Alpatho-Hirtic languages: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 89: Line 89:
*different roots for some positive and negative verbs (like East Carpathian ''šammet/ehčet'' "to see"/"not to see")
*different roots for some positive and negative verbs (like East Carpathian ''šammet/ehčet'' "to see"/"not to see")
*use of possessive suffixes, expressing possession via genitive
*use of possessive suffixes, expressing possession via genitive
*several plural (and dual for Hirtya) markers, like -j (-i), -k, -n/-ng. In Carpatian however only a few words have other markers than -k
*several plural (and dual for Hirtya) markers, like -j (-i), -k, -n/-ng. In Carpathian however only a few words have other markers than -k
*the concepts like "to be", "to have", "to do", "to wish" and some others are represented by suffixes attached to an object of a sentence
*the concepts like "to be", "to have", "to do", "to wish" and some others are represented by suffixes attached to an object of a sentence
*nouns, used with a numeral, are singular if they refer to things which form a single group (Vaand ''gou jies'' ("three years", literally "three year")
*nouns, used with a numeral, are singular if they refer to things which form a single group (Vaand ''gou jies'' ("three years", literally "three year")
2,334

edits

Navigation menu