1,599
edits
Germian: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Verb conjugations
| Line 520: | Line 520: | ||
|sain ⇄ am/is/are | |sain ⇄ am/is/are | ||
|sain'''e''' ⇄ being | |sain'''e''' ⇄ being | ||
|'''ha'''sain ⇄ have/has been | |'''ha'''sain'''en''' ⇄ have/has been | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 526: | Line 526: | ||
|sain'''d''' ⇄ was/were | |sain'''d''' ⇄ was/were | ||
|sain'''de''' ⇄ was/were being | |sain'''de''' ⇄ was/were being | ||
|'''had'''sain ⇄ had been | |'''had'''sain'''en''' ⇄ had been | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 532: | Line 532: | ||
|'''vil''' sain ⇄ will be | |'''vil''' sain ⇄ will be | ||
|'''vil''' sain'''e''' ⇄ will become | |'''vil''' sain'''e''' ⇄ will become | ||
|'''vil''' '''ha'''sain ⇄ will have been | |'''vil''' '''ha'''sain'''en''' ⇄ will have been | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 538: | Line 538: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|'''skalde''' '''ha'''sain ⇄ would have been | |'''skalde''' '''ha'''sain'''en''' ⇄ would have been | ||
|'''skalde''' sain ⇄ would be | |'''skalde''' sain ⇄ would be | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 554: | Line 554: | ||
|dun ⇄ do | |dun ⇄ do | ||
|dun'''e''' ⇄ doing | |dun'''e''' ⇄ doing | ||
|'''ha'''dun ⇄ have/has done | |'''ha'''dun'''en''' ⇄ have/has done | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 560: | Line 560: | ||
|dun'''d''' ⇄ did | |dun'''d''' ⇄ did | ||
|dun'''de''' ⇄ was/were doing | |dun'''de''' ⇄ was/were doing | ||
|'''had'''dun ⇄ had done | |'''had'''dun'''en''' ⇄ had done | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 566: | Line 566: | ||
|'''vil''' dun ⇄ will do | |'''vil''' dun ⇄ will do | ||
|'''vil''' dun'''e''' ⇄ will be doing | |'''vil''' dun'''e''' ⇄ will be doing | ||
|'''vil''' '''ha'''dun ⇄ will have done | |'''vil''' '''ha'''dun'''en''' ⇄ will have done | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 572: | Line 572: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|'''skalde''' '''ha'''dun ⇄ would have done | |'''skalde''' '''ha'''dun'''en''' ⇄ would have done | ||
|'''skalde''' dun ⇄ would do | |'''skalde''' dun ⇄ would do | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 588: | Line 588: | ||
|hav ⇄ have | |hav ⇄ have | ||
|hav'''e''' ⇄ having | |hav'''e''' ⇄ having | ||
|'''ha'''hav ⇄ have/has had | |'''ha'''hav'''en''' ⇄ have/has had | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 594: | Line 594: | ||
|hav'''d''' ⇄ had | |hav'''d''' ⇄ had | ||
|hav'''de''' ⇄ was/were having | |hav'''de''' ⇄ was/were having | ||
|'''had'''hav ⇄ had had | |'''had'''hav'''en''' ⇄ had had | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 600: | Line 600: | ||
|'''vil''' hav ⇄ will have | |'''vil''' hav ⇄ will have | ||
|'''vil''' hav'''e''' ⇄ will be having | |'''vil''' hav'''e''' ⇄ will be having | ||
|'''vil''' '''ha'''hav ⇄ will have had | |'''vil''' '''ha'''hav'''en''' ⇄ will have had | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 606: | Line 606: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|'''skalde''' '''ha'''hav ⇄ would have had | |'''skalde''' '''ha'''hav'''en''' ⇄ would have had | ||
|'''skalde''' hav ⇄ would have | |'''skalde''' hav ⇄ would have | ||
|- | |- | ||