Kandi/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Linguifex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
 
(47 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==What it says on the tin==
{{Ambox
A collection of glossed interlinears in the [[Tsan]] language.
| name  = construction
| subst = <includeonly>{{subst:substcheck}}</includeonly>
| small = {{{small|no}}}
| type  = notice
| image = [[File:rissphere.png|65px]]
| sect  = {{{1|}}}
| issue = got infected with a nasty case of ''topic-comment'' grammar, and needs to be treated accordingly.
| talk  = {{{talk|}}}
| date  = {{{date|}}}
}}
{{Infobox language
|image =
|imagesize = 100px
|name = Kandi
|altname = Tsan
|nativename = Kándi tsúyi
|pronunciation = kaːndɪ t͡suβ̞ʝɪ
|creator = User:Waahlis
|setting = Unknown conworld
<!-- |region = West Africa
|states = Sierra Leone, Burkina Faso -->
|speakers = 4 million
|date = 2015
|familycolor = Afro-Asiatic
|fam1 = Jasi-Jivan
|fam2 = Tanisi
|ancestor = Proto-Kandi
|clcr = qts
|script1        = Latn
|agency        = ''Aytšin Tatšūkkāndi''
|notice = IPA
}}
'''Kāndi''', or '''Tsan''' (''kándi tsúyi'' or ''tsani tsúyi'') is a language spoken by the Tsan people. It belongs to the Tanisi language family and is thus distantly related to the [[Ris]] language. Kandi is a heavily [[w:agglutinative language|agglutinating]] with a complex verbal morphology. The language has repeatedly been analysed as lacking [[w:nouns|nouns]] and [[w:adjectives|adjectives]] altogether, in favour of [[w:verb|verb]]s.
 
<!-- ==Etymology==
The word ''tsan'' is the Kandi word for "''hand''" and is most often used to denote the speakers of the language, the Tsan people. As with most words in Kandi, the word has an adjectival meaning as well, and is usually translated as "''to be crafty''". -->
==Phonology==
===Consonants===
The Kandi inventory of consonants is very symmetrical. In D'Ivoires first model, he was mistaken and realised the velar approximant /ɰ/ as a variation of the long vowels. Comparative studies of the Ris and Jávva languages proved this to be wrong.
{| class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 700px; text-align: center;"
|+'''d'Ivoire model'''
|-
! colspan="2" rowspan="2"|
! colspan="1" rowspan="2"|Bilabial
!Dental
! colspan="3"|Alveolar
! rowspan="2"|Dorsal
 
! rowspan="2"|Glottal
|-
!<small>central</small>
!<small>central</small>
!<small>lateral</small>
!<small>palatal</small>
|-
! rowspan="1" colspan="2" |Nasals
|'''m''' /m/
| colspan="2" rowspan="1"|'''n''' /n/
|
|
|
|
|- align="center"
! rowspan="3"|Stops
|-
!<small>voiceless</small>
|
| colspan="2"|'''t''' /t/
|
|
|'''k''' /k/
|
|-
!<small>voiced</small>
| '''b''' /b/
| colspan="2"| '''d''' /d/
|
|
| '''g''' /g/
|
|-
! rowspan="1" colspan="2"|Affricates
|
|
|'''ts''' /t͡s/
|'''tl '''/t͡ɬ/
|'''tš '''/t͡ɕ/
|
|
|-
! colspan="2"|Fricatives
|
|
|'''s''' /s/
|
|'''š '''/ɕ/ · '''y''' /ʝ/
|'''x''' /x/
| '''h''' /h/
|-
! colspan="2" style="background: ;"|Approximants
|'''w''' /β̞/
|
|
|'''l''' /l/
|
|'''ǧ''' /ɰ/
|
|-
! colspan="2" style="background: ;"|Trills
|
|colspan="5"|'''r''' /ʀ~r/
|
|}


===Predicative complements===
===Vowels===
====Simple predicative expressions====
D'Ivoire standardised the phonemic inventory of vowels in the language, as per his conclusion that there were four phonemic short vowels, /i/, /a/, /u/, /ɔ/ and three phonemic "long" vowels. The quality of the long vowels is however rarely realised as the same as their short counterparts. It is likely that they once only differed in length, but such is no longer the case.
In Tsan, the predicative complement of an expression is equivalent to the predicate itself. All content words are predicates in their own right, due to a stative suffix, which has parallels in the English copula. The stative is a null suffix in the third person proximate homus, and the person and number congruate with the subject, whilst the gender congruates with the topic. The subject can also be marked independently.


