User talk:EmperorZelos: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 158: Line 158:


Yes, indeed... Thanks! It's confusing how in Finnish we talk about having four tenses: present, imperfect (apparently also called preterite), perfect and pluperfect. On the other hand, aspects in Finnish are rare. So I'll change the 'imperfective' into 'simple past', right? Did you happen to notice any other mistakes (since I bet there are)?
Yes, indeed... Thanks! It's confusing how in Finnish we talk about having four tenses: present, imperfect (apparently also called preterite), perfect and pluperfect. On the other hand, aspects in Finnish are rare. So I'll change the 'imperfective' into 'simple past', right? Did you happen to notice any other mistakes (since I bet there are)?
[[User talk:Juhhmi]]
1,439

edits

Navigation menu