Verse:Irta/Music: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 59: Line 59:


Triadic polyphony in Irta evolved mainly from folk adaptations of Second Remonitionist polyphony, with melodic tendencies as in our timeline's "expressive intonation" resulting in a roughly 12 tone division of the octave. A notable difference is that the piano isn't as prominent -- in contrast, string ensembles and voice are given precedence which makes the classical idea of intonation in Irta much more fluid than in our timeline, with theorists often acknowledging subtle variations of a note, and there are various proposals to explain intonation in Irtan classical music. Intonational variation correlates with:  
Triadic polyphony in Irta evolved mainly from folk adaptations of Second Remonitionist polyphony, with melodic tendencies as in our timeline's "expressive intonation" resulting in a roughly 12 tone division of the octave. A notable difference is that the piano isn't as prominent -- in contrast, string ensembles and voice are given precedence which makes the classical idea of intonation in Irta much more fluid than in our timeline, with theorists often acknowledging subtle variations of a note, and there are various proposals to explain intonation in Irtan classical music. Intonational variation correlates with:  
* scalar and harmonic context,
* the placement of notes within a phrase, as well as scalar and harmonic context,
* mood, and
* mood, and
* region (e.g. western parts of Hyperfrance use wider leading tones and narrower fifths compared to Riphea). This makes it especially hard for Irtan classical composers to codify an intonational system.
* region (e.g. western parts of Hyperfrance use wider leading tones and narrower fifths compared to Riphea). This makes it especially hard for Irtan classical composers to codify an intonational system.
7,731

edits

Navigation menu