{{Scriptgloss/indexable
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightbluebg" style="width: 550px; text-align:center;"
|script = ᎧᏊ
|+ '''d'Ivoire model'''
|-
|-
!style="width: 45px; "|
!style="width: 45px; "|<small>short</small>
!style="width: 45px; "|<small>long</small>
|-
! style="" |Close front unrounded
| '''i''' /i/
| '''í''' /iː/ [iː]
|-
! style="" |Open back unrounded
| '''a''' /a/
| '''á''' /aː/ [æ]
|-
! style="" |Open-mid back rounded
| '''o''' /ɔ/
| '''ó''' /ɔː/
|-
! style="" |Close back rounded
|'''u''' /u/
|'''ú''' /uː/ [u͜β̞]
|-
|}
 
 
===Morphophonology===
 
==Noun class specifers==
There are 9 noun classes in Kandi. They are distinguished by the specifier they use, which is one of few grammatical number dependent elements in the language.
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" class="bluetable lightblubg mw-collapsible mw-collapsible" style="width: 750px; text-align:center;"
|-
! Class
! colspan="2"| Singular
! colspan="2"| Dual
! colspan="2"| Plural
!
|-
!I
|''-ma''
|''-im''
|''-nna''
|''-únna''
|''-yme''
|''-imme''
| people, professions
|-
!II
|''-n''
|''-i''
|
|
|
|
| animals, pets, cattle
|-
!III
|''-uš''
|''-waš''
|
|
|
|
| predators, pejoratives
|-
!IV
|''wa-''
|''w-''
|
|
|
|
| plants, nature
|-
! V
|''ki-''
|''kin-''
|''-únna''
|''-yunna''
|
|
| meat, edibles, bodyparts
|-
! VI
|''-š''
|''-iš''
|''-sse''
|''-issa''
|
|
| small/round/short/curved objects
|-
!VII
|''-teh''
|''-teh''
|''-yittah''
|''-īttah''
|
|
| long/straight objects, instruments
|-
! VIII
|''-kka''
|''-ákka''
|
|
|
|
| unclear, abstractions
|-
! IX
|''-ye''
|''-ya''
|
|
|''-yeh''
|''-yeh''
| vast objects, divinity, honorifics
|}
 
== Simple stuff ==
==Predicative expressions==
The Kāndi language lacks a clear distinction between nouns and verbs, and exhibits a flexibility between the predicate and argument in a clause. Any Kāndi content word is equivalent to a predicative expression, by default {{sc|to be + noun}}. That means that a word like '''''šay''''' would mean ''(it is a) girl''.
 
{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = katsa
|phrase = katsa
|IPA = [ˈkat͡sa]
|IPA = [ˈkat͡sa]
| morphemes = katsa-∅
|morphemes = katsa-∅
| gloss = songbird.N-STAT.3SG.PROX.HO
|gloss = songbird({{sc|II}})-{{sc|PRED}}
| translation = It is a songbird.
|translation = It is a songbird.
| index = 1
|index = 1
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
}}{{gloss/indexable
|script = ᎧᏊᏪ:
|phrase = agúrri
|phrase = katsawí
|IPA = [agu͜βrɪ]
|IPA = [ˈkat͡sajiɨ̯]
| morphemes = agúrri-∅
| morphemes = katsa-w-í
| gloss = boy({{sc|II}})-{{sc|PRED}}
| gloss = songbird.N-1-STAT.HE
| translation = It is a boy.
| translation = I am a songbird.
| index = 2
| index = 2
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
}}
|script = ᎧᏊᎲ:Ꮁ
 
