2,334
edits
Ruthenian: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Late Old Ruthenian
m (→Example) |
|||
| Line 343: | Line 343: | ||
====Late Old Ruthenian==== | ====Late Old Ruthenian==== | ||
This is the time, when Ruthenian became distinct from Ukrainian and Belarusian, developing its unique features. | This is the time, when Ruthenian became distinct from Ukrainian and Belarusian, developing its unique features. | ||
#The contraction happened at the end of words. Sequences of VjV, where V is a vowel, merged into one long vowel, i.e. *dòbroje → dòbrē "good", *žitije → žyťē "life", * | #The contraction happened at the end of words. Sequences of VjV, where V is a vowel, merged into one long vowel, i.e. *dòbroje → dòbrē "good", *žitije → žyťē "life", *majeť "s/he has" → mā. This process was similar to the one in West Slavic languages, but it happened much later (around the XVIth century) and did not spread on all such sequences, but just the word-final ones. | ||
#The merge between *y and *i, which both became pronounced [ɪ] (*rỳba "fish" and *šîdlo "awl" became rỳba and szỳdlo. The *dl cluster typically preserved in Ruthenian, but simplified in both Belarusian and Ukrainian - szyla and szylo respectively). This process did not occure in the Hucul and Dolynian dialects, instead *i simply became /ɪ/ while *y remained distinct (either as [ɨ] or [ɤ]). | #The merge between *y and *i, which both became pronounced [ɪ] (*rỳba "fish" and *šîdlo "awl" became rỳba and szỳdlo. The *dl cluster typically preserved in Ruthenian, but simplified in both Belarusian and Ukrainian - szyla and szylo respectively). This process did not occure in the Hucul and Dolynian dialects, instead *i simply became /ɪ/ while *y remained distinct (either as [ɨ] or [ɤ]). | ||
#The debuccalization of /ɣ/ to /ɦ/ had occured by the XVIIth century. Its voiceless counterpart [x] did not loose its frication completely, but later allophonically changed into /h/ before voiceless plosives. | #The debuccalization of /ɣ/ to /ɦ/ had occured by the XVIIth century. Its voiceless counterpart [x] did not loose its frication completely, but later allophonically changed into /h/ before voiceless plosives. | ||
| Line 350: | Line 350: | ||
#[[w:Prothesis (linguistics)|Prothesis]] ocurred before vowels word-initially. The protetic consonant was either *w or *j depending on the vowel quality: *īsty "to eat" became jisty, *ōkno "window" became *wokno. The process usually applied to long vowels. | #[[w:Prothesis (linguistics)|Prothesis]] ocurred before vowels word-initially. The protetic consonant was either *w or *j depending on the vowel quality: *īsty "to eat" became jisty, *ōkno "window" became *wokno. The process usually applied to long vowels. | ||
#The rising and fronting of *ō to *ü: *wōkno "window" → *wükno. The changed was attested in the XVIIIth and XIXth centuries writings. The new phoneme *ü also developed from earlier *ie after *r: *striecza "meeting" → strücza, which is still pronounced this way in Dolinian Ruthenian dialects. In other dialects *ü became pronounced /i/: *nücz "night" → nicz. | #The rising and fronting of *ō to *ü: *wōkno "window" → *wükno. The changed was attested in the XVIIIth and XIXth centuries writings. The new phoneme *ü also developed from earlier *ie after *r: *striecza "meeting" → strücza, which is still pronounced this way in Dolinian Ruthenian dialects. In other dialects *ü became pronounced /i/: *nücz "night" → nicz. | ||
====Modern Ruthenian==== | ====Modern Ruthenian==== | ||
#The /rʲ/ sound depalatalized to a plain /r/ in most dialects. In western dialects it gave a /rj/ sequence while in Hucul dialect it remained /rʲ/ before front vowels and became /r/ elsewhere. | #The /rʲ/ sound depalatalized to a plain /r/ in most dialects. In western dialects it gave a /rj/ sequence while in Hucul dialect it remained /rʲ/ before front vowels and became /r/ elsewhere. | ||