Eighth edition lekma: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 202: Line 202:
| That  || written on side note are, made etymologies.  
| That  || written on side note are, made etymologies.  
|}
|}


{| class='float'  
{| class='float'  
Line 287: Line 286:
| <center>/ || separator || An intonation or a 'space'/'edge' meant a boundary between words.  
| <center>/ || separator || An intonation or a 'space'/'edge' meant a boundary between words.  
|}
|}


{| class='float'  
{| class='float'  
|-
|
|-
|
|-
|
|-
|
|-
|
|-
|
|-
|-
|Tense/usual/lax are basically allophonemes.
|Tense/usual/lax are basically allophonemes.
Line 305: Line 315:
|<sup>xxx</sup>/<sup>XX</sup>, are language/country codes of reality if needed, used along lekmae words. Formation was to pick if <ekm> meant 'lekmae', <CT> meant 'Kutarutchu' were real things then, <<sup>ekm-CT</sup>> is 'lekmae language spoken in Kutarutchu land', that <<sup>ekm.</sup>neu> 'lekmae-language' is the lekmae, <<sup>CT.</sup>sok> 'Kutarutchu-land' is the 'land of Kutarutchu'. They are <ekm.neu>, <CT.sok> in usual situations.
|<sup>xxx</sup>/<sup>XX</sup>, are language/country codes of reality if needed, used along lekmae words. Formation was to pick if <ekm> meant 'lekmae', <CT> meant 'Kutarutchu' were real things then, <<sup>ekm-CT</sup>> is 'lekmae language spoken in Kutarutchu land', that <<sup>ekm.</sup>neu> 'lekmae-language' is the lekmae, <<sup>CT.</sup>sok> 'Kutarutchu-land' is the 'land of Kutarutchu'. They are <ekm.neu>, <CT.sok> in usual situations.
|}
|}




580

edits

Navigation menu