|phrase = katsakín
In a similar fashion there is '''''wí''''', '''''yín''''' ({{sc|PL}}), '''''sir'''''; content words for ''me'', ''you'', ''this'', et c., equivalent to English pronouns. In order to create a predicative expression of the type {{sc|I am + noun/adj}}, these are fixed to the end of the word. In most circumstances these ''pronominal predicatives'' are clitical.
|IPA = [ˈkat͡sakẽː]
{{gloss/indexable
| morphemes = katsa-kí-n
|phrase = wí
| gloss = songbird.N-2-STAT.HE-PL
|IPA = [wɪː]
| morphemes = wí-∅
| gloss = {{sc|1SG}}(I)-{{sc|PRED}}
| translation = It is I (It is me)
| index = 3
}}{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = agúrriwí
|IPA = [agu͜βrɪwɪː]
| morphemes = katsa-∅=wí
| gloss = boy({{sc|I}})-{{sc|PRED}}={{sc|1SG}}
| translation = I am a boy.
| index = 4
}}{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = katsayín
|IPA = [ˈkat͡sajɪːn]
| morphemes = katsa-∅=yín
| gloss = songbird({{sc|II}})-{{sc|PRED}}={{sc|2PL}}
| translation = You are songbirds.
| translation = You are songbirds.
| index = 3
| index = 5
}}
}}


====Predicative nominatives====
This is all fine and dandy, but you may ask yourself, what about predicative expressions with adjectives? How do I describe things? Kandi does not only lack a verb and noun distinction, it does not have adjectives in their own right either. Rather, some content words are more like adjectives than others, confer '''''kirim''''', ''something red'':
If the subject of the expression is stated independently, it is marked with a specifier, (SPEC), which roughly translates as the English relative determiner ''that which'', or the construction ''it is […] that is […]''. The post-vocalic form is ''–n'' and the post-consonantal form is ''–i''.  
{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = kirim
|IPA = [kɪˈɾɪm]
| morphemes = kirim-∅
| gloss = red({{sc|IX}})-{{sc|PRED}}
| translation = It is something red (It is red)
| index = 6
}}{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = kirimmí
|IPA = [kɪˈɾɪbmɪː]
| morphemes = kirim-∅=wí
| gloss = red({{sc|IX}})-{{sc|PRED}}={{sc|1SG}}
| translation = I am something red (I am red)
| index = 6
}}
===Specifier===
Predicative expressions over more complicated subjects than pronouns and the default are created by means of the ''specifier'' ({{sc|spec}}). Similarly to [[w:Salishan languages|Salishan languages]], the specifier determines the subject of a clause, amongst other things. The specifier is dependent upon the noun class of the subject, however:
{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = tšanun wušunna
|IPA = [ˈt͡ʃanun wʊˈʃʊdna]
| morphemes = tšanu-∅-n wušunna-∅
| gloss = horse({{sc|II}})-{{sc|PRED}}-{{sc|SPEC}} sad({{sc|IX}})-{{sc|PRED}}
| translation = The horse is sad
| index = 7
}}{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = walílak kirim
|IPA = [waˈlɪːlak kɪˈɾɪm]
| morphemes = wa-lílak-∅ kirim-∅
| gloss = {{sc|SPEC.SG.IV}}-flower({{sc|IV}})-{{sc|PRED}} red({{sc|IX}})-{{sc|PRED}}
| translation = The flower is red
| index = 8
}}{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = okúnna amik
|IPA = [okˈʊːdna aˈmɪk]
| morphemes = ok-∅-únna amik-∅
| gloss = eye({{sc|V}})-{{sc|PRED}}-{{sc|SPEC.DU.V}} pebble({{sc|VI}})-{{sc|PRED}}
| translation = The eyes are pebbles
| index = 9
}}
The specifier is difficult to understand, but confer the Salish languages of North America. The specifier is approximated relatively well by the expression {{sc|that which}}, which means that '''''tšanun wušunna''''' could be interpreted as ''That which is a horse, it is sad''.


