Proto-Tungric: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 1,713: Line 1,713:
! 1S !! 2S !! 3S !! 1P !! 2P !! 3P
! 1S !! 2S !! 3S !! 1P !! 2P !! 3P
|-
|-
| -bǭ || -bōz || -bōd || -bōmaz || -bōþiz || -bōnd
| *-bǭ || *-bōz || *-bōd || *-bōmaz || *-bōþiz || *-bōnd
|-
|-
|}
|}
Line 1,723: Line 1,723:
<!--
<!--
#'''Class 1:'''  
#'''Class 1:'''  
#*The present stem contained a ''-(i)j-'' and was conjugated in the same way as strong ''j''-presents.
#*The present stem contained a *''-(i)j-'' and was conjugated in the same way as strong ''j''-presents.
#*The past indicative had the connector vowel ''-(i)ja-''.
#*The past indicative had the connector vowel ''-(i)ja-''.
-
-
Line 1,748: Line 1,748:


The past indicative had a connector vowel *''-a-'', and the past subjunctive had a connector vowel *''-i-''. The past participle had no connector vowel.
The past indicative had a connector vowel *''-a-'', and the past subjunctive had a connector vowel *''-i-''. The past participle had no connector vowel.
====Preterite-present verbs====
====Preterite-present verbs====
Preterite-present verbs were verbs whose present tenses conjugated as a strong past (of any class). Preterite-present verbs had weak pasts.
Preterite-present verbs were verbs whose present tenses conjugated as a strong past (of any class). Preterite-present verbs had weak pasts.
7,081

edits

Navigation menu