Kämpya: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Kämpya (view source)

Revision as of 14:20, 5 December 2019

30,026 bytes added ,  5 December 2019
m
Categories.
m (Categories.)
 
(150 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Kämpya is spoken is my far-future Antarctican conworld, where runaway global warming has melted the icecaps and made the continent habitable (while rendering most of the rest of the world uninhabitable).
Kämpya is spoken is my far-future Antarctican conworld, where runaway global warming has melted the icecaps and made the continent habitable (while rendering most of the rest of the world uninhabitable).


It originated from the area around Ross Island, one of the first large-scale colonies on Antarctica. The founders of the settlement were mostly either Burmese, Australian or Taiwanese, and as such Kämpya is most heavily influenced by the languages of those countries (especially Burmese). However, a later wave of Spanish speaking migrants from South America also had a large impact on the language.
It originated from the area around Ross Island, one of the first large-scale colonies on Antarctica. Many of the founders were from a number of East Asian countries, and used English as a common language while bringing their own languages with them. However the community was isolated, and within a few generations their English had developed into a creole, influenced by a number of languages, especially Burmese, Minnan Chinese, and Japanese (spoken in countries where many of them fled from). Most notably, the language became postpositional (English prepositions were replaced with Burmese postpositions). A wave of Spanish speaking migrants also heavily affected the language.


It has since spread to other parts of the continent, aided by the spread of a religion called Laikyâr (although far from all Kämpya speakers follow the Laikyâr religion). Indeed there is a special register of the language that is only used in religious contexts. There are also a number of regional dialects. However, this page describes what could be termed the "standard" dialect.
It then diverged into a number of widely divergent dialects (technology regressed, and groups of speakers were cut off from one another), followed by another period of koineisation when enough technology was re-invented for speakers of different dialects to be able to contact one other again. This koine was called Kämpya, and spread to many other parts of the continent, aided by the growth of a religion called Laikyâr (although not all Kämpya speakers follow the Laikyâr religion, and not all Laikyâr believers speak Kämpya). Indeed there is a special register of the language that is only used in religious contexts. There are also a number of regional dialects. However, this page describes what could be termed the "standard" dialect.




==Brief Description==
==Brief Description==


Kämpya has topic comment syntax with isolating morphology. The syntactic alignment is basically ergative, except that there is a tripartite system on pronouns. However, genitive (alienable) and ergative pronouns are identical. Possessors are marked for alienability [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alienable_possession] using tone, and come before the nouns they modify. Kämpya (at least in the standard dialect) uses postpositions rather than prepositions, and adjectives can come either before or after the nouns they modify if they are restrictive or non-restrictive respectively [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictiveness].
Kämpya has topic comment syntax with isolating morphology. The morphosyntactic alignment is basically ergative, except that there is a tripartite system on pronouns. However, genitive (alienable) and ergative pronouns are identical. Possessors are marked for alienability [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alienable_possession] using tone, and come before the nouns they modify. Kämpya (at least in the standard dialect) uses postpositions rather than prepositions, and adjectives can come either before or after the nouns they modify if they are restrictive or non-restrictive respectively [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictiveness].
 
Verbs do not inflect for agreement, tense or aspect, however there is an elaborate system of particles that indicate mood / evidentiality.


In terms of phonology, the most notable thing is a 3-way vowel phonation contrast on stressed syllables (which is not present on unstressed syllables). Kämpya distinguishes words with harsh voice (marked with a tilde e.g. /a̰/), from breathy voice (marked with a pair of dots either above or below the vowel e.g. /a̤/ or /ä/), from glottalisation (marked with a glottal stop after the vowel e.g. /aʔ/.
In terms of phonology, the most notable thing is a 3-way vowel phonation contrast on stressed syllables (which is not present on unstressed syllables). Kämpya distinguishes words with harsh voice (marked with a tilde e.g. /a̰/), from breathy voice (marked with a pair of dots either above or below the vowel e.g. /a̤/ or /ä/), from glottalisation (marked with a glottal stop after the vowel e.g. /aʔ/.


There are many minimal pairs of words that only contrast stress and phonation e.g. /síˈtâ̰/ - "wing" vs. /ˈsíʔtà/ - "guardian" vs. /ˈsì̤tà/ - "sister", or /áˈlôṵn/ - "that which is alone" vs. /áˈlòṳn/ - "everything / everyone".
There are many minimal pairs of words that only contrast phonation e.g. /kʰà̤ɾ/ - "plaster cast", /kʰâ̰ɾ/ - "card", /kʰáʔɾ/ - "a cart" (the differences in tone can be predicted from the phonation).
 
In addition to this, there is also a tone contrast, but this is only used for grammatical purposes (e.g. to change between different parts of speech, or to mark alienable / inalienable possession), never for lexical purposes. For example, from the noun /áˈlâṵn/ - "that which is alone", which has High Tone on the first syllable and Falling Tone on the second (with harsh voice), we can derive the non-restrictive adjective /àˈláṵn/ - "by itself / solitary", which has Low Tone on the first syllable and High Tone on the second (with harsh voice).
 
 
==Typological Influences==
 
The contrast between alienable and inalienable possession was not present in any of the major languages of the initial settlers. However it has developed into an areal feature and is now found in most of the languages on the continent.
 
A similar situation happened with evidentiality, although its spread is much more restricted, only being found in the languages spoken along the Ross Sea coast. In this area, high mountains and long fjords meant that people lived in small, isolated communities. In such communities, where everyone knew one another, gossip could be highly destructive. This context favoured the development of evidentiality.
 
The lack of marking for number and tense / aspect  is common in Antarctican languages from areas where a large portion of the founding population spoke Mainland East / SE Asian languages (which lack these features).
 
Topic-comment and wh-in-situ word order came into Kämpya through similar means (it is very common in East and SE Asia).
 
Ergativity came into Antarctica from speakers of Austronesian languages from Eastern Indonesia, the Pacific and the Philippines, three areas which were among the first to be severely affected by climate change, and therefore among the first migrants to the south. some degree of ergativity is a continent-wide areal feature. In the case of Kämpya, the English possessive 's began to be used to mark ergative subjects. By analogy, possessive pronouns then began to be used as ergative pronouns e.g. /jó/ - 2PS.ERG from English "your". Later, a different suffix /ji/ began to be used to mark possession.
 
Clusivity also spread throughout Antarctica by similar means, although many languages (including Kämpya) ended up conflating the first person singular and the first person exclusive plural.
 
Applicative constructions also entered Kämpya through influence from Austronesian languages such as Tagalog. However they did not spread as widely throughout the continent.
 
Marking pronouns with pre-verbal clitics originated in Spanish (indeed Kämpya's accusative pronouns are borrowed from Spanish). This has spread across Antarctica as an areal feature (except that in some languages, they are prefixes rather than clitics).
 
The vast majority of the founders spoke pro-drop languages (Burmese, Spanish, Chinese, Japanese etc.) so it is perhaps no surprise that Kämpya has become pro-drop (apart from the pre-verbal clitics).
 
Kämpya borrowed a number of its postpositions from Burmese e.g. locative /ka/. Other postpositions were originally English prepositions, but switched to be postpositions under the influence of languages such as Burmese and Japanese.
 
Placing postpositional phrases before the verb was borrowed from Chinese (perhaps also helped by the fact that many other founders spoke verb-final languages such as Burmese and Japanese).
 
Anti-logophoricity is an areal feature that developed along the Ross Sea coast after settlement.
 
Marking restrictiveness on adjectives by word order originated in Spanish, but became more extensive after settlement. Marking restrictiveness on adjectives (in some way, not necessarily by word order) is an Antarctic areal feature.
 
The complicated demonstrative system (depending on whether the object is uphill or downhill from the speaker) is an areal feature of the Ross Sea coast. Like most of the areas where such a system has developed, this area is very mountainous.


In addition to this, there is also a tone contrast, but this is only used for grammatical purposes (e.g. to change between different parts of speech, or to mark alienable / inalienable possession), never for lexical purposes. For example, from the nouns /síˈtâ̰/ - "wing" and /áˈlôṵn/ - "that which is alone", which both have High Tone on the first syllable and Low Tone on the second (with harsh voice), we can derive the non-restrictive adjectives /sìˈtá̰/ - "wing" and /àˈlóṵn/ - "by itself / solitary", which both have Low Tone on the first syllable and High Tone on the second (with harsh voice).
Using a separate verb for locational predication (in the case of Kämpya /éʔ/, which is cognate to English "at") is an areal feature of East and SE Asia.


It is usually written using a script based on the Burmese alphabet.
Using a postposition to form a comparative construction is another areal feature of Asia which has found its way into Kämpya.




Line 62: Line 97:


# /b/, /d/ and /g/ are often pronounced as slightly implosive.
# /b/, /d/ and /g/ are often pronounced as slightly implosive.
# [ɬ] corresponds to Burmese */l̥/, and English */sl/. It is underlyingly /hl/.
# [ɬ] is underlyingly /hl/.
# [ç] is underlyingly /hj/.
# [ç] is underlyingly /hj/.
# [ʍ] is underlyingly /hw/.
# [ʍ] is underlyingly /hw/.
Line 81: Line 116:


In stressed syllables, codas can also be /ⱱ/, /ɾ/ or /h/, as long as the vowel is a monophthong and not a diphthong.
In stressed syllables, codas can also be /ⱱ/, /ɾ/ or /h/, as long as the vowel is a monophthong and not a diphthong.
/ŋ/ cannot occur word-initially.




===Consonant Neutralisations===
===Consonant Neutralisations===


Voicing and aspiration distinctions are neutralised in syllable codas, though they are still present underlyingly e.g. /sjúˈðâ̰d/ - "city" is pronounced [sjúˈðâ̰t], but when combined with the genitive clitic /jà/ to form /sjúˈðâ̰djà/ - "of the city (alienable)", it is pronounced [sjúˈðâ̰djà].
In colloquial speech, stops in the codas of unstressed syllables are debuccalised to glottal stops e.g. the city named /ˈkʰóʔnàt/ is often pronounced [ˈkʰóʔnàʔ], /ˈpʰḛ̂jòd/ - "fjord" is pronounced [ˈpʰḛ̂ːjòʔ].
 
In colloquial speech, stops in the codas of unstressed syllables are debuccalised to glottal stops e.g. the city named /ˈkʰóʔnàt/ is often pronounced [ˈkʰóʔnàʔ].


If a nasal coda occurs before /h/, an approximant, or at the end of a word, it is simply pronounced as nasalisation of the preceding vowel e.g. /áˈlòṳn/ - "everyone" is pronounced [áˈlòṳⁿ]. But likewise it is still present underlyingly, as can be seen when combined with the dative clitic /àuŋ/ to form /áˈlòṳnàuŋ/ - "to everyone", which is pronounced [áˈlòṳnàuŋ].
If a nasal coda occurs before /h/, an approximant, or at the end of a word, it is often pronounced as nasalisation of the preceding vowel e.g. /nâḭm/ - "name" is pronounced [nâḭⁿ]. But likewise it is still present underlyingly, as can be seen when combined with the alienable genitive clitic /jì/ to form /nâḭm=jì/ - "of the name", which is pronounced [nâḭmjì].


===Stress and Phonation===
===Stress and Phonation===
Line 99: Line 134:
Between two vowels, /h/ is voiced to [ɦ] e.g. /máháˈkáʔp/ - "eternity" is pronounced /máɦáˈkáʔp/
Between two vowels, /h/ is voiced to [ɦ] e.g. /máháˈkáʔp/ - "eternity" is pronounced /máɦáˈkáʔp/


/h/ can occur in the coda of stressed syllables. It's realisation depends on the phonation of the previous vowel, but is always pharyngeal.
/h/ can occur in the coda of stressed syllables. It's realisation depends on the phonation of the previous vowel.
 
If the stressed vowel has breathy phonation, the /h/ manifests itself as a pharyngeal fricative [ħ] e.g. /à̤h/ - "question" is pronounced [à̤ħ]. Compare /ŋà̤/ - "fish" which is pronounced [ŋà̤].
 