===Compound predicative expressions===
In a similar manner to the enclitical pronomials previously, the predicate may be incorporated into the subject of the clause, and produce a compound of sorts. The compounds are normally accompanied with a suffix '''''-y-''''' for phonological reasons:
{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = okkamik
|IPA = [okˈkamɪk]
| morphemes = ok-y-amik-∅
| gloss = eye({{sc|V}})-{{sc|COMP}} pebble({{sc|VI}})-{{sc|PRED}}
| translation = The eyes are pebble/The eye is a pebble
| index = 10
}}{{gloss/indexable
|phrase = šayyú
|IPA = [ˈʃajːʊ͜β]
| morphemes = šay-y-yú-∅
| gloss = girl({{sc|V}})-{{sc|COMP}}-pretty({{sc|VIII}})-{{sc|PRED}}
| translation = The girl is pretty
| index = 11
}}
These compounds are no longer very common, and they are sometimes used attributively, confer ''the pretty girl'', instead of ''the girl is pretty''. Most of them have become fixed phrases, '''''šayyú''''' is a common way to call for a girl, for example. The word '''''okkamik''''' on the other hand is used for especially unempathetic people. Other examples include '''''omókkánay''''', ''God is great'', and '''''wánawakáyuma''''', ''the sky is endless''.
== Intransitive clauses ==
:''See also: [[Kandi/Sandbox#Predicative_expressions|Kandi/Predicative expressions]]''


The predicative complement, or predicate, agrees with the topic. The topic, most often the subject, is marked with the third person singular homus suffix, as well as the specifier.
Intransitive clauses in Kandi are formed in a very similar manner to predicative expressions. In fact, there is no difference at all. Which... Can be tricky. In essence, there is no grammatical difference between ''I am biking'' and ''I am a bike''.
 
{{gloss/indexable
{{Scriptgloss/indexable
|phrase = síkawí
|script = ᎭᎱ ᎧᏊᏪ:
|IPA = [ˈsɪːkawɪː]
|phrase = wan katsawí
| morphemes = síka-∅=wí
|IPA = [ɰʌ̃ʔ ˈkat͡sajiɨ̯]
| gloss = bike({{sc|VI}})-{{sc|PRED}}={{sc|1SG}}
| morphemes = wa-∅-n katsa-w-í
| translation = I am a bike/I am biking
| gloss = 1SG.M-3.HO-SPEC songbird.N-1-STAT.HE
| index = 12
| translation = I am a songbird.
}}{{gloss/indexable
| index = 2.5
|phrase = tíndatšiwí
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
|IPA = [ˈtɪːndat͡ʃɪwɪː]
|script = Ꮡ:Ꮾ ᏡᎪᏕ:
| morphemes = tínda-∅-tši=wí
|phrase = yúni tsháatlí
| gloss = know({{sc|IX}})-{{sc|PRED}}-{{sc|DUB}}={{sc|1SG}}
|IPA = [ˈʝʊ̃β̞i ˈt͡ɕaːt͡ɬiɨ̯]
| translation = I am not sure I know
| morphemes = yún-∅-i tsháatli-í
| index = 13
| gloss = John.M-3.HO-SPEC nice.N-3.HE
}}{{gloss/indexable
| translation = John is nice.
|phrase = yúr kánnami
| index = 2.6
|IPA = [ˈjʊ͜βɾ ˈkaːdnamɪ]
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
| morphemes = yúr-∅ kán-∅-yam-i
|script = Ꮡ:Ꮾ ᎪᏌᎪ
| gloss = goat({{sc|II}})-{{sc|PRED}} sight(V)-{{sc|PRED}}-{{sc|INF}}-{{sc|II.SPEC}}
|phrase = yúni anda
| translation = The goat must have seen (been able to see)
|IPA = [ˈʝʊ̃β̞i ˈʌ̃tʼa]
| index = 14
| morphemes = yún-∅-i anda-∅
| gloss = John.M-3.HO-SPEC man.M-3.HO
| translation = John is a man.
| index = 2.7
}}
}}


====Predicative accusatives====
Do note that the specifier is afficed to the predicate-like part of the clause, in the last case '''''kánnam-i'''''. An apt translation would thus be ''That which is know(-ing), is a goat''. Remember that definiteness and tense are not distinguished in the language.
Tsan has one copula, and one copula only.  In English you may find a variety of related verbs with similar function to the main copula ''to be''; for example ''to feel'', ''to seem'' and ''to become''. In Tsan, the semantics of these verbs are all conveyed by means of modifying the copula with evidentials, mood markers, applicatives and other constructions.  


