27
edits
Yama-pali-auk: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→affixes: slight correction regarding the new negation suffix
m (→grammar: updated negation suffix) |
m (→affixes: slight correction regarding the new negation suffix) |
||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
|} | |} | ||
when applying a vowel-initial suffix to a word that ends in a vowel, the original vowel is overwritten by the suffix's vowel. also, the two copulae (tek and muk, "to be" and "to be at" respectively) have the ''k'' removed. <br> | when applying a vowel-initial suffix to a word that ends in a vowel, the original vowel is overwritten by the suffix's vowel. also, the two copulae (tek and muk, "to be" and "to be at" respectively) have the ''k'' removed. <br> | ||
'' | ''-el'' may be applied before or after any other suffixes, depending on what feels right for what you wish to say. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ pronouns | |+ pronouns | ||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
|} | |} | ||
technically, you could analyze the pronouns as just single letters taking the noun suffixes. however, it would not make sense to apply the verb suffixes to ''m-'', ''t-'', or ''w-'', especially because of how ''tek'' and ''muk'' take their suffixes. | technically, you could analyze the pronouns as just single letters taking the noun suffixes. however, it would not make sense to apply the verb suffixes to ''m-'', ''t-'', or ''w-'', especially because of how ''tek'' and ''muk'' take their suffixes. | ||
=== punctuation === | === punctuation === | ||
this part is why i don't like using the romanization. some of the common characters are hard to type, and it looks bad with the latin script. | this part is why i don't like using the romanization. some of the common characters are hard to type, and it looks bad with the latin script. | ||