If the stressed vowel has glottalised phonation, the /h/ manifests itself as a pharyngeal stop [ʡ] e.g. /dáʔh/ - "darkness" is pronounced [dáʡ]. Compare /táʔ/ - "a wish" (in a nostalgic context) which is pronounced with a glottal stop [táʔ].


/h/ never occurs after vowels with harsh phonation.
If the stressed vowel has breathy phonation, the /h/ manifests itself as a breathy voiced fricative [ɦ] e.g. /à̤h/ - "question" is pronounced [à̤ɦ]. Compare /gwà̤/ - "grass" which is pronounced [gwà̤].


Of course, if a process such a cliticisation (e.g. with the genitive clitic /jà/ or the dative clitic /àuŋ/), means that the /h/ is no longer in coda position, then these process do not occur e.g.
If the stressed vowel has glottalised phonation, the /h/ manifests itself as an epiglottal stop [ʡ] e.g. /dáʔh/ - "darkness" is pronounced [dáʡ].


/à̤h jà/ - "of the question (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈà̤çà] (/hj/ assimilates to [ç]).
If /h/ occurs after vowels with harsh phonation, it is pronounced as a voiced epiglottal fricative [ʢ] e.g. /zwéˈmâ̰h/ - "to report", is pronounced [zwéˈmâ̰ʢ].


/dáʔh jà/ - "of the darkness (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈdáʔçà].
Of course, if a process such a cliticisation (e.g. with the genitive clitic /ji/), means that the /h/ is no longer in coda position, then these processes do not occur e.g.


/à̤h àuŋ/ - "to the question" is pronounced [ˈà̤ɦàuⁿ].
/à̤h=jì/ - "of the question (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈà̤çì] (/hj/ assimilates to [ç]).


/dáʔh àuŋ/ - "to the darkness" is pronounced [ˈdáʔhàuⁿ].
/dáʔh=jì/ - "of the darkness (alienable)" is pronounced [ˈdáʔçì].




Line 132: Line 163:


'''Class 2'''
'''Class 2'''
This is used for nouns in postpositional phrases, inalienable possessors, nouns used attributively, restrictive adjectives (modifying a noun), and verbs used in compounds.
This is used for nouns in postpositional phrases, inalienable possessors, nouns used attributively, restrictive adjectives (modifying a noun), and infinitive verbs.


'''Class 3'''
'''Class 3'''
Line 175: Line 206:
| Kämpya || ˈkà̤mpjà || ˈkà̤mpjá || ˈkǎ̤mpjà
| Kämpya || ˈkà̤mpjà || ˈkà̤mpjá || ˈkǎ̤mpjà
|-
|-
| wing || síˈtâ̰ || síˈtà̰ || sìˈtá̰
| guardian || ˈsʰíʔtà || ˈsʰìʔtá || ˈsʰíʔtà
|-
| guardian || ˈsíʔtà || ˈsìʔtá || ˈsíʔtà
|-
|-
| sister || ˈsì̤tà || ˈsì̤tá || ˈsǐ̤tà
| sister || ˈsʰì̤tà || ˈsʰì̤tá || ˈsʰǐ̤tà
|-
|-
| alone || áˈlôṵn || áˈlòṵn || àˈlóṵn
| alone || áˈlâṵn || áˈlàṵn || àˈláṵn
|-
|-
| alone + Genitive clitic /ja/ || áˈlôṵnjà || áˈlòṵnjá || àˈlóṵnjà
| alone + Genitive clitic /ji/ || áˈlâṵn=jì || áˈlàṵn=jí || àˈláṵn=jì
|-
|-
| all || áˈlòṳn || áˈlòṳn || àˈlǒṳn
| question || à̤h || à̤h || ǎ̤h
|-
|-
| all + Genitive clitic /ja/ || áˈlòṳnjà || áˈlòṳnjá || àˈlǒṳnjà
| question + Genitive clitic /ja/ || à̤h=jì || à̤h=jí || ǎ̤h=jì
|}
|}
===Sound Correspondences with English===
====Phonation====
Contrastive phonation developed on stressed vowels depending on the following consonants. Breathy phonation emerged via a sound change where voiceless fricatives were lost after a stressed vowel e.g. /ˈsʰì̤tà/ - "sister". Glottalised phonation developed whenever there was a voiceless stop after a stressed vowel e.g. /áʔp/ - "rise" (from English "up". In other cases (e.g. when there was a voiced stop after a stressed vowel) the syllable received harsh phonation.
====Consonants====
Aspiration on stops became phonemic. Stops were generally unaspirated, except word initial stops and stops beginning a stressed syllable. However, if the stop was preceded by an obstruent (usually /s/), it became unaspirated and the /s/ was deleted e.g. /tóʔp/ - "stop" vs. /tʰáp/ - "above" (from English "top")
/s/ acquired phonemic aspiration in similar situations to the above e.g. /sʰḛ̂n/ - "heaven" (from English "ascend") vs. /èˈsóʔt/ - "exotic.DESC" (the /k/ that used to precede the /s/ was lost, but not before blocking that aspiration that would otherwise have occurred on an /s/ in a stressed syllable).
Clusters of /s/ + Nasal became voiceless nasals e.g. /n̥âṵ/ - "snow", /m̥òṵ/ - "small.RESTR".
/sl/ clusters usually became /hl/, which is pronounced [ɬ] e.g. /hléʔp/ - "slap".
/ʍ/ re-emerged in English via spelling pronunciations, becoming Kämpya /hw/ (pronounced as [ʍ]) e.g. /ˈhwâ̰jù/ - "whale".
English /f/ became /pʰ/ e.g. /ˈpʰḛ̂jòd/ - "fjord". The exception to this was when it was clustered with /r/, in which case it became /hw/ e.g. /hwám/ - "from".
English /v/ became /bw/ before a vowel e.g. /ˈbwḛ̂lì/ - "valley"
English /r/ became either /w/ or /zw/ e.g. /ˈzwéʔp/ - quickly (from English "rapid"), /ˈpʰò̤wè/ - "forest".
English post-alveolar consonants became sequences of alveolar consonants + /j/ e.g. /báˈsjàʔp/- "beat" (from English "bash up")
Lenition occurred of obstruents after historically long vowels (Kämpya lost its phonemic vowel length contrast). Labial obstruents lenited to /ⱱ/ e.g. /pʰ/, /p/, /b/, /f/, /v/ became /ⱱ/ e.g. /là̤ⱱ/ - "laugh". Coronal consonants lenited to /ɾ/ e.g. /déˈpʰâ̰ɾ/ - "depart". Dorsal consonants lenited to /h/ e.g. /dáʔh/ - "darkness".
Clusters of Stop + /t/ were simplified to /t/ e.g. /ˈdóʔtà/ - "doctor".
Except in the above cases, /t/ was lost word finally e.g. /béiʔ/ - "belt".
Word final alveolar affricates became stops e.g. /ˈbwḭ̂d/ - "bridge".
/l/ was lost when not before a vowel e.g. /tʰṵ̂/ - "tool".
A version of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grassmann%27s_law Grassman's Law] occured, deaspirating all but the last occurence of an aspirated consonant in a phonological word e.g. /káukákʰôṵlà/ - "Coca-Cola", not */kʰáukákʰôṵlà/. Voiceless sonorants and /h/ count as aspirated consonants.
====Vowels====
The vowel system derives from Australian English, although in many cases spelling pronunciations are used rather than the actual Australian English pronunciation. Since colonisation of Antarctica, it has undergone a number of sound changes:
# The vowel in TRAP and MARRY underwent a three-way split. In untressed syllables, it became /a/. In stressed syllables, it underwent the bad-lad split, with the long version becoming /ai/ and causing lenition of the following consonant e.g. /bàḭɾ/ - "bad.REST", while the short version became /e/ e.g. /éʔ/ - "to be at".
# The vowel in BATH, PALM and START (Australian English is non-rhotic) became /a/ in unstressed syllables, and /aː/ in stressed syllables (causing lenition of the following consonant). Then these both merged into /a/ (Kämpya lost phonemic vowel length) e.g. /déˈpʰâ̰ɾ/ - "depart".
# The vowel in NURSE merged into the above vowel e.g. /nà̤ɾ/ - "nurse".
# The vowel in LOT, CLOTH and HOT became /a/ in unstressed syllables, and /o/ in stressed syllables e.g. /ˈóʔpà/ - "opposite". However, before /l/ it became /ou/ e.g. /bôṵ/ - "bowl".
# The vowel in THOUGHT and NORTH became /o/ in unstressed syllables, and /oː/ in stressed syllables (causing lenition of the following consonant). Then these both merged into /o/ e.g. /pʰò̰/ - "four". However, before /u/ it became /ou/ e.g. /m̥óṵ/ - "small.DESC".
# The vowel in KIT became /i/ e.g. /ˈbíʔ/ - "bite" (from English "bit"). However, before /l/ it became /ju/ e.g. /hjṵ̂/ - "hill".
# The vowel in HEAT usually became /ei/ e.g. /déiʔp/ - "deeply". However, before /j/ it became /e/ e.g. /ˈpʰḛ̂jòd/ - "fjord". And before /l/, it became /i/ e.g. /pʰḭ̂lìŋ/ - "display of emotions" (from English "feeling").
# The vowel in DRESS and MERRY normally became /e/ e.g. /ˈḛ̂nèm/ - "enemy". However, before /l/ it became /ei/ e.g. /béiʔ/ - "belt".
# The vowel in SQUARE and MARY became /e/ in unstressed syllables, and /eː/ in stressed syllables (causing lenition of the following consonant). Then these both merged into /e/ e.g. /kʰḛ̂/ - "hospital patient" (from English "care")
# The vowel in STRUT normally became /a/ e.g. /sʰâ̰n/ - "son". However, before /l/, it became /au/ e.g. /kâṵ/ - "skull".
# The vowel is FOOT became /u/ e.g. /pʰúʔ/ - "foot".
# The vowel in GOOSE became /u/ in unstressed syllables, and usually became /ei/ in stressed syllables e.g. /gèi̤/ - "goose". However, before another vowel, it became /e/ e.g. /sʰḛ̂wà/ - "sewer". In stressed syllables before /l/, it became /u/ e.g. /tʰṵ̂/ - "tool"
# The vowel in FACE normally became /ai/ e.g. /nâḭm/ - "name". However, before /l/ it became /aju/ e.g. /ˈhwâ̰jù/ - "whale".
# The vowel in PRICE became /ou/ in stressed syllables, and /ai/ in unstressed syllables e.g. /pʰwòṳ/ - "price", /ˈḭ̂mwài/ - "invitation" (from an initial stressed derived form of "invite"). However, before /l/ it became /oju/ in stressed syllables, and /aju/ elsewhere e.g. /tʰô̰jù/ - "tile".
# The vowel in CHOICE became /ou/ e.g. /tʰjòi̤/ - "choice", except before /l/ when it became /oju/ e.g. /ˈbô̰jù/ - "hot spring" (from English "boil").
# The vowel in GOAT usually became /au/ e.g. /n̥âṵ/ - "snow". However, in a stressed syllable before /l/ it became /ou/ e.g. /kʰôṵlà/ - "(Coca-)Cola".
# The vowel in MOUTH became /ei/ in a stressed syllable, and /au/ in an unstressed syllable e.g. /mèi̤/ - "mouth".
# The vowel in NEAR became /i/ in unstressed syllables, and /iː/ in stressed syllables (causing lenition of the following consonant). Then these both merged into /i/ e.g. /pʰì̤ɾ/ - "fierce".
# As a very general rule, schwa became /a/, however in a lot of cases it developed into another vowel, being influenced by spelling e.g. /éˈléʔt/ - "to vote" (from English "elect").