Typically, what may be percieved as an increase in valency is marked with the copula and an appropriate applicative-like affix. The former subject is always demoted to the object or patient.
== Transitive clauses ==
 
Transitive clauses are formed in a few different ways. This is the most common construction,
{{Scriptgloss/indexable
{{gloss/indexable
|script = Ꮡ:Ꮾ Ꮝ:ᎪᎭᏌ:
|phrase = yúr kingússa kánnami
|phrase = yóni sáayandá
|IPA = [ˈjʊ͜βɾ ˈkɪŋgʊ͜βsːa ˈkɔdnamɪ]
|IPA = [ˈʝɒ̃ʔi saːˈʝʌ̃tʼaː]
| morphemes = yúr-∅ kin-gússa-∅ kán-∅-yam-i
| morphemes = yón-∅-i sáay-anda-∅
| gloss = goat({{sc|II}})-{{sc|PRED}} {{sc|V.SPEC}}-arse({{sc|V}})-{{sc|PRED}} sight(V)-{{sc|PRED}}-{{sc|INF}}-{{sc|II.SPEC}}
| gloss = 1SG.M-3SG.PROX.HO-SPEC 3PL.REP-man.N-3SG.PROX.HO
| translation = The goat must have seen the arse
| translation = They call John a man.
| index = 15
| index = 2.8
}}
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
{{gloss/indexable
|script =
|phrase = Kšammí štaptih!
|phrase = yóni wandátsu
|IPA = [ˈkɕabmɪː ˈɕtap͡ftɪ]
|IPA = [ˈʝɒ̃ʔi β̞atʼaːt͡su]
| morphemes = kšan-∅=wí štap-∅-tih
| morphemes = yón-∅-i <wúu>-anda-∅<tsu>
| gloss = writing({{sc|IX}})-{{sc|PRED}}={{sc|1SG}} book({{sc|VII}})-{{sc|PRED}}-{{sc|VII.SPEC}}
| gloss = 1SG.M-3SG.PROX.HO-SPEC <1SG.CAUS>-man.N-3SG.PROX.HO-<1SG.CAUS>
| translation = I'm writing a book!
| translation = I made John a man.
| index = 16
| index = 2.9
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
|script =
|phrase = sáayayómbá
|IPA = /saːʝaˈʝɒ̃pʼaː/
| morphemes = sáaya-yón-wá
| gloss = 3PL.REP-man.N-1SG.HO
| translation = They call me a man.
| index = 2.10
}}
}}
===Intransitive clauses===
which uses a specifier marking on the verb and on the object of the verb. Less idiomatic translations would be ''That which sees that which is the arse, it is a goat'' and ''I write that which is a book!'', respectively.
When you accept that two content words in a predicative expression co-function as predicate and subject, it is not difficult to imagine other clauses with one core argument. The simplest are the corresponding English intransitive clauses. Tsan makes an important dichotomy between stative and dynamic content words.
{{gloss/indexable
 
