2,711
edits
Aryan: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Case
(→Case) |
|||
| Line 2,782: | Line 2,782: | ||
The Indo-european accusative ''*-m'' ... as an earlier allative<ref name=Pooth>Pooth et alii (2018); [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324360155%20The%20Origin%20of%20Non-Canonical%20Case%20Marking%20of%20Subjects%20in%20Proto-Indo-European%20Accusative%20Ergative%20or%20Semantic%20Alignment The Origin of Non-Canonical Case Marking of Subjects in Proto-Indo-European: Accusative, Ergative, or Semantic Alignment]</ref> | The Indo-european accusative ''*-m'' ... as an earlier allative<ref name=Pooth>Pooth et alii (2018); [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324360155%20The%20Origin%20of%20Non-Canonical%20Case%20Marking%20of%20Subjects%20in%20Proto-Indo-European%20Accusative%20Ergative%20or%20Semantic%20Alignment The Origin of Non-Canonical Case Marking of Subjects in Proto-Indo-European: Accusative, Ergative, or Semantic Alignment]</ref> | ||
While ''*h1i-m'' 3.SG-ACC (PIE) ⇒ ''μίν'' 3.SG.MASC.ACC (Greek), ''*h1i-s'' 3.SG-NOM (PIE) ⇒ ''is'' 3.SG.MASC.NOM (Latin) ... <ref name=Wackernagel>Wackernagel, Jacob; X</ref> | |||
===Noun=== | ===Noun=== | ||