==Pronouns==
==Pronouns==


Pronouns are not marked for singular or plural, but there are two words for "we" depending on whether the listener is included [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clusivity]. The pronouns that do not include the listener are also used to only talk about the speaker. Another way of looking at this is that Kämpya makes no distinction between "us not including you" and "me", but uses different forms for "us including you".
Pronouns are not marked for singular or plural, but there are two words for "we" depending on whether the listener is included [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clusivity]. The pronouns that do not include the listener are also used to only talk about the speaker. Another way of looking at this is that Kämpya makes no distinction between "us not including you" and "me", but uses different forms for "us including you".
There is also a set of interrogative pronouns that can mean "who" or "what" depending on the context (Kämpya conflates the two). By adding postpostions, words meaning "how" and "why" can be formed.


Kämpya has a tripartite case marking system on pronouns [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripartite_language]. However, the ergative pronouns are identical to the (alienable) genitive pronouns.
Kämpya has a tripartite case marking system on pronouns [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripartite_language]. However, the ergative pronouns are identical to the (alienable) genitive pronouns.
Line 203: Line 297:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! !! 1st Person Exclusive !! 1st Person Inclusive !! 2nd Person
! !! 1st Person Exclusive !! 1st Person Inclusive !! 2nd Person !! Interrogative
|-
|-
| Before a consonant || ái || wéi || jéi
| Before a consonant || ái || wéi || jéi || bá
|-
|-
| Before a vowel || ój- || wéj- || jéw-  
| Before a vowel || áj- || wéj- || jéw- || báj-
|-
|-
| Emphatic || òṵ || wèḭ || jèḭ
| Emphatic || òṵ || wèḭ || jèḭ || bà̰
|}
|}


As you can see above, the emphatic forms all have Low Tone with Harsh Phonation (i.e. belong to Tone Class 2), while all the other forms have High Tone with no phonation (i.e. modal phonation).
As you can see above, the emphatic forms all have Low Tone with Harsh Phonation (i.e. belong to Tone Class 2), while all the other forms have High Tone with no phonation (i.e. modal phonation).


===Accusative Pronouns===
===Accusative Pronouns===
Line 219: Line 312:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! !! 1st Person Exclusive !! 1st Person Inclusive !! 2nd Person !! 3PS !! Reflexive
! !! 1st Person Exclusive !! 1st Person Inclusive !! 2nd Person !! 3PS !! Reflexive !! Interrogative
|-
|-
| Before a consonant || mí || lán || ŋí || swí || sé
| Before a consonant || mí || lé || té || swí || sé || ké
|-
|-
| Before a vowel || mj- || lán- || íŋ- || síw- || és-
| Before a vowel || mj- || lés- || ét- || síw- || és- || ék-
|-
|-
| Emphatic || mḭ̀ || là̰n || ḭ̀ŋ || swḭ̀ || sḛ̀
| Emphatic || mḭ̀ || lè̤ || tḛ̀ || swḭ̀ || sḛ̀ || kḛ̀
|}
|}


The emphatic forms are also used with postpositions e.g. /mḭ̀=m̥á/ - "from me".
The emphatic forms are also used with postpositions e.g. /mḭ̀=hwám/ - "from me".


===Genitive / Ergative Pronouns===
===Genitive / Ergative Pronouns===
Line 238: Line 331:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! !! 1st Person Exclusive !! 1st Person Inclusive !! 2nd Person !! 3PS Proximate !! 3PS Obviative
! !! 1PS Excl. !! 1PS Incl. !! 2PS !! 3PS Prox. !! 3PS Obv. !! Interrogative
|-
|-
| Before a consonant (Inalienable) || mái || áu || jó || dé || ðí
| Before a consonant (Inalienable) || mái || áu || jó || ðé || ðí || héi
|-
|-
| Before a vowel (Inalienable) || máj- || áw- || jólw- || délw- || ðj-
| Before a vowel (Inalienable) || máj- || áw- || józw- || ðézw- || ðj- || héw-
|-
|-
| Alienable || môṵ || ˈḛ̂wà || jô̰ || dḛ̂- || ðjíʔ
| Alienable / Ergative || môṵ || ˈḛ̂wà || jô̰ || ðḛ̂- || ðjíʔ || hèi̤
|-
|-
| Ergative || môṵ || ˈḛ̂wà || jô̰ || N/A || ðjíʔ
| Emphatic || mòṵ || ˈḛ̀wá || bwò̤ || swḭ̀ || ðjìʔ || hèi̤
|-
| Emphatic || mòṵ || ˈḛ̀wá || bwò̤ || swḭ̀ || sḛ̀
|}
|}


Line 258: Line 349:
===Copula===
===Copula===


Kämpya has no verb meaning "to be" [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_copula]. Instead, the two words are simply placed side by side in the sentence. e.g.
Kämpya has no verb meaning "to be" (something) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_copula]. Instead, the two words are simply placed side by side in the sentence. e.g.




/ˈsíʔtà ˈḛ̂nèmì/
/ˈsʰíʔtà ˈḛ̂nèm/


guardian enemy
guardian enemy
Line 268: Line 359:




/jéi ˈsíʔtà/ phonetically [jéiˈsíʔtà]
/jéi ˈsʰíʔtà/ phonetically [jéiˈsʰíʔtà]


2PS.INTR guardian
2PS.INTR guardian
Line 278: Line 369:




/jéw ˈḛ̂nèmì/ phonetically [jéˈwḛ̂nèmì]
/jéw ˈḛ̂nèm/ phonetically [jéˈwḛ̂ːnèⁿ]


2PS.INTR enemy
2PS.INTR enemy
Line 288: Line 379:




/jèḭ ˈḛ̂nèmì/ phonetically [jèḭ ˈḛ̂nèmì]
/jèḭ ˈḛ̂nèm/ phonetically [jèḭ ˈḛ̂ːnèⁿ]


2PS.INT.EMP enemy
2PS.INT.EMP enemy
Line 300: Line 391:




/kʰwèi̤ áˈlôṵn/
/dô̰k áˈlâṵn/


dog alone
dog alone
Line 309: Line 400:
as well as
as well as


/áˈlôṵn kʰwèi̤/
/áˈlâṵn dô̰k/


alone dog
alone dog
Line 318: Line 409:
====Constituent Deletion====
====Constituent Deletion====


However, constituents of phrases can be freely deleted, so it is perfectly possible to have one word sentences e.g.
However, the arguments of intransitive sentences can be freely deleted, so it is perfectly possible to have one word sentences e.g.


/áˈlôṵn/
/áˈlâṵn/


alone
alone
Line 329: Line 420:
====With Postpositional Phrases====
====With Postpositional Phrases====


If we include a postpositional phrase in the sentence, it must come immediately before the verb (except for any pronouns) e.g. with the postpositional phrase /ˈkʰòʔnát=m̥á/ - "from Hkónat (a place name)", the verb /kúʔn/ - "to set off" and the noun /ˈḛ̂nèmì/ - "enemy", we can say:
If we include a postpositional phrase in the sentence, it must come immediately before the verb (except for any pronouns) e.g. with the postpositional phrase /ˈbwḛ̀lí=hwám/ - "from the valley", the verb /déˈpʰâ̰ɾ/ - "to set off" and the noun /ˈḛ̂nèm/ - "enemy", we can say:


/ˈkʰòʔnát=m̥á kúʔn ˈḛ̂nèmì/
/ˈbwḛ̀lí=hwám déˈpʰáʔɾ ˈḛ̂nèm/


Hkónat=from depart enemy
valley=from depart enemy


The enemy departs from Hkónat.
The enemy departs from the valley.




or
or


/ˈḛ̂nèmì ˈkʰòʔnát=m̥á kúʔn/
/ˈḛ̂nèm ˈbwḛ̀lí=hwám déˈpʰáʔɾ/
 
enemy valley=from depart
 
The enemy departs from the valley.
 
 
To say "A is located at / in / on etc. B", Kämpya uses the verb /éʔ/ and the locative clitic /ká/ e.g.
 
/ˈḛ̂nèm ˈbwḛ̀lí=ká éʔ/


enemy Hkónat=from depart
enemy valley=LOC be.at


The enemy departs from Hkónat.
The enemy is at the valley.




Note that /éʔ/ cannot be used as a copula (to say something is something else). As discussed previously, in such a case, no verb is used at all.


====With Adverbs====
====With Adverbs====
Line 352: Line 453:
Unlike adverbs of place and other postpositional phrases which precede the verb, adverbs of manner and time follow it (and are placed in Tone Class 3) e.g.
Unlike adverbs of place and other postpositional phrases which precede the verb, adverbs of manner and time follow it (and are placed in Tone Class 3) e.g.


/kúʔn ˈlwéʔpìd tjǎ̤ŋ ˈḛ̂nèmì/
/déˈpʰáʔɾ zwéʔp ˈjě̤tài ˈḛ̂nèm/


depart fast yesterday enemy
depart fast yesterday enemy


The enemy departed quickly yesterday.
The enemy departed quickly yesterday.


====With Pronouns====
====With Pronouns====
Line 363: Line 463:
The same subject pronouns as before are also used for intransitive sentences e.g.
The same subject pronouns as before are also used for intransitive sentences e.g.


/jéi kúʔn/
/jéi déˈpʰáʔɾ/


2PS depart
2PS depart
Line 370: Line 470:




However, the pronoun must immediately precede the verb so */kúʔn jéi/ is ungrammatical. And postpositional phrases cannot intervene between the pronoun and the verb, so */jéi ˈkʰóʔnàt m̥à kúʔn/ is ungrammatical. They must come before the pronoun, so it is only grammatical to say:
However, the pronoun must immediately precede the verb so */déˈpʰâ̰ɾ jéi/ is ungrammatical. And postpositional phrases cannot intervene between the pronoun and the verb, so */jéi ˈkʰóʔnàt=hwám déˈpʰâ̰ɾ/ is ungrammatical. They must come before the pronoun, so it is only grammatical to say:


/ˈkʰòʔnát=m̥á jéi kúʔn/
/ˈbwḛ̀lí=hwám jéi déˈpʰáʔɾ/


Hkónat=from 2PS depart
valley=from 2PS depart
 
You are setting off from ˈkʰóʔnàt.


You are setting off from the valley.


===Transitive Sentences===
===Transitive Sentences===
Line 383: Line 482:
In transitive sentences without pronouns, the basic word order is SVO, with the subject marked with the ergative clitic /-zu/ e.g.
In transitive sentences without pronouns, the basic word order is SVO, with the subject marked with the ergative clitic /-zu/ e.g.


/ˈkʰwèi̤=zù káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/


dog=ERG bite lizard
dog=ERG bite lizard
Line 390: Line 489:




However, immediately after an open syllable with breathy or harsh voice (and thus necessarily a stressed vowel), the ergative clitic has the allomorph /-ɾu/ e.g.
However, immediately after a monophthong with breathy or harsh voice (and thus necessarily a stressed vowel), the ergative clitic has the allomorph /-ɾu/ e.g.


/ŋà̤=ɾù káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/kʰjâṵ=ɾù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/


fish=ERG bite lizard
cow=ERG bite lizard


It was the fish that bit the lizard.
It was the cow that bit the lizard.




Line 403: Line 502:
The come after the ergative noun, but before the verb (or any pronouns) e.g.
The come after the ergative noun, but before the verb (or any pronouns) e.g.


/ˈkʰwèi̤=zù pʰáˈzè̤t=dé káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/dô̰k=zù pʰò̤wé=ká ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/


dog=ERG forest=in bite lizard
dog=ERG forest=LOC bite lizard


It was the dog that bit the lizard in the forest.
It was the dog that bit the lizard in the forest.


====Topicalisation====
====Topicalisation====
Line 414: Line 512:
However, Kämpya speakers very often topicalise either the subject or the object. The object is topicalised by moving it in front of the subject (i.e. making the sentence OSV) e.g.
However, Kämpya speakers very often topicalise either the subject or the object. The object is topicalised by moving it in front of the subject (i.e. making the sentence OSV) e.g.