|phrase = Išawíy!
====Stative clauses====
|IPA = [ˈɪʃawɪːʝ]
Stative predicates, such as ''to hang'', ''to lie'', ''to be on fire'', ''to taste like'' and ''to know'' are almost exclusively expressed by means of the copula suffix. See also [[Tsan#Predicative complements|predicative complements]], which is an equivalent interpretation.
| morphemes = iša-∅=wí=y
{{Scriptgloss/indexable
| gloss = hate({{sc|IX}})-{{sc|PRED}}={{sc|1SG}}={{sc|2SG}}
|script =
| translation = I hate you!
|phrase = tátshuyi kákawiká
| index = 17
|IPA = [ˈta:t͡ɕʊʝi ka:ˈk͡xajika:]
}}{{gloss/indexable
| morphemes = tátshuy-∅-i kákawi-ká
|phrase = winnaš wahšúwí!
| gloss = guard.N-3SG.PROX.HO-SPEC fire.N-3SG.OBV.HO
|IPA = [wahˈwɪdnaʃ wahˈʃʊ͜βɪː]
| translation = The guard is burning [up].
| morphemes = winnaš-∅ wah-šú-∅=wí
| index = 3.11
| gloss = moose({{sc|II}})-{{sc|PRED}} {{sc|SURP}}-eat({{sc|III}})-{{sc|PRED}}={{sc|1SG}}
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
| translation = Gah, the moose is eating me!
|script =
| index = 18
|phrase = téndatshiwí...
|IPA = [tə̃ːtʼaˈt͡ɕijiː]
| morphemes = ténda-tshi-wí
| gloss = knowing.N-DUB-1SG.HE
| translation = I am not sure I know.
| index = 3.12
}}
}}


====Dynamic clauses====
== Possession ==
Dynamic predicatives on the other hand, including '' to run'', ''to lay'', ''to put on fire'', ''to savour'', and ''to learn'', are formed with a conjugating dynamic prefix, acting in the same manner as the copula.
There are two main methods of expression possession in the language, utilising either the locative {{sc|LOC}} or the possessive {{sc|POSS}} affixes. The possessive suffix is by far the most common one, but the locative is more prevalent in certain dialects and in more formal registers. The usage is similar to Irish or Finnish, where for example the phrase ''The book at him'' most often translates as ''His book''. It is important to note that the locative possession is restricted to animacy; only possessions of people can take the locative, making the phrase ''The house at the dog'' purely positional. It also calls into question your suitability as a pet owner.
{{Scriptgloss/indexable
|script =
|phrase = tátshuyi yáakákawi
|IPA = [ˈta:t͡ɕʊʝi ʝa:ˈka:k͡xaji]
| morphemes = tátshuy-∅-i yáa-kákawi
| gloss = guard.N-3SG.PROX.HO-SPEC DYN.3SG.OBV.HO-fire.N
| translation = The guard is burning [something].
| index = 3.13
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
|script =
|phrase = wáaténdatshi...
|IPA = [ɰa:tə̃ːtʼaˈt͡ɕi]
| morphemes = wáa-ténda-tshi
| gloss = DYN.1SG.HE-knowing.N-DUB
| translation = I am not sure I learn [anything].
| index = 3.14
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
|script =
|phrase = yáanti katsan
|IPA = [ʝaːˈʔani ˈkat͡sʌ̃]
| morphemes = yáa-anti katsa-∅-n
| gloss = DYN.3SG.OBV.HO-walking.N songbird.N-3SG.PROX.HO-SPEC
| translation = The songbird walks.
| index = 3.15
}}


