorry for how I behaved.”
-: ''sęi nanau pryūsimęlyati gårḍek'' “you were meant to give it back to me” (literally: it was meant that you give it back to me<ref>Note that in such a phrase the perfective subjunctive would have a different meaning, namely “to have already given it back to me”.</ref>) .
+: ''sę nanau pryūsimęlyati gårḍek'' “you were meant to give it back to me” (literally: it was meant that you give it back to me<ref>Note that in such a phrase the perfective subjunctive would have a different meaning, namely “to have already given it back to me”.</ref>) .
 Derived forms usually behave as impersonal too, like ''taprābake'' (to hate) — e.g. ''taprāblelyom taprābiṣya'' "haters gonna hate".