/gáʔɾ kʰwèi̤=zù káiʔk/
/ˈlḭ̂zàd dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ/


lizard dog=ERG bite
lizard dog=ERG bite


The lizard was bitten by the dog.
The lizard was bitten by the dog.


The subject of a transitive sentence is topicalised by deleting the ergative marker e.g.
The subject of a transitive sentence is topicalised by deleting the ergative marker e.g.


/kʰwèi̤ káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/dô̰k ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/


dog bite lizard
dog bite lizard
Line 428: Line 527:
The dog bit the lizard.
The dog bit the lizard.


The difference between this and /kʰwèi̤ zù káiʔk gáʔɾ/ (i.e. with the case marker), is that, in the sentence with the case marker, the "new information" being presented to the listener is that it was the dog that did the biting. Without the case marker, it is a sentence describing the dog, and the new information is that it bit the lizard. This is analagous to the difference between "ga" and "wa" in Japanese.


Also note that topicalising both the subject and object is ungrammatical i.e. we cannot say  */gáʔɾ kʰwèi̤ káiʔk/ or anything like that.
The difference between this and /dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ lḭ̂zàd/ (i.e. with the case marker), is that, in the sentence with the case marker, the "new information" being presented to the listener is that it was the dog that did the biting. Without the case marker, it is a sentence describing the dog, and the new information is that it bit the lizard. This is analagous to the difference between "ga" and "wa" in Japanese.
 
 
Also note that topicalising both the subject and object is ungrammatical i.e. we cannot say  */lḭ̂zàd dô̰k ˈbíʔ/ or anything like that.




Line 437: Line 538:
The (alienable) genitive pronouns discussed earlier can also be the subject of transitive verbs e.g.
The (alienable) genitive pronouns discussed earlier can also be the subject of transitive verbs e.g.


/jô̰ káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/jô̰ ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/


2PS.ERG bite lizard
2PS.ERG bite lizard
Line 447: Line 548:
As before, the object can be fronted as a topic e.g.
As before, the object can be fronted as a topic e.g.


/gáʔɾ jô̰ káiʔk/
/ˈlḭ̂zàd jô̰ ˈbíʔ/


lizard 2PS.ERG bite
lizard 2PS.ERG bite
Line 460: Line 561:




/pʰáˈzè̤t=dé jô̰ káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/pʰò̤wé=ká jô̰ ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/


forest=in 2PS.ERG bite lizard
forest=LOC 2PS.ERG bite lizard


You bit the lizard in the forest.
You bit the lizard in the forest.
Line 470: Line 571:




/kʰwèi̤ ŋí=káiʔk/
/dô̰k té=ˈbíʔ/


dog 2PS.ACC=bite
dog 2PS.ACC=bite
Line 479: Line 580:
or
or


/ŋí=káiʔk kʰwèi̤/
/té=ˈbíʔ dô̰k/


2PS.ACC=bite dog
2PS.ACC=bite dog
Line 485: Line 586:
You will be bitten by the dog.
You will be bitten by the dog.


Using the ergative form /kʰwèi̤=zù/ is ungrammatical here.
Using the ergative form /dô̰k=zù/ is ungrammatical here.




Line 491: Line 592:




jéi=swí=káiʔk
/jéi=swí=ˈbíʔ/


2PS.INTR=3PS.ACC=bite
2PS.INTR=3PS.ACC=bite
Line 498: Line 599:




It would be ungrammatical to say */jô̰ swí=káiʔk/.
It would be ungrammatical to say */jô̰ swí=bíʔ/.
 


====Reciprocal Voice====
====Reciprocal Voice====


This takes a transitive verb and turns it into an intransitive verb meaning "do ... to each other / one another". It is formed by reduplicating the first syllable of the verb, and putting it as a particle in the object pronoun "slot" e.g. /ˈdè̤sì/ - "to speak" -> /dé ˈdè̤sì/ - "to speak to each other".
This takes a transitive verb and turns it into an intransitive verb meaning "do ... to each other / one another". It is formed by reduplicating the first syllable of the verb, and putting it as a particle in the object pronoun "slot" e.g. /ˈbíʔ/ - "to bite" -> /bíˈbíʔ/ - "to bite each other".
However coda consonants and the second elements of diphthongs are deleted e.g. /péiʔk/ - "to speak" -> /péiˈpéiʔk/ - "to speak to each other".


However coda consonants and the second elements of diphthongs are deleted e.g. /káiʔk/ - "to bite" -> /ká káiʔk/ - "to bite each other".


Also if the onset of the first syllable contains an aspirated consonant, the aspiration is lost in the reduplication e.g. /sʰwè̤/ - "to pull" -> /sé sʰwè̤/ - "to pull each other".
Also if the onset of the first syllable contains an aspirated consonant, the aspiration is lost in the reduplication e.g. /pʰṵ̂/ - "to pull" -> /púˈpʰṵ̂/ - "to pull each other".


If the onset of the first syllable contains a voiceless nasal, the it becomes voiced in the reduplication e.g. - /m̥â̰n/ "to correct" -> /má m̥â̰n/ - "to correct each other". Likewise, if the onset of the first syllable contains /h/, it is lost in the reduplication e.g. /hwêg/ - "to play" -> /wé hwêg/ - "to play with each other".
If the onset of the first syllable contains a voiceless nasal, the it becomes voiced in the reduplication e.g. - /ˈm̥ô̰jù/ "to entertain" -> /móˈm̥ô̰jù/ - "to entertain each other". Likewise, if the onset of the first syllable contains /h/, it is lost in the reduplication e.g. /hléʔp/ - "to slap" -> /léˈhléʔp/ - "to slap each other".




Line 516: Line 616:
It is perfectly acceptable to delete the subject of a transitive sentence e.g.
It is perfectly acceptable to delete the subject of a transitive sentence e.g.


/káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/


bite lizard
bite lizard
Line 523: Line 623:




/gáʔɾ káiʔk/
/ˈlḭ̂zàd ˈbíʔ/


lizard bite
lizard bite
Line 536: Line 636:
To delete the object of a transitive sentence, the antipassive voice is used [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipassive_voice]. This is done with the clitic /θu-/. It goes in the same syntactic "slot" as an object pronoun would e.g.
To delete the object of a transitive sentence, the antipassive voice is used [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipassive_voice]. This is done with the clitic /θu-/. It goes in the same syntactic "slot" as an object pronoun would e.g.


/kʰwèi̤ θú=káiʔk/
/dô̰k θú=ˈbíʔ/


dog ANTIP=bite
dog ANTIP=bite
Line 545: Line 645:
However, if followed by a vowel, the form of the clitic is /θw-/ e.g.
However, if followed by a vowel, the form of the clitic is /θw-/ e.g.


/kʰwèi̤ θw=áhlôṵn/
/dô̰k θw=álâṵn/


dog ANTIP=abandon
dog ANTIP=abandon
Line 552: Line 652:




The deleted object can be re-introduced at the end of the sentence using the dative clitic /-àuŋ/ (note that this does not change the tone class of the noun) e.g.
The deleted object can be re-introduced using the dative postposition, /-gó/ (which changes the noun into Tone Class 2). These nouns are re-introduced into the same syntactic "slot" as postpositional objects e.g.


/kʰwèi̤ θú=káiʔk gáʔɾ=àuŋ/
/dô̰k ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ /


dog ANTIP=bite lizard=DAT
dog lizard=DAT ANTIP=bite


The dog bit the lizard.
The dog bit the lizard.
Line 563: Line 663:
At first glance, this may seem pointless, as we could have quite easily have said:
At first glance, this may seem pointless, as we could have quite easily have said:


/ˈkʰwèi̤=zù káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/


dog=ERG bite lizard
dog=ERG bite lizard
Line 570: Line 670:




However, the difference is that Kämpya has ergative syntax. Whatever argument of the verb is in the absolutive case is the syntactic pivot [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_pivot]. In a normal transitive sentence, this is the object of the verb. But, by using the antipassive voice, the subject of the transitive verb becomes the syntactic pivot. If we combine the two sentences above with the verb /pjèi̤/ - "to flee", the meaning becomes very different:
However, the difference is that Kämpya has ergative syntax. Whatever argument of the verb is in the absolutive case is the syntactic pivot [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntactic_pivot]. In a normal transitive sentence, this is the object of the verb. But, by using the antipassive voice, the subject of the transitive verb becomes the syntactic pivot. If we combine the two sentences above with the verb /áˈwâḭ/ - "to flee", the meaning becomes very different:


/kʰwèi̤ θú=káiʔk gáʔɾ=àuŋ pjèi̤/
/dô̰k ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ áˈwâḭ/


dog ANTIP=bite lizard=DAT flee
dog lizard=DAT ANTIP=bite flee


The dog bit the lizard and (the dog) ran away.
The dog bit the lizard and (the dog) ran away.
Line 580: Line 680:
vs.
vs.


/ˈkʰwèi̤=zù káiʔk gáʔɾ pjèi̤/
/dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd áˈwâḭ/


dog=ERG bite lizard flee
dog=ERG bite lizard flee


The dog that bit the lizard and the lizard ran away.
The dog bit the lizard and the lizard ran away.
 
 
Note that the dative clitic has the allomorph /jàuŋ/ after a vowel e.g.
 
/gáʔɾ θú=káiʔk kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ/
 
lizard ANTIP=bite dog=DAT
 
The lizard bit the dog.
 


===Ditransitive Sentences===
===Ditransitive Sentences===


For verbs such as "give", "sell", "send" etc. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ditransitive], the normal situation is to have the donor marked in the ergative case in the usual position (i.e before the verb and any postpositional phrases), the theme (whatever is being given / sold etc. to someone) directly after it, and marked with the secundative postposition /-ti/, and the recipient in the absolutive case either after the verb or topicalised at the beginning of the sentence e.g.
For verbs such as "give", "sell", "send" etc. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ditransitive], the normal situation is to have the donor marked in the ergative case in the usual position (i.e before the verb and any postpositional phrases), the theme (whatever is being given / sold etc. to someone) directly after it, and marked with the secundative postposition /-ta/, and the recipient in the absolutive case either after the verb or topicalised at the beginning of the sentence e.g.


/ˈsíʔtà=zù áˈjòṳ=tí gḭ̂b kʰwèi̤/
/ˈsʰíʔtà=zù bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/


guardian=ERG bone=SEC give dog
guardian=ERG bone=SEC give dog
Line 609: Line 699:
or
or


/kʰwèi̤ ˈsíʔtà=zù áˈjòṳ=tí gḭ̂b/
/dô̰k ˈsʰíʔtà=zù tí=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p/


dog guardian=ERG bone=SEC give
dog guardian=ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give


The dog was given a bone by the guardian.
The dog was given a bone by the guardian.
Line 618: Line 708:
The ergative argument can be topicalised in the same way e.g.
The ergative argument can be topicalised in the same way e.g.


/ˈsíʔtà áˈjòṳ=tí gḭ̂b kʰwèi̤/
/ˈsʰíʔtà tí=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/


guardian bone=SEC give dog
guardian INDEF=bone=SEC give dog


The guardian gave the bone to the dog.
The guardian gave the bone to the dog.
Line 627: Line 717:
It is also perfectly possible to put a ditransitive sentence in the antipassive voice e.g.
It is also perfectly possible to put a ditransitive sentence in the antipassive voice e.g.


/ˈsíʔtà áˈjòṳ=tí θú=gḭ̂b kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ/
/ˈsʰíʔtà bàṵn=tá dò̰k=gó θú=gḭ̂p/


guardian bone=SEC ANTIP=give dog=DAT
guardian bone=SEC dog=DAT ANTIP=give


The guardian gave the bone to the dog.
The guardian gave the bone to the dog.


 
===With Postpositional Phrases===
====With Postpositional Phrases===


Postpositional phrases usually come after the theme (i.e. whatever takes the secundative case) e.g.
Postpositional phrases usually come after the theme (i.e. whatever takes the secundative case) e.g.


