Moshurian: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
26 bytes removed ,  20 October 2023
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 60: Line 60:
Both of these interpretations are considered simply as urban legend, as orthographic analysis of the ''Izkanà''(one of the earliest Moshurian documents) by calligraphers showed that the early Moshurian alphabet had many similarities with the logographic Oalanii<ref>''Oalanii'' is an archeological term used to describe the Proto-Taskaric inhabitants of what is now the city of Oalan. Although the Oalanii had their own script, no surviving documentation mentions their actual endonym, so they are called the Oalanii after the city where the first archeological remains of ancient Oalan were found.</ref> script, which may have influenced Munsanukh orthographies as a whole.  
Both of these interpretations are considered simply as urban legend, as orthographic analysis of the ''Izkanà''(one of the earliest Moshurian documents) by calligraphers showed that the early Moshurian alphabet had many similarities with the logographic Oalanii<ref>''Oalanii'' is an archeological term used to describe the Proto-Taskaric inhabitants of what is now the city of Oalan. Although the Oalanii had their own script, no surviving documentation mentions their actual endonym, so they are called the Oalanii after the city where the first archeological remains of ancient Oalan were found.</ref> script, which may have influenced Munsanukh orthographies as a whole.  


In fact, the glyph for /b/ may be descended from the Oalanii glyph for the word ''*ʔbVn'', meaning "tree", which influenced its shape.
The glyphs for /b/ comes from Oalanii ''*ʕbạn'', while the glyph for /d/ comes from Oalanii ''*dḕmsir''.


===Consonants===
===Consonants===
2,753

edits

Navigation menu