5,486
edits
Vadi: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Body Parts
| Line 374: | Line 374: | ||
At least in the case of body parts, there does appear to be some sort of gender marking on special [[Vadi#Number| singulative ]] forms, ''-ri'' and ''-ka'' for the singulative, and ''-(h)a'' on plural forms. These nouns also demonstrate an interesting split on the [[Vadi#Number| number system]], since Vadi, which otherwise exhibits no plural pattern in other nouns, has an explicit plural for body parts that normally are singular e.g. the head, nose, mouth, etc. It is believed that in Vadi's prehistory, the ''-ri'' forms indicated animate nouns, whilst the ''-ka'' forms indicated inanimate nouns. However, both the Aħħur and Kalapái texts show that syncretism had taken place. | At least in the case of body parts, there does appear to be some sort of gender marking on special [[Vadi#Number| singulative ]] forms, ''-ri'' and ''-ka'' for the singulative, and ''-(h)a'' on plural forms. These nouns also demonstrate an interesting split on the [[Vadi#Number| number system]], since Vadi, which otherwise exhibits no plural pattern in other nouns, has an explicit plural for body parts that normally are singular e.g. the head, nose, mouth, etc. It is believed that in Vadi's prehistory, the ''-ri'' forms indicated animate nouns, whilst the ''-ka'' forms indicated inanimate nouns. However, both the Aħħur and Kalapái texts show that syncretism had taken place. | ||
The Šibbūru School believes these divergent forms belong to a distinct noun classes, whereas the Traditionalists believe Vadi had lost its gender or noun class system in its prehistory, and these differentiated forms are simply fossil remnants of that system. The Traditionalist view is problematic, though, because at least in the case of body parts, certain nouns select '' | The Šibbūru School believes these divergent forms belong to a distinct noun classes, whereas the Traditionalists believe Vadi had lost its gender or noun class system in its prehistory, and these differentiated forms are simply fossil remnants of that system. The Traditionalist view is problematic, though, because at least in the case of body parts, certain nouns select ''kaidon'' while others select ''kaika'', both which mean "which". | ||
{| class="bluetable lightbluebg" | {| class="bluetable lightbluebg" | ||
| Line 383: | Line 383: | ||
! Unmarked | ! Unmarked | ||
! Plural | ! Plural | ||
! ''Kaidon/Kaika'' Selection | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Head | ! Head | ||
| Line 388: | Line 389: | ||
| jidár | | jidár | ||
| jidárha | | jidárha | ||
| kaidon | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Eye | ! Eye | ||
| Line 393: | Line 395: | ||
| kulun | | kulun | ||
| -- | | -- | ||
| kaika | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Ear | ! Ear | ||
| Line 398: | Line 401: | ||
| taka | | taka | ||
| -- | | -- | ||
| kaidon | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Nose | ! Nose | ||
| Line 403: | Line 407: | ||
| uvaz | | uvaz | ||
| uváza | | uváza | ||
| kaidon | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Heart | ! Heart | ||
| -- | | -- | ||
| gilay | | gilay | ||
| gilaya | | gilaya | ||
| kaika | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Hair | ! Hair | ||
| Line 413: | Line 419: | ||
| varlat (Schumann)<br/>vajlat (Tashunka) | | varlat (Schumann)<br/>vajlat (Tashunka) | ||
| -- | | -- | ||
| kaidon | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Lips | ! Lips | ||
| Line 418: | Line 425: | ||
| tuntu | | tuntu | ||
| -- | | -- | ||
| kaika | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Tongue | ! Tongue | ||
| Line 423: | Line 431: | ||
| nipáz | | nipáz | ||
| nipáza | | nipáza | ||
| kaika | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Finger | ! Finger | ||
| Line 428: | Line 437: | ||
| pata | | pata | ||
| -- | | -- | ||
| kaika | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Hand | ! Hand | ||
| Line 433: | Line 443: | ||
| uzap | | uzap | ||
| -- | | -- | ||
| kaika | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Testicle | ! Testicle | ||
| Line 438: | Line 449: | ||
| vula | | vula | ||
| -- | | -- | ||
| kaidon | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Penis | ! Penis | ||
| Line 443: | Line 455: | ||
| niat | | niat | ||
| niata | | niata | ||
| kaidon | |||
|} | |} | ||