/ˈsíʔtà=zù áˈjòṳ=tí pʰáˈzè̤t=dé gḭ̂b kʰwèi̤/
/ˈsʰíʔtà=zù bàṵn=tá pʰò̤wé=ká gḭ̂p dô̰k/


guardian=ERG bone=SEC forest=in give dog
guardian=ERG bone=SEC forest=LOC give dog


It was the guardian that gave the bone to the dog in the forest.
It was the guardian that gave the bone to the dog in the forest.
Line 647: Line 736:
====Allomorphy====
====Allomorphy====


Immediately after a monophthong with breathy voice (and thus necessarily a vowel in an open syllable that has stress), the secundative clitic becomes /ɾi/ e.g.
=====Clitics beginning with /t/ and /p/=====
 
Immediately after a monophthong with breathy voice (and thus necessarily a vowel in an open syllable that has stress), an inital /t/ in clitics lenites to /ɾ/. For example, the secundative clitic /ta/ becomes /ɾa/ e.g.
 
/ˈsʰíʔtà gwà̤=ɾá gḭ̂p dô̰k/
 
guardian grass=SEC give dog
 
The guardian gave the grass to the dog.
 
 
Immediately after a monophthong with harsh voice, /t/ also lenites to /ɾ/. However, it also triggers a phonation shift on the vowel from harsh to glottalised e.g. the noun meaning "snare" is /n̥ḛ̀/ in Tone Class 2. It normally has harsh voice, but it combines with the secundative clitic to form /n̥èʔ=ɾá/, as in:
 
/ˈsʰíʔtà n̥ḛ̀=ɾá dò̰k=gó θú=gḭ̂p/
 
guardian snare=SEC dog=DAT ANTIP=give
 
Literally "the guardian gave the snare to the dog", but "give a snare" could also be translated as "use a snare to catch".
 
 
In similar situations, /p/ lenites to /ⱱ/. For example, the instrumental postposition /piŋ/ likewise becomes /ⱱiŋ/ e.g. /pèiʔk/ - "words" becomes /ˈpèiʔk=píŋ/ - "using words", but /gwà̤/ - "grass" becomes /gwà̤=ⱱíŋ/ - "using grass", and words with harsh voice on the final vowel such as /n̥ḛ̀/ - "snare", become /n̥èʔ=ⱱíŋ/ - "using a snare".


/ˈsíʔtà ŋà̤=ɾí gḭ̂b kʰwèi̤/


guardian fish=SEC give dog
=====Clitics beginning with /d/, /z/ and /b/=====


The guardian gave the fish to the dog.
Immediately after a monophthong with harsh or breathy voice, /d/, /z/ also lenite to /ɾ/ (as we have seen with the ergative clitic /-zu/). /b/ also lenites to /ⱱ/. But they do not trigger any phonation changes on the vowel.




Immediately after a monophthong with harsh voice, the clitic also becomes /ɾi/. However, it also triggers a phonation shift on the vowel from harsh to glottalised e.g. the noun meaning "animal fat" is /áˈsʰḭ̀/ in Tone Class 2. It normally has harsh voice, but it combines with the secundative clitic to form /áˈsʰìʔ=ɾí/, as in:
=====Clitics beginning with /g/=====


/ˈsíʔtà áˈsʰìʔ=ɾí θú=gḭ̂b kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ/
Immediately after a monophthong with harsh or breathy voice, /g/ is lenited to /h/. However this triggers deaspiration in the word it attaches to (in a similar fashion to Grassman's law in Indo-European languages). Aspirated consonants lose their aspiration, /h/ is deleted, and voiceless nasals become voiced e.g. with the postposition /-gei/ - "since the time of"


guardian fat=SEC ANTIP=give dog=DAT
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Gloss !! Base Form !! Form with /-gei/
|-
| class || kʰlà̤ || klà̤=héi
|-
| snare || n̥ḛ̀ || nḛ̀=héi
|-
| mother || múˈhḛ̀ || múˈḛ̀=héi (more commonly /ˈmwḛ̀=héi/)
|}


The guardian gave the fat to the dog.
=====Clitics beginning with /k/=====


The /k/ here lenits to /h/ and triggers deaspiration in exactly the same way as /g/. However, if the monophthong had harsh voice, it changes to be glottalised e.g. from /n̥ḛ̀/ - "snare", if we add the locative clitic /-ka/, the result is /nèʔ=há/ - "at the snare".


====With Pronouns====
====With Pronouns====
Line 672: Line 790:




/áˈjòṳ=tí pʰáˈzè̤t=dé jô̰ gḭ̂b kʰwèi̤/
/bàṵn=tá pʰò̤wé=ká jô̰ gḭ̂p dô̰k/


bone=SEC forest=in 2PS.ERG give dog
bone=SEC forest=LOC 2PS.ERG give dog


You gave the bone to the dog in the forest.
You gave the bone to the dog in the forest.
Line 682: Line 800:




/jô̰ áˈjòṳ=tí pʰáˈzè̤t=dé gḭ̂b kʰwèi̤/
/jô̰ bàṵn=tá pʰò̤wé=ká gḭ̂p dô̰k/


2PS.ERG bone=SEC forest=in give dog
2PS.ERG bone=SEC forest=LOC give dog


You gave the bone to the dog in the forest.
You gave the bone to the dog in the forest.




This creates a small amount of amiguity, since /jô̰ áˈjòṳ=tí/ can also be read as "your bone (alienable)". Thus the above sentence could also be read as "your bone (alienable) was given to the dog in the forest".
This creates a small amount of amiguity, since /jô̰ bàṵn=tá/ can also be read as "your bone (alienable)". Thus the above sentence could also be read as "your bone (alienable) was given to the dog in the forest".
 
 
=====Secundative Pronouns=====


The emphatic forms of the accusative pronouns are used, together with the secundative postposition /tí/. However, some of these pronouns end in open monophthongs with harsh phonation, triggering the sandhi rules discussed before (changing the phonation on the vowel to glottalised, and leniting the postposition to /ɾí/. Here is a list of the pronouns when used with the secundative postposition:
=====With Postpositions=====


1st Person Exclusive - /mìʔ=ɾí/
The emphatic forms of the accusative pronouns are used with a postposition (e.g. the secundative /tá/). However, these pronouns trigger the same sandhi rules discussed before (changing the phonation on the vowel to glottalised), and leniting the postposition to. Here is a list of the pronouns when used with the secundative postposition:


1st Person Inclusive = /là̰n=tí/
1st Person Exclusive - /mìʔ=ɾá/


2nd Person = /ḭ̀ŋ=tí/
1st Person Inclusive - /lè̤=ɾá/


3rd Person = /swìʔ=ɾí/
2nd Person - /tèʔ=ɾá/


Reflexive = /sèʔ=ɾí/
3rd Person - /swìʔ=ɾá/


Reflexive - /sèʔ=ɾá/


===Applicative Voice===
===Applicative Voice===


To topicalise a noun in a postpositional phrase, Kämpya uses applicative constructions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applicative_voice]. These are formed by first shifting the noun in the absolutive case to the end of the sentence (and marking it with the dative clitic /-àuŋ/). In turn, the noun that the postposition was attached to goes into the absolutive case, and the postposition is placed after the verb as a clitic e.g. from the sentence:
To topicalise a noun in a postpositional phrase, Kämpya uses applicative constructions [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Applicative_voice]. These are formed by first shifting the noun in the absolutive case to the postpositonal object "slot" in the sentence (and marking it with the dative clitic /=gó/). In turn, the noun that the postposition was attached to goes into the absolutive case (and changes to Tone Class 1), and the postposition is placed after the verb as a clitic e.g. from the sentence:


/ˈkʰwèi̤=zù pʰáˈzè̤t=dé káiʔk gáʔɾ/
/ˈdô̰k=zù pʰò̤wé=ká ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/


dog=ERG forest=in bite lizard
dog=ERG forest=LOC bite lizard


It was the dog that bit the lizard in the forest.
It was the dog that bit the lizard in the forest.
Line 720: Line 836:
we can apply an applicative transformation to get:
we can apply an applicative transformation to get:


/pʰáˈzè̤t ˈkʰwèi̤=zù káiʔk=dè gáʔɾ=àuŋ/
/pʰò̤wè ˈdô̰k=zù lḭ̀zád=góˈbíʔ=kà/


forest dog=ERG bite=in lizard=DAT
forest dog=ERG lizard=DAT bite=LOC


In the forest, the dog bit the lizard.
In the forest, the dog bit the lizard.
Line 729: Line 845:
As another example, the sentence
As another example, the sentence


/ˈḛ̂nèmì ˈkʰòʔnát=m̥á kúʔn/
/ˈḛ̂nèm ˈbwḛ̀lí=hwám déˈpʰáʔɾ/


enemy Hkónat=from depart
enemy valley=from depart


The enemy departed from Hkónat.
The enemy departed from the valley.




becomes the following:
becomes the following:


/ˈkʰóʔnàt kúʔn=m̥à ˈḛ̂nèmì=jàuŋ/
/ˈbwḛ̂lì ˈè̤ném=gó déˈpáʔɾ=hwàm/
 
valley enemy=DAT depart=from


Hkónat depart=from enemy=DAT
From the valley, the enemy departed.


From Hkónat, the enemy departed.


Note here the tone change from /ˈkʰòʔnát/ (in a postpositional phrase and thus Tone Class 2) to /ˈkʰóʔnàt/ (in Tone Class 1 like most nouns). We cannot see this in the previous example because the word for "forest" is /pʰáˈzè̤t/ in both Tone Class 1 and Tone Class 2.
Note here the tone change from /ˈkʰòʔnát/ (in a postpositional phrase and thus Tone Class 2) to /ˈkʰóʔnàt/ (in Tone Class 1 like most nouns). The same thing happened with the word for "forest" changing from /pʰò̤wé/ to /pʰò̤wè/.




Likewise, in ditransitive sentences, the theme (i.e. whatever is given by the donor to the recipient) can also be topicalised by the same process e.g.
Likewise, in ditransitive sentences, the theme (i.e. whatever is given by the donor to the recipient) can also be topicalised by the same process e.g.


/kʰwèi̤ ˈsíʔtà=zù áˈjòṳ=tí gḭ̂b/
/dô̰k ˈsʰíʔtà=zù tí=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p/


dog guardian=ERG bone=SEC give
dog guardian=ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give


The dog was given a bone by the guardian.
The dog was given a bone by the guardian.
Line 758: Line 875:
becomes
becomes


/áˈjòṳ ˈsíʔtà=zù gḭ̂b=tì kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ/
/bâṵn ˈsʰíʔtà=zù dò̰k=góˈgḭ̂p=tá/


bone guardian=ERG bone=SEC give=SEC dog=DAT
bone guardian=ERG dog=DAT give=SEC


The bone was given to the dog by the guardian.
The bone was given to the dog by the guardian.
Line 767: Line 884:
When a pronoun is the object of the verb to be put into the applicative voice, the subject is put into the dative case instead e.g. when we apply the applicative voice to
When a pronoun is the object of the verb to be put into the applicative voice, the subject is put into the dative case instead e.g. when we apply the applicative voice to


/kʰwèi̤ pʰáˈzè̤t=dé ŋí=káiʔk/
/dô̰k pʰò̤wé=ká té=ˈbíʔ/


dog forest=in 2PS.ACC=bite
dog forest=LOC 2PS.ACC=bite


The dog will bite you in the forest.
The dog bit you in the forest.




we get
we get


/pʰáˈzè̤t ŋí=káiʔk=dé kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ/
/pʰò̤wè dò̰k=gó té=ˈbíʔ=kà/


forest 2PS.ACC=bite=in dog=DAT
forest dog=DAT 2PS.ACC=bite=LOC


In the forest, the dog will bite you.
In the forest, the dog bit you.




Notice that when the postpositions /mḁ/, /de/ and /ti/ attach to a noun, they have High Tone, since postpositional phrases are in Tone Class 2. However, when they attach to a verb, they have has Low Tone, since verbs are in Tone Class 1.
Notice that when the postpositions /hwam/, /ka/ and /ti/ attach to a noun, they have High Tone, since postpositional phrases are in Tone Class 2. However, when they attach to a verb, they have has Low Tone, since verbs are in Tone Class 1.


