1,043
edits
Line 246: | Line 246: | ||
|/u/→/u/ | |/u/→/u/ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|/y/→/u/ | |||
|/ʉ/→/u/ | |||
|/ɯ/→/i/ | |/ɯ/→/i/ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|/e/→/e/ | |/e/→/e/ | ||
Line 254: | Line 254: | ||
|/o/→/o/ | |/o/→/o/ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|/ø/→/o/ | |||
|/ʊ/→/o/ | |||
|/ɤ/→/e/ | |/ɤ/→/e/ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|/e̞/→/i/ | |||
|/ə/→/ə/ | |||
|/o̞/→/u/ | |/o̞/→/u/ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|/ɛ/→/a/ | |||
|/ɐ/→/a/ | |||
|/ɔ/→/a/ | |/ɔ/→/a/ | ||
|- | |- | ||
|/æ/→/e/ | |||
|/a/→/a/ | |||
|/ɒ/→/o/ | |/ɒ/→/o/ | ||
|} | |} | ||
In Morphology, Aryan introduced a series of innovations by mixing and developing peculiarities from different Paleolithic Codes. The Hyperborean nominative ''-s'' for example was probably borrowed via another caucasian substrate, which completely assumed the role of epenthetic root in the construction "<small>ROOT</small><sub>1</sub> <small>ROOT</small><sub>2</sub>". Primordial ''[ˈn̠ʕih ˈə]'' would therefore yield ''*knaiás'' (=*knaí *ás) [PIE ''*sénos'']. Furthermore | In Morphology, Aryan introduced a series of innovations by mixing and developing peculiarities from different Paleolithic Codes. The Hyperborean nominative ''-s'' for example was probably borrowed via another caucasian substrate, which completely assumed the role of epenthetic root in the construction "<small>ROOT</small><sub>1</sub> <small>ROOT</small><sub>2</sub>". Primordial ''[ˈn̠ʕih ˈə]'' "old" would therefore yield ''*knaiás'' "old" (=*knaí *ás) [PIE ''*sénos'' "old"]. Furthermore, this development culminated into the Indo-European Ablaut. That is: when the accent falls into the epenthetic root, the first root suffers a phonetic change influenced by the interaction between laryngeals and vowels | ||
the adjective construction of Pangaean [ROOT1 ROOT2 | the adjective construction of Pangaean [ROOT1 ROOT2 |
edits