Kihā́mmic: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1,942: Line 1,942:
The present indicative is used much as the present tense is in French or Spanish (and also as in English, see also [[#Continuous|continuous]]).
The present indicative is used much as the present tense is in French or Spanish (and also as in English, see also [[#Continuous|continuous]]).


The past imperfect describes an action that occurred in the past and that may also still be going on. The past perfect describes an action in the past that has finished or was a momentary action, such as an explosion. The pluperfect is similar to the perfect but is used to convey actions that are more remote to the present than does the past perfect, it is often used in sequences of tenses.
The past imperfect describes an action that occurred in the past and that may also still be going on. The past perfect describes an action in the past that has finished or was a momentary action, such as an explosion. The pluperfect is similar to the perfect but is used to convey actions that are more remote to the present than does the past perfect, it is often used in sequences of tenses in literary registers but is seldom used in spoken language.


The future imperfect is used to describe an action that will occur in the future but gives no clue as to whether this action will be completed. The future perfect describes an action that will be completed in the future, this also includes momentary actions.
The future imperfect is used to describe an action that will occur in the future but gives no clue as to whether this action will be completed. The future perfect describes an action that will be completed in the future, this also includes momentary actions.

Navigation menu