This is clearly a cliticisation process, since adverbs can come before the particle but after the verb e.g.
This is clearly a cliticisation process, since adverbs can come before the particle but after the verb e.g.


/pʰáˈzè̤t kʰwèi̤=zù káiʔk tjǎ̤ŋ=dè gáʔɾ=àuŋ/
/pʰò̤wè ˈdô̰k=zù lḭ̀zád=gó bíʔ ˈˈjě̤tài=kà/


forest dog=ERG bite yesterday=in lizard=DAT
forest dog=ERG lizard=DAT bite yesterday.ADV=LOC


In the forest, the dog bit the lizard.
In the forest, the dog bit the lizard.
Line 802: Line 919:
When an adjective modifies a noun, Kämpya makes a distinction between restrictive and non-restrictive (descriptive) adjectives [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictiveness]. It does this by putting restrictive adjectives in Tone Class 2, and placing them before the noun they modify e.g.
When an adjective modifies a noun, Kämpya makes a distinction between restrictive and non-restrictive (descriptive) adjectives [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictiveness]. It does this by putting restrictive adjectives in Tone Class 2, and placing them before the noun they modify e.g.


/ˈlwèʔpíd kʰwèi̤/
/ˈzwèʔp dô̰k/


fast.REST dog
fast.REST dog
Line 811: Line 928:
Descriptive (non-restrictive) adjectives are in Tone Class 3 and follow the noun they modify e.g.
Descriptive (non-restrictive) adjectives are in Tone Class 3 and follow the noun they modify e.g.


/kʰwèi̤ˈlwéʔpìd/
/dô̰k ˈzwéʔp/


dog fast.DESC
dog fast.DESC
Line 820: Line 937:
or
or


/sôṵ ˈjḛ́làu/
/sôṵlà àˈwá̰/


sun yellow.DESC
sun yellow.DESC
Line 827: Line 944:




In the last case, it would never make any sense to say /ˈjḛ̀láu sôṵ/, unless for some reason we were disambiguating between multiple suns.
In the last case, it would never make any sense to say /áˈwà̰ sôṵlà/, unless for some reason we were disambiguating between multiple suns.
 


===Articles===
===Articles===


There are no definite articles, but there is an indefinite article clitic. It occupies the demonstrative syntactic "slot" and has the allomorphs /ti-/ before a consonant and /it-/ before a vowel e.g.
There are no definite articles, but there is an indefinite article clitic. It occupies the demonstrative syntactic "slot" and has the allomorphs /tí-/ before a consonant and /ít-/ before a vowel e.g.




/tí=kʰwèi̤/
/tí=dô̰k/


INDEF=dog
INDEF=dog
Line 842: Line 958:




/ít=áˈtâṵŋ/
/ít=ˈḛ̂nèm/


INDEF=feather
INDEF=enemy


a feather
an enemy




Kämpya nouns are not inflected for singular or plural, but when they take the indefinite article, they are only ever singular, so the above examples could never mean "some dogs" or "some feathers".
Kämpya nouns are not inflected for singular or plural, but when they take the indefinite article, they are only ever singular, so the above examples could never mean "some dogs" or "some enemies".


It is important to distinguish the indefinite article from the word for one /tìʔ/. The indefinite article is a clitic, which has no stress and is phonologically part of whatever word follows it i.e. it will have plain High Pitch no matter whether it is followed by a noun or (restrictive) adjective. On the other hand, the numeral /tìʔ/ - "one" is phonologically a separate word. In terms of the tonal morphology, it (like all other numerals) belongs to category 2, and is thus pronounced with Low Pitch.
It is important to distinguish the indefinite article from the word for one /tìʔ/. The indefinite article is a clitic, which has no stress and is phonologically part of whatever word follows it i.e. it will have plain High Pitch no matter whether it is followed by a noun or (restrictive) adjective. On the other hand, the numeral /tìʔ/ - "one" is phonologically a separate word. In terms of the tonal morphology, it (like all other numerals) belongs to category 2, and is thus pronounced with Low Pitch.
Line 855: Line 971:
Compare:
Compare:


/tí=kʰwèi̤/
/tí=dô̰k/


INDEF=dog
INDEF=dog
Line 864: Line 980:
with
with


/tìʔ kʰwèi̤/
/tìʔ dô̰k/


one dog
one dog
Line 871: Line 987:




Also, the numeral for one does not "reverse" (i.e. undergo metathesis) when the next syllable begins with a vowel e.g.
The numeral for "one" (or any other numerals) cannot be used with the indefinite article, so */tí=tìʔ dô̰k/ is ungrammatical.


However, (restrictive) adjectives can intervene between the indefinite article and the noun e.g.


/ít=áˈtâṵŋ/


INDEF=feather
/ít=áˈwà̰ dô̰k/


a feather
INDEF=yellow.REST dog


a yellow dog


vs.
===Demonstratives===
 
/tìʔ áˈtâṵŋ/
 
one feather


one feather


Kämpya's system of demonstratives is more complex than English. Unlike English which only makes a two-way distinction between "this" and "that", Kämpya makes a five-way contrast between "this" (on the same level as the speaker), "this" (above / uphill from the speaker), "this" (below / downhill from the speaker), "that" (far from the speaker but still visible) and "that" (invisible to the speaker). The distinction between uphill and downhill objects is particularly relevant for most Kämpya speakers, since they mostly live along a mountainous coastline. Dialects spoken in flatter areas tend to simplify the system.


The numeral for "one" (or any other numerals) cannot be used with the indefinite article, so */tí=tìʔ áˈtâṵŋ/ is ungrammatical.


However, (restrictive) adjectives can intervene between the indefinite article and the noun e.g.
It also uses tone to distinguish pronominal demonstratives (e.g. in the sentence "''This'' is a cat") from adnominal demonstratives (e.g. in the sentence "''This'' cat is here"). It also uses tone to make a further distinction in adnominal demonstratives depending on whether they are describing a place (in which case they are clitics), or something else.




/tí=ˈjḛ̀láu áˈtâṵŋ/
For example "this mountain" is /dá=ˈméiʔnàn/, since a mountain is a place. But "this dog" is /dà̰ dô̰k/, since a dog is not a place.


INDEF=yellow.REST feather
a yellow feather
===Demonstratives===
Kämpya has a two-way distance contrast in demonstratives (like English but unlike many other languages). It uses tone to distinguish pronominal demonstratives (e.g. in the sentence "''This'' is a cat") from adnominal demonstratives (e.g. in the sentence "''This'' cat is here"). It also uses tone to make a further distinction in adnominal demonstratives depending on whether they are describing a place, or something else.


Here is a table of the demonstratives:
Here is a table of the demonstratives:
Line 911: Line 1,014:
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
!  !! Tone !! This !! That
!  !! This (same level) !! This (higher / uphill) !! This (below / downhill) !! That (visible) !! That (invisible)
|-
|-
| Pronominal || Harsh Falling || dâ̰ || tʰôṵ
| Pronominal || dâ̰ || tʰéʔk || áuʔk || hôṵ || hlà̤n
|-
|-
| Adnominal (Places) || Modal High || dá || *tʰóu
| Adnominal (Places) || dá || *t(ʰ)ék || áuk || *(h)óu || *hlàn
|-
|-
| Adnominal (Other cases) || Harsh Low || dà̰ || tʰòṵ
| Adnominal (Other cases) || dà̰ || tʰèʔk || àuʔk || hòṵ || hlà̤n
|}
|}


*/tʰóu-/ has the allomorph /*tʰów-/ before a vowel.
*/hóu-/ has the allomorph /*hów-/ before a vowel. Before a word containing an aspirated consonant, a voiceless nasal or another /h/, the initial /h/ is dropped e.g. /óu=pʰò̤wè/ - "that forest", not */hóu=pʰò̤wè/. Under similar conditions, the initial /h/ in /hlàn/ is lost, as well as the aspiration in /t(ʰ)ék/.
 
 
So for example "this mountain" is /dá ˈmjáuʔnàn/, since a mountain is a place. But "this dog" is /dà̰ kʰwèi̤/, since a dog is not a place.


===Possession===
===Possession===


Kämpya distinguishes alienable and alienable possession. In both cases, possessors are marked with the cliticised case marker /ja/, and come before the noun they possess. But inalienable possessors are in Tone Class 2 e.g.
Kämpya distinguishes alienable and inalienable possession. In both cases, possessors are marked with the cliticised case marker /ja/, and come before the noun they possess. But inalienable possessors are in Tone Class 2 e.g.


/kʰwèi̤=já áˈjòṳ/
/dò̰k=jí bâṵn/


dog=GEN.INALIENABLE bone
dog=GEN.INALIENABLE bone
Line 937: Line 1,037:
While alienable possessors are in Tone Class 1 e.g.
While alienable possessors are in Tone Class 1 e.g.


/kʰwèi̤=jà áˈjòṳ/
/dô̰k=jì bâṵn/


dog=GEN.ALIENABLE bone
dog=GEN.ALIENABLE bone
Line 947: Line 1,047:




/kʰwèi̤=jà dà̰ áˈjòṳ/
/dô̰k=jì dà̰ bâṵn/


dog=GEN.ALIENABLE this bone
dog=GEN.ALIENABLE this bone


This bone of the dog's (literally "the dog's this bone").
This bone of the dog's (literally "the dog's this bone").


===Relative Clauses===
===Relative Clauses===
Line 958: Line 1,057:
In the same way as with adjectives, Kämpya places relative clauses before the head noun if they are restrictive, and after the noun if they are non-restrictive e.g.
In the same way as with adjectives, Kämpya places relative clauses before the head noun if they are restrictive, and after the noun if they are non-restrictive e.g.


/gáʔɾ=zù káiʔk kʰwèi̤ pjèi̤/
/ˈlḭ̂zàd=zù bíʔ dô̰k áˈwâḭ/


lizard=ERG bite dog flee
lizard=ERG bite dog flee
Line 967: Line 1,066:
Or, using a non-restrictive relative clause:
Or, using a non-restrictive relative clause:


/kʰwèi̤ gáʔɾ=zù káiʔk pjèi̤/
/dô̰k ˈlḭ̂zàd=zù bíʔ áˈwâḭ/


dog lizard=ERG bite flee
dog lizard=ERG bite flee
Line 977: Line 1,076:




/θú=káiʔk gáʔɾ pjèi̤/
/θú=bíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd áˈwâḭ/


ANTIP=bite lizard flee
ANTIP=bite lizard flee
Line 986: Line 1,085:
Or in a non-restrictive relative clause:
Or in a non-restrictive relative clause:


/gáʔɾ θú=káiʔk pjèi̤/
/ˈlḭ̂zàd θú=bíʔ áˈwâḭ/


lizard ANTIP=bite flee
lizard ANTIP=bite flee


The lizard, which had bitten it, fled.
The lizard, which had bitten it, fled.


Or an applicative construction can be used e.g.
Or an applicative construction can be used e.g.




/gáʔɾ=zù káiʔk=dè pʰáˈzè̤t nóuʔp/
/ˈlḭ̂zàd=zù bíʔ=kà pʰò̤wè m̥ôṵ/


lizard=ERG bite=in forest small
lizard=ERG bite=LOC forest small


The forest that the lizard bit it in is small.
The forest that the lizard bit it in is small.
Line 1,005: Line 1,105:




/pʰáˈzè̤t gáʔɾ=zù káiʔk=dè nóuʔp/
/pʰò̤wè ˈlḭ̂zàd=zù bíʔ=kà m̥ôṵ/


forest lizard=ERG bite=in small
forest lizard=ERG bite=LOC small


The forest, which the lizard bit it in, is small.
The forest, which the lizard bit it in, is small.


==Mood/Evidentiality==


====Internal Heads====
While Kämpya does not mark tense or aspect, mood / evidentiality is very important (the grammar conflates the two). They are marked with a proclitic, that usually comes immediately before the verb, but can occur in many other positions.
 
