4,300
edits
Ancient Yeldha: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Tense & mood
Jukethatbox (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jukethatbox (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Present | ! Present | ||
| | | - || ''-ei(gh)-'' || ''-á(gh)-'' || rowspan=3 | ''-ú-'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Past | ! Past | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| ''-io(gh)-'' || ''-er-'' || ''-au(bh)-'' | | ''-io(gh)-'' || ''-er-'' || ''-au(bh)-'' | ||
|} | |} | ||
The inclusion of the flex consonants ⟨gh, bh⟩ is irregular and often depends on the verb. For example, the verb ''n- | The inclusion of the flex consonants ⟨gh, bh⟩ is irregular and often depends on the verb. For example, the verb ''n-thioch'' "to pour" is inflected without flexes, so ''theich'', ''thách'', ''thoch'', etc. However, the verb ''n-sciodh'' "to speak", is inflected '''with''' flexes, with apostrophes separating them from coda consonants, as in ''sceigh'dh'', ''scágh'dh'', ''scobh'dh'', etc. There is some phonological differentiation between flexed and non-flexed inflections according to the ''Caeghdiúll''; to take the previous example, ''thoch'' may have been pronounced [[Help:IPA|/θux/]] while ''sc'''obh''''dh'', of the same tense, may have been pronounced [[Help:IPA|/skuwð/]]. | ||
=====Aspect===== | =====Aspect===== | ||
{| class=wikitable style="text-align: center;" | {| class=wikitable style="text-align: center;" | ||