====Flexibility of arguments and predicates====
{{gloss/indexable
It is in these dynamic and static clauses that Tsan first exhibits its flexibility of arguments. By simply switching the prefixes of the content words, the meaning is reversed or changed drastically.
|phrase = síkawíniš
{{Scriptgloss/indexable
|IPA = [ˈsɪːkwɪːnɪʃ]
|script =
| morphemes = síka=wí-n-iš
|phrase = tátshuyá kákawin
| gloss = bike({{sc|VI}})=me({{sc|I}})-{{sc|POSS}}-{{sc|SPEC}}
|IPA = [ˈta:t͡ɕʊʝa: ˈka:k͡xajẽ]
| translation = my bike
| morphemes = tátshuy-∅ kákawi-n
| index = 18
| gloss = guard.N-3SG.OBV.HO fire.N-3SG.PROX.HO-SPEC
}}{{gloss/indexable
| translation = The fire is a guard.
|phrase = kiy wanikánikka?
| index = 3.16
|IPA = [ˈkɪj ˈwanɪkaːnɪkːa]
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
| morphemes = kiy wani=ká-n-ikka
|script =
| gloss = what name({{sc|VIII}})=you({{sc|I}})-{{sc|POSS}}-{{sc|SPEC}}
|phrase = yáatátshuy kákawin
| translation = what is your name?
|IPA = [ʝa:ˈta:t͡ɕʊʝ ˈka:k͡xajẽ]
| index = 18
| morphemes = yáa-tátshuy kákawi-n
}}{{gloss/indexable
| gloss = DYN.3SG.OBV.HO-guard.N fire.N-3SG.PROX.HO-SPEC
|phrase = wušunnay ixán
| translation = The fire is a guard.
|IPA = [ˈwʊʃʊdnaj ˈɪxaːn]
| index = 3.17
| morphemes = wušunna-y ixá-n
}}{{Scriptgloss/indexable
| gloss = despair({{sc|IX}})-({{sc|IX.SPEC}}) child({{sc|I}})-{{sc|POSS}}
|script =
| translation = the despair of a child
|phrase = yáakatsa antin
| index = 19
|IPA = [ʝaːˈk͡xat͡sa ˈʔanẽ ]
}}{{gloss/indexable
| morphemes = yáah-katsa anti-∅-n
|phrase = kamúnne wíyun
| gloss = DYN.3SG.OBV.HO-songbird.N walking.N-3SG.PROX.HO-SPEC
|IPA = [ˈkamʊːdnɛ ˈwɪːjʊn]
| translation = *The walk songbirds.
| morphemes = kamún-ye wí-yun
| index = 3.18
| gloss = house({{sc|IX}})-({{sc|IX.SPEC}}) me({{sc|I}})-{{sc|LOC}}
| translation = my house/the house at me
| index = 20
}}
}}


Latest revision as of 19:06, 5 July 2021

Kandi
Tsan
Kándi tsúyi
Pronunciation[kaːndɪ t͡suβ̞ʝɪ]
Created byWaahlis
SettingUnknown conworld
Native speakers4 million (2015)
Jasi-Jivan
  • Tanisi
    • Kandi
Early form
Proto-Kandi
Official status
Regulated byAytšin Tatšūkkāndi
Language codes
CLCRqts
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

Kāndi, or Tsan (kándi tsúyi or tsani tsúyi) is a language spoken by the Tsan people. It belongs to the Tanisi language family and is thus distantly related to the Ris language. Kandi is a heavily agglutinating with a complex verbal morphology. The language has repeatedly been analysed as lacking nouns and adjectives altogether, in favour of verbs.

Phonology

Consonants

The Kandi inventory of consonants is very symmetrical. In D'Ivoires first model, he was mistaken and realised the velar approximant /ɰ/ as a variation of the long vowels. Comparative studies of the Ris and Jávva languages proved this to be wrong.

d'Ivoire model
Bilabial Dental Alveolar Dorsal Glottal
central central lateral palatal
Nasals m /m/ n /n/
Stops
voiceless t /t/ k /k/
voiced b /b/ d /d/ g /g/
Affricates ts /t͡s/ tl /t͡ɬ/ tš /t͡ɕ/
Fricatives s /s/ š /ɕ/ · y /ʝ/ x /x/ h /h/
Approximants w /β̞/ l /l/ ǧ /ɰ/
Trills r /ʀ~r/

Vowels

D'Ivoire standardised the phonemic inventory of vowels in the language, as per his conclusion that there were four phonemic short vowels, /i/, /a/, /u/, /ɔ/ and three phonemic "long" vowels. The quality of the long vowels is however rarely realised as the same as their short counterparts. It is likely that they once only differed in length, but such is no longer the case.

d'Ivoire model
short long
Close front unrounded i /i/ í /iː/ [iː]
Open back unrounded a /a/ á /aː/ [æ]
Open-mid back rounded o /ɔ/ ó /ɔː/
Close back rounded u /u/ ú /uː/ [u͜β̞]


Morphophonology

Noun class specifers

There are 9 noun classes in Kandi. They are distinguished by the specifier they use, which is one of few grammatical number dependent elements in the language.