It must be noted that Kämpya restrictive relative clauses are strictly speaking internally headed [http://wals.info/chapter/90]. We can only see this in antipassives and applicatives where the noun (that used to be in the absolutive case) is re-introduced as a dative argument, it follows the head noun e.g.
 
 
/θú=káiʔk gáʔɾ kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ pjèi̤/
 
ANTIP=bite lizard dog=DAT flee
 
The lizard that had bitten the dog fled. (not */θú=káiʔk kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ gáʔɾ pjèi̤/)




Or in an applicative construction:
===Negative Mood===
 
 
/gáʔɾ=zù káiʔk=dè pʰáˈzè̤t kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ nóuʔp/
 
lizard=ERG bite=in forest dog=DAT small
 
The forest that the lizard bit the dog in is small. (not */gáʔɾ=zù káiʔk=dè kʰwèi̤=jàuŋ pʰáˈzè̤t nóuʔp/)
 
 
==Negation==
 
===Basic Pattern===


The basic way to negate something is to place the clitic /na/ immediately before it e.g. from the sentence
The basic way to negate something is to place the clitic /na/ immediately before it e.g. from the sentence


/ŋí=káiʔk kʰwèi̤/
/té=bíʔ dô̰k/


2PS.ACC=bite dog.
2PS.ACC=bite dog.
Line 1,049: Line 1,129:
We can say
We can say


/ŋí=ná=káiʔk kʰwèi̤/
/té=ná=bíʔ dô̰k/


2PS.ACC=NEG=bite dog
2PS.ACC=NEG=bite dog
Line 1,058: Line 1,138:
as well as
as well as


/ná=ŋí=káiʔk kʰwèi̤/
/ná=té=bíʔ dô̰k/


NEG=2PS.ACC=bite dog
NEG=2PS.ACC=bite dog
Line 1,067: Line 1,147:
and
and


/ŋí=káiʔk ná=kʰwèi̤/
/té=bíʔ ná=dô̰k/


2PS.ACC=bite NEG=dog
2PS.ACC=bite NEG=dog
Line 1,074: Line 1,154:




However, when a noun is topicalised, it cannot be attached to /na/. So */ná́=kʰwèi̤ ŋí=káiʔk/ is ungrammatical.
However, when a noun is topicalised, it cannot be attached to /na/. So */ná́=dô̰g té=bíʔ/ is ungrammatical.




As we can see, /na/ can attach to either nouns or verbs. It can also attach to adjectives e.g.
As we can see, /na/ can attach to either nouns or verbs. It can also attach to adjectives e.g.


/ŋí=káiʔk ná=nòuʔp kʰwèi̤/
/té=bíʔ ná=m̥ôṵ dô̰k/


2PS.ACC=bite NEG=small.REST dog
2PS.ACC=bite NEG=small.REST dog
Line 1,089: Line 1,169:
And adverbs e.g.
And adverbs e.g.


/ŋí=káiʔk nà=néʔk kʰwèi̤/
/té=bíʔ nà=déiʔp dô̰k/


2PS.ACC=bite NEG=deep.ADV dog
2PS.ACC=bite NEG=deep.ADV dog
Line 1,099: Line 1,179:
However, if the word after /na/ begins with a vowel, an epenthetic /w/ is inserted e.g.
However, if the word after /na/ begins with a vowel, an epenthetic /w/ is inserted e.g.


/ŋí=náw=áˈlôṵn kʰwèi̤/
/té=náw=áˈlâṵn dô̰k/


2PS.ACC=NEG=abandon dog
2PS.ACC=NEG=abandon dog


You weren't abandoned by the dog.
You weren't abandoned by the dog.
===Necessitative Mood===
This is used to indicate that something ought to / is required to happen. It is indicated using the proclitic /ga/, or /gat/ before a vowel (from English "gotta") e.g.
/ái=gá=déˈpʰáʔɾ/
1PS.EXCL=NEC=depart
I / we (not including you) need to depart.
When attached to a 1st person inclusive pronoun, it often functions similarly to English "let's" e.g.
/wéi=gá=déˈpʰáʔɾ/
1PS.INCL=NEC=depart
Let's depart / We (including you) need to depart
When attached to a 2nd person pronoun, it often functions like an imperative e.g.
/jéi=gá=déˈpʰáʔɾ/
2PS=NEC=depart
Depart / You need to depart
Like other mood particles, /ga/ does not need to attach to a verb. It can attach to other parts of speech depending on the focus of the speaker e.g.
/jéi=déˈpʰáʔɾ gà=ˈzwéʔp/
2PS=depart NEC=fast
You need to depart quickly (in this case, it is already assumed that the listener is departing, and the speaker wishes to emphasise that it should happen quickly).




===Prohibitive Forms===
====Prohibitive Forms====


Kämpya has a special pattern to say that something is forbidden. This is to change the verb from Tone Class 1 (the normal class for verbs) to Tone Class 2 (for verbs compounded with another verb). It is then followed by the verb /nâ̰/ e.g.
Kämpya has a special pattern to say that something is forbidden. This is to use the necessitative mood, and also change the verb from Tone Class 1 (the normal class for verbs) to Tone Class 2 (for infinitives). It is then followed by the verb /nâ̰/ e.g.


/jéi=áˈlòṵn nâ̰/
/jéi=gát=áˈlàṵn nâ̰/


2PS.INTR=alone.CMPD PROH
2PS.INTR=NEC=alone.INF PROH


Don't be alone.
Don't be alone.
Line 1,119: Line 1,240:
This pattern can also be used for transitive verbs
This pattern can also be used for transitive verbs


/jô̰ kàiʔk nâ̰ kʰwèi̤/
/jô̰ gá=bìʔ nâ̰ dô̰k/
 
2PS.ERG NEC=bite.INF PROH dog


2PS.ERG bite.CMPD PROH dog
Don't you bite the dog.


Don't bite the dog.
o


It is also perfectly possible to front the argument of /nâ̰/ e.g.
It is also perfectly possible to front the argument of /nâ̰/ e.g.


/kʰwèi̤ jô̰ kàiʔk nâ̰/
/dô̰k jô̰ gá=bìʔ nâ̰/


dog 2PS.ERG bite.CMPD PROH
dog 2PS.ERG NEC=bite.INF PROH


The dog must not be bitten.
The dog must not be bitten (by you).




Other nouns can be used apart from the 2nd person pronouns e.g.
Other nouns can be used apart from the 2nd person pronouns e.g.


