Aryan: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 246: Line 246:
|/u/→/u/
|/u/→/u/
|-
|-
|/y/→/u/
|/ʉ/→/u/
|/ɯ/→/i/
|/ɯ/→/i/
|/ʉ/→/u/
|/y/→/u/
|-
|-
|/e/→/e/
|/e/→/e/
Line 254: Line 254:
|/o/→/o/
|/o/→/o/
|-
|-
|/ø/→/o/
|/ʊ/→/o/
|/ɤ/→/e/
|/ɤ/→/e/
|/ʊ/→/o/
|/ø/→/o/
|-
|-
|/e̞/→/i/
|/ə/→/ə/
|/o̞/→/u/
|/o̞/→/u/
|/ə/→/ə/
|/e̞/→/i/
|-
|-
|/ɛ/→/a/
|/ɐ/→/a/
|/ɔ/→/a/
|/ɔ/→/a/
|/ɐ/→/a/
|/ɛ/→/a/
|-
|-
|/æ/→/e/
|/a/→/a/
|/ɒ/→/o/
|/ɒ/→/o/
|/a/→/a/
|/æ/→/e/
|}
|}


In Morphology, Aryan introduced a series of innovations by mixing and developing peculiarities from different Paleolithic Codes. The Hyperborean nominative ''-s'' for example was probably borrowed via another caucasian substrate, which completely  assumed the role of epenthetic root in the construction "<small>ROOT</small><sub>1</sub> <small>ROOT</small><sub>2</sub>". Primordial ''[ˈn̠ʕih ˈə]'' would therefore yield ''*knaiás'' (=*knaí *ás) [PIE ''*sénos'']. Furthermore
In Morphology, Aryan introduced a series of innovations by mixing and developing peculiarities from different Paleolithic Codes. The Hyperborean nominative ''-s'' for example was probably borrowed via another caucasian substrate, which completely  assumed the role of epenthetic root in the construction "<small>ROOT</small><sub>1</sub> <small>ROOT</small><sub>2</sub>". Primordial ''[ˈn̠ʕih ˈə]'' "old" would therefore yield ''*knaiás'' "old" (=*knaí *ás) [PIE ''*sénos'' "old"]. Furthermore, this development culminated into the Indo-European Ablaut. That is: when the accent falls into the epenthetic root, the first root suffers a phonetic change influenced by the interaction between laryngeals and vowels


  the adjective construction of Pangaean [ROOT1 ROOT2
  the adjective construction of Pangaean [ROOT1 ROOT2
1,043

edits

Navigation menu