902
edits
User:Nicolasstraccia/Minhastid: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
User:Nicolasstraccia/Minhastid (view source)
Revision as of 17:17, 11 February 2016
, 11 February 2016→Dialectology
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Minhast is divided into two major dialects. Upper Minhast and Lower Minhast. The two dialects groups differ chiefly in phonetics and the lexicon (for instance, Lower Minhast contains loanwords from neighbouring languages -e.g. Golahat- which Upper Minhast doesn't). Otherwise, the two dialects are mutually intelligible. | Minhast is divided into two major dialects. Upper Minhast and Lower Minhast. The two dialects groups differ chiefly in phonetics and the lexicon (for instance, Lower Minhast contains loanwords from neighbouring languages -e.g. Golahat- which Upper Minhast doesn't). Otherwise, the two dialects are mutually intelligible. | ||
The Crane Speaker Dialect is traditionally considered, due to its historical split from the mainland dialects, a part of the Upper Minhast group, but modern study of the differences which characterize the CSD seem to indicate that the linguistic split might have happened a longer time before the speakers left Minhay | The Crane Speaker Dialect is traditionally considered, due to its historical split from the mainland dialects, a part of the Upper Minhast group, but modern study of the differences which characterize the CSD seem to indicate that the linguistic split might have happened a longer time before the speakers left Minhay, which happened around 1900. This earlier split would place CSD in a more basal level within the Minhast tree. Two of those contending classifications situate the CSD as follows: | ||
{{clade | {{clade | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
<sup>2</sup> after ''Harrison, Yoshida & Dallas'', (1996). | <sup>2</sup> after ''Harrison, Yoshida & Dallas'', (1996). | ||
<!-- This new work in Minhast historical linguistic bred the term ''"Minhastic Languages"'' as a revision of the original ''Kilmarian Hypothesis'' by Hisakawa (Hisakawa et.al., 1957) which | <!-- This new work in Minhast historical linguistic and the internal splits into the different dialect groups bred the term ''"Minhastic Languages"'' as a way to address the difference between some polar opposites in the already stablished dialect continua and between them and other dialects which had drifted apart from the rest, the paramount case of the latter being the CSD itself. | ||
This lead to a revision of the original ''Kilmarian Hypothesis'' by Hisakawa (Hisakawa et.al., 1957) which upheld the belief that, when considered on their own, the Regional Historical Dialects of mainland Minhay constituted a small language family, with Minhast proper being but a central branch to it.--> | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
A.Kilmay-Ri | A.Kilmay-Ri | ||