/ˈsíʔtà=zù kàiʔk nâ̰ kʰwèi̤/
/ˈsʰíʔtà=zù gá=bìʔ nâ̰ dô̰k/


guardian=ERG bite.CMPD PROH dog
guardian=ERG NEC=bite.INF PROH dog


The guardian must not bite the dog.
The guardian must not bite the dog.
===Optative Mood===
This is used for things that the speaker hopes will happen / have happened. It is formed with the proclitic /wana/ (or /wan/ before a vowel) e.g.
/ái=wáná=déˈpʰáʔɾ/
1PS.EXCL.INTR=OPT=depart
I / we (not including you) want to depart.
/té=wáná=bíʔ dô̰k/
2PS.ACC=OPT=bite dog
I want you to be bitten by the dog.
/té=bíʔ wáná=dô̰k/
2PS.ACC bite OPT=dog
I want you to be bitten by the '''dog''' (and not another animal).
/té=bíʔ wáná=m̥ôṵ dô̰k/
2PS.ACC bite OPT=small.REST dog
I want you to be bitten by the '''small''' dog (and not a big one).
===Conditional Mood===
This is used for situations which may not necessarily come true / have true, but are dependent on something else. It is marked with the proclitic /kau/ (or /kaw- before a vowel). The origin of this proclitic is the Thai particle /kɔ̂ː/ e.g.
/ái=káu=déˈpʰáʔɾ/
1PS.EXCL.INTR=COND=depart
I / we (not including you) would depart (if something else happens).
/ái=déˈpʰáʔɾ kò=ˈzwéʔpìd/
1PS.EXCL.INTR depart COND=fast
I/ we (not including you) would depart quickly (but unless some other event happens, it will be slow)
Sentences in the conditional mood can occur after sentences with another mood. In this case, the event described in the conditional mood only happens if the preceding sentence comes true e.g.
/jéi=wáná=déˈpʰáʔɾ ái=káw=áˈlâṵn/
2PS.INTR=OPT=depart COND=1PS.EXCL=alone
I want you to leave so I / we (not including you) can be alone.
===Hypothetical Mood===
The proclitic /pʰí/ (/ípʰ/ before a vowel) is used for hypothetical and counterfactual situations. It often corresponds to cases where English would use "if" (which it is indeed cognate to) e.g.
/jéi=pí=déˈpʰáʔɾ/
2PS.INTR=HYP=depart
If you depart ...
A clause in the hypothetical mood is very often followed up with a clause in the conditional mood e.g.
/jéi=pí=déˈpʰáʔɾ ái=káw=áˈlâṵn/
2PS.INTR=HYP=depart COND=1PS.EXCL=alone
If you leave, I / we (not including you) will be alone.
Notice in both of the above sentences, Grassman's law has resulted in a loss of aspiration on the prefix, so /pʰí/ becomes /pí/
===Direct Evidential===
If a speaker is reporting something that they have experienced, then no clitic is used e.g.
/dô̰k áˈlâṵn/
dog alone
The dog is alone (maybe the speaker can see it)
===Reportative Evidential===
If the speaker is reporting information that someone else told them, the proclitic /sʰái/ (/sʰáj/ before a vowel) is used. This is etymologically related to English "say" e.g.
/dô̰k sʰáj=áˈlâṵn/
dog REP=alone
I've been told that the dog is alone.
/áˈlâṵn sʰái=dô̰k/
alone REP=dog
I've been told that it is the dog that is alone.
===Inferential Evidential===
If the speaker is arriving at a judgment based on some kind of direct physical evidence, then the proclitic /ge/ is used (/ges/ before a vowel). This is etymologically related to English "guess" e.g.
/dô̰k gés=áˈlâṵn/
dog INFR=alone
The dog must be alone (maybe the speaker sees only a single set of dog footprints)
===Assumptive Mood===
This is used when the speaker is making an assertion based on their experience with similar situations, or when (at least in their judgement), the situation is general knowledge. It uses the proclitic /mat/ (/mats/ before a vowel). This is etymologically related to English "does" e.g.
/sôṵlà máts=áʔp/
sun ASS=rise
The sun rises (the speaker is referring to a well known fact).
Compare the above sentence to one without an evidential particle e.g.
/sôṵlà áʔp/
sun rise
The sun has risen (the speaker has seen it).
===Interrogative Mood===
This is used for polar questions (those expecting a yes/no answer). It is formed with the clitic /dú/ (etymologically related to English "do") e.g.
/té=dú=bíʔ dô̰k/
2PS.ACC=POLQ=bite dog
Were you bitten by the dog?
as well as
/dú=té=bíʔ dô̰k/
POLQ=2PS.ACC=bite dog
Were '''you''' weren't bitten by the dog? / Was it you that was bitten by the dog?
and
/té=bíʔ dú=dô̰k/
2PS.ACC=bite POLQ=dog
Were you bitten by '''the dog'''? Was it the dog that bit you?
Like with /na/, /du/ can also attach to adjectives e.g.
/té=bíʔ dú=m̥òṵ dô̰k/
2PS.ACC=bite POLQ=small.REST dog
Were you bitten by the '''small''' dog? / Was it the '''small''' dog that bit you?? (or were you bitten by the big dog?)
And adverbs e.g.
/té=bíʔ dù=déiʔp dô̰k/
2PS.ACC=bite POLQ=deep.ADV dog
Were you bitten '''deeply''' by the dog? (or was it a shallow bite?)
However, if the word after /du/ begins with a vowel, an epenthetic /w/ is inserted e.g.
/té=dúw=áˈlâṵn dô̰k/
2PS.ACC=POLQ=abandon dog
You weren't abandoned by the dog.
==Responses to Polar Questions==
To answer a polar question in the negative, the particle /nâ̰/ is used e.g.
A) /dô̰k dú=bíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog POLQ=bite lizard
Did the dog bite the lizard?
B) /nâ̰/
no
No
Answering a polar question in the affirmative is more complicated. There is no single word corresponding to English "yes". The answer depends on why the speaker believes the answer to be true.
If the speaker has seen or participated in the action, then they simply repeat whatever came after /du/ in the question e.g.
A) /dô̰k dú=bíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog POLQ=bite lizard
Did the dog bite the lizard?
B) /bíʔ/
bite
Yes (I saw it)
But in other cases, there are special particles (related to the evidential/mood clitics). If the speaker believes the answer to be yes because someone told them so, then the particle /hḭ̂/ is used e.g.
A) /dô̰k dú=bíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog POLQ=bite lizard
Did the dog bite the lizard?
B) /hḭ̂/
REP
Yes / I've heard so.
If the speaker believes the answer to be yes because there is direct physical evidence, they use the particle /gè̤/ e.g.
A) /dô̰k dú=bíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog POLQ=bite lizard
Did the dog bite the lizard?
B) /gè̤/
INFR
Yes / It looks like it (maybe there is a bite mark on the lizard)
If the speaker believes the answer to be yes because of their experience with similar situations, or because it is general knowledge, they use the particle /mà̤t/ e.g.
A) /dô̰k dú=bíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog POLQ=bite lizard
Did the dog bite the lizard?
B) /mà̤t/
ASS
Yes / I believe so (maybe because the dog regularly bites the lizard)
If the question entails an assumption that the speaker wishes to deny the truth of, then a special particle /pàṳ/ is used e.g.
A) /jó=wòṳ jô̰ báˈsjàʔp dú=tóʔp/
2PS.GEN=wife 2PS.ERG beat.INF POLQ=stop
Have you stopped beating your wife?
B) /pàṳ/
CHALLENGE.PRESUPPOSITION
I wasn't beating my wife.
If the speaker doesn't know the answer to a question, they can answer with the particle /dṵ̂/ e.g.
A) /dô̰k dú=bíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog POLQ=bite lizard
Did the dog bite the lizard?
B) /dṵ̂/
POLQ
I don't know either.
==Wh-Questions==
These are formed by using interrogative pronouns. There is no distinction between "who" and "what" e.g.
/báj=ˈḛ̂nèm/
Q.INTR=enemy
Who / What is the enemy?
or
/ˈbwḛ̀lí=hwám bá=ˈdéˈpʰáʔɾ/
Hkonat=from Q.INTR=depart
Who / What departed from the valley?
/hwéi=ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
Q.ERG=bite lizard
Who / What bit the lizard?
/ké=ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
Q.ACC=bite lizard
Who / What did the lizard bite? (because the verb takes a pronoun, the word for lizard does not take the ergative case)
/ˈsʰíʔtà ˈkèʔ=ɾí dò̰k=gó θú=gḭ̂p/
guardian Q.ACC=SEC dog=DAT ANTIP=give
Who / What did the guardian give to the dog?
When English would use a word such as "where" or "when", Kämpya instead uses /kḛ̀/ (the accusative emphatic interrogative pronoun) with a postposition e.g.
/ˈḛ̂nèm ˈkḛ̀=hwám déˈpʰáʔɾ/
enemy Q.ACC=from depart
Where did the enemy depart from?
/dô̰k=zù ˈkḛ̀=wé ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog=ERG Q.ACC=TEM bite lizard
When did the dog bite the lizard?
/dô̰k=zù ˈkèʔ=ⱱíŋ ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog=ERG Q.ACC=INS bite lizard
How did the dog bite the lizard?
/dô̰k=zù ˈkèʔ=há ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog=ERG Q.ACC=LOC bite lizard
Where did the dog bite the lizard?
===Asking about Possessors===
Kämpya has no word meaning "whose". Instead it is necessary to ask "Who has ...?", combined with a relative clause e.g.
/dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd éi=ˈhḛ̂b/
dog=ERG bite lizard Q.ERG=have
Whose lizard did the dog bite? (literally "Who has the lizard that the dog bit?")
or
/ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ dô̰k éi=ˈhḛ̂b/
lizard=DAT ANTIP=bite dog Q.ERG=have
Whose dog bit the lizard? (literally "Who has the dog that bit the lizard?")
===Other Interrogatives that modify noun phrases===
To ask questions like "Which lizard did the dog bite?", attach the clitic bá- (or báj- before a vowel) to the noun being asked about e.g.
/dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ bá=ˈlḭ̂zàd/
dog=ERG bite Q.INTR=lizard
Which lizard did the dog bite?
However, bá- can only attach to a noun in the absolutive case. To ask about the subject of a transitive verb, it is necessary to antipassivise the verb. e.g.
/ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ bá=dô̰k/
ANTIP=bite Q.INTR=dog lizard=DAT
Which dog bit the lizard?
Attaching the clitic to a noun in the ergative case is ungrammatical e.g. */bá=dô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ lḭ̂zàd/. Also the clitic cannot attach to a topicalised noun e.g. */bá=dô̰k ˈlḭ̀zád=gó θú=ˈbíʔ/.
To ask about the object of a postposition, an applicative construction is needed e.g.
/ˈlḭ̂zàd=zù dò̰k=gó ˈbíʔ=kà bá=pʰò̤wè /
lizard=ERG dog=DAT bite=LOC which=forest
Which forest did the lizard bite the dog in?
==Verb Subordination==
The subordinate clause is always placed at the end of the sentence. The superordinate verb takes a pronominal prefix to mark whether the subordinate verb is the accusative, ergative or intransitive argument of the verb:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! Accusative !! Ergative !! Intransitive
|-
| Before a consonant || nó || njá || sí
|-
| Before a vowel || ón- || áŋ- || íts-
|-
| Emphatic || nò̰ || njà̰ || ì̤t
|}
For example, from the sentence:
/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù sʰái=ˈsâ̰pè míʔnà/
mother=ERG REP=know everyone
I've heard the mother knows everyone.
We can replace the object with a pronoun to get
/múˈhḛ̂ lé=sʰái=ˈsâ̰pè/
mother 1PS.INCL.ACC=REP=know
I've heard the mother knows us (including you).
If there is a subordinate clause, then the accusative pronoun is replaced with /nó/ e.g.
/múˈhḛ̂ nó=sʰái=ˈsâ̰pè ˈdô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
mother SBRD.ACC=REP=know dog=ERG bite lizard
I've heard the mother knows the dog bit the lizard.
If the superordinate clause's absolutive argument is also the topic of the subordinate clause, then it does not need to be mentioned twice e.g.
/múˈhḛ̂ nó=sʰái=ˈsâ̰pè ˈdô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ/
mother SBRD.ACC=REP=know dog=ERG bite
I've heard the mother knows the dog bit her.
It would be redundant to say something like ?/múˈhḛ̂ nó=hí=ˈsâ̰pè ˈdô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ mùˈhḛ̂/.
And another example using a postposition:
/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù ˈnòʔ=ɾá péiʔk kʰḭ̂d ˈdô̰k=zù ˈbíʔ ˈlḭ̂zàd/
mother=ERG SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC speak child dog=ERG bite lizard
The mother told the child that the dog bit the lizard.
And as before, the absolutive argument of the superordinate clause can be the topic of the subordinate clause e.g.
/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù ˈnòʔ=ɾá péiʔk kʰḭ̂d wá=bàṵn=tá gá=gḭ̂p dô̰k/
mother=ERG SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC speak child INDEF=bone=SEC NEC=give dog
The mother told the child that he / she (the child) must give the dog a bone.
/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk wá=bàṵn=tá gá=gḭ̂p dô̰k/
mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak  INDEF=bone=SEC NEC=give dog
The mother told the child that she (the mother) must give the dog a bone.
Note that the subordinate clause must be marked for evidentiality (always from the speaker's point of view). Compare the above sentence with:
/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk tí=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/
mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT  ANTIP=speak INDEF=bone=SEC give dog
The mother told the child that she (the mother) gave the dog a bone (the speaker saw the act of giving).
/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=péiʔk tí=bàṵn=tá sʰái=gḭ̂p dô̰k/
mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak  INDEF=bone=SEC REP=give dog
The mother told the child that she (the mother) gave the dog a bone (the speaker didn't see the act of giving, but heard about it).
====Anti-Logophoricity====
If the subordinate clause contains a transitive verb, then the 3rd person obviative ergative pronoun ðjíʔ can be used as a kind of "anti-logophoric" pronoun [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logophoricity] to indicate that subject of the subordinate clause's transitive verb is not the absolutive argument of the main clause.
So if the above 2 sentences take ðjíʔ, then they become:
/múˈhḛ̂=ɾù ˈnòʔ=ɾá péiʔk ˈkʰḭ̂d ðjíʔ tí=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/
mother=ERG SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC speak child 3PS.OBV.ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give dog
The mother told the child that he / she (someone other than the child, either the mother or someone else) gave the dog a bone.
/múˈhḛ̂ ˈnòʔ=ɾá ˈkʰḭ̀d=gó θú=ˈpéiʔkðjíʔ tí=bàṵn=tá gḭ̂p dô̰k/
mother SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC child=DAT ANTIP=speak 3PS.OBV.ERG INDEF=bone=SEC give dog
The mother told the child that he / she (someone other than the mother, either the child or someone else) gave the dog a bone.
===Evidentials and Reported Speech===
====Indirect Reported Speech====
In this case, when reporting what someone else has said, both clauses need to marked for evidentiality, both from the point of view of the speaker e.g.
/ˈkʰḭ̂d ˈnòʔ=ɾá mí=ˈpéiʔk ˈḛ̂nèm déˈpʰáʔɾ/
child SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC 1PS.EXCL.ACC=speak enemy depart
The child told me the enemy had departed (and I saw it happen too).
If the speaker is reporting an event that someone told them about, but that they have not seen themselves, then they need to use an evidential in the subordinate clause e.g.
/ˈkʰḭ̂d ˈnòʔ=ɾá mí=ˈpéiʔk ˈḛ̂nèm sái=déˈpʰáʔɾ/
child SBRD.ACC.EMP=SEC 1PS.EXCL.ACC=speak enemy REP=depart
The child told me the enemy had departed (but I didn't see it, I just heard about it).
====Direct Reported Speech====
In this case, there is no superordinate verb marking. The quoted speech is places at the end of the sentence, preceded by the particle /ðéʔ/ and followed by the particle /tḛ̂/ e.g.
/ˈkʰḭ̂d mí=ˈpéiʔk ðéʔ ˈḛ̂nèm déˈpʰáʔɾ tḛ̂/
child 1PS.EXCL.ACC=speak QUOTE enemy depart QUOTE
The child told me that the enemy had departed
In the above sentence, the speaker is saying the the child had used the direct evidential when reporting the enemy's departure, meaning that the speaker is reporting that the child implied that they had witnessed it themselves. This sentence conveys no information about whether or not the speaker had also seen the departure.
Compare:
/ˈkʰḭ̂d mí=ˈpéiʔk ðéʔ ˈḛ̂nèm sái=déˈpʰáʔɾ tḛ̂/
child 1PS.EXCL.ACC=speak QUOTE enemy REP=depart QUOTE
The child told me that he had heard that the enemy had departed (and not witnessed it himself).
==Comparative Constructions==
To say "more than ...", Kämpya speakers say ... /tʰáp/, where /tʰáp/ is a postpositional clitic that also means "above" e.g.
/dô̰k ˈlḭ̀zád=tʰáp zwéʔp/
dog.TOP lizard=above fast
Dogs are faster than lizards (literally "Dogs are fast above lizards").
[[Category:Languages]]
[[Category:{{PAGENAME}}]]
Учхљёная
3,197

edits

Retrieved from "https://linguifex.com/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/15433...176446"

Navigation menu