Class Singular Dual Plural
I -ma -im -nna -únna -yme -imme people, professions
II -n -i animals, pets, cattle
III -uš -waš predators, pejoratives
IV wa- w- plants, nature
V ki- kin- -únna -yunna meat, edibles, bodyparts
VI -š -iš -sse -issa small/round/short/curved objects
VII -teh -teh -yittah -īttah long/straight objects, instruments
VIII -kka -ákka unclear, abstractions
IX -ye -ya -yeh -yeh vast objects, divinity, honorifics

Simple stuff

Predicative expressions

The Kāndi language lacks a clear distinction between nouns and verbs, and exhibits a flexibility between the predicate and argument in a clause. Any Kāndi content word is equivalent to a predicative expression, by default to be + noun. That means that a word like šay would mean (it is a) girl.


katsa
[ˈkat͡sa]
katsa-∅
songbird(II)-PRED
It is a songbird.

(1)

agúrri
[agu͜βrɪ]
agúrri-∅
boy(II)-PRED
It is a boy.

(2)


In a similar fashion there is wí, yín (PL), sir; content words for me, you, this, et c., equivalent to English pronouns. In order to create a predicative expression of the type I am + noun/adj, these are fixed to the end of the word. In most circumstances these pronominal predicatives are clitical.

wí
[wɪː]
wí-∅
1SG(I)-PRED
It is I (It is me)

(3)

agúrriwí
[agu͜βrɪwɪː]
katsa-∅=wí
boy(I)-PRED=1SG
I am a boy.

(4)

katsayín
[ˈkat͡sajɪːn]
katsa-∅=yín
songbird(II)-PRED=2PL
You are songbirds.

(5)


This is all fine and dandy, but you may ask yourself, what about predicative expressions with adjectives? How do I describe things? Kandi does not only lack a verb and noun distinction, it does not have adjectives in their own right either. Rather, some content words are more like adjectives than others, confer kirim, something red:

kirim
[kɪˈɾɪm]
kirim-∅
red(IX)-PRED
It is something red (It is red)

(6)

kirimmí
[kɪˈɾɪbmɪː]
kirim-∅=wí
red(IX)-PRED=1SG
I am something red (I am red)

(6)

Specifier

Predicative expressions over more complicated subjects than pronouns and the default are created by means of the specifier (spec). Similarly to Salishan languages, the specifier determines the subject of a clause, amongst other things. The specifier is dependent upon the noun class of the subject, however:

tšanun wušunna
[ˈt͡ʃanun wʊˈʃʊdna]
tšanu-∅-n wušunna-∅
horse(II)-PRED-SPEC sad(IX)-PRED
The horse is sad

(7)

walílak kirim
[waˈlɪːlak kɪˈɾɪm]
wa-lílak-∅ kirim-∅
SPEC.SG.IV-flower(IV)-PRED red(IX)-PRED
The flower is red

(8)

okúnna amik
[okˈʊːdna aˈmɪk]
ok-∅-únna amik-∅
eye(V)-PRED-SPEC.DU.V pebble(VI)-PRED
The eyes are pebbles

(9)

The specifier is difficult to understand, but confer the Salish languages of North America. The specifier is approximated relatively well by the expression that which, which means that tšanun wušunna could be interpreted as That which is a horse, it is sad.

Compound predicative expressions

In a similar manner to the enclitical pronomials previously, the predicate may be incorporated into the subject of the clause, and produce a compound of sorts. The compounds are normally accompanied with a suffix -y- for phonological reasons:

okkamik
[okˈkamɪk]
ok-y-amik-∅
eye(V)-COMP pebble(VI)-PRED
The eyes are pebble/The eye is a pebble

(10)

šayyú
[ˈʃajːʊ͜β]
šay-y-yú-∅
girl(V)-COMP-pretty(VIII)-PRED
The girl is pretty

(11)

These compounds are no longer very common, and they are sometimes used attributively, confer the pretty girl, instead of the girl is pretty. Most of them have become fixed phrases, šayyú is a common way to call for a girl, for example. The word okkamik on the other hand is used for especially unempathetic people. Other examples include omókkánay, God is great, and wánawakáyuma, the sky is endless.

Intransitive clauses

See also: Kandi/Predicative expressions

Intransitive clauses in Kandi are formed in a very similar manner to predicative expressions. In fact, there is no difference at all. Which... Can be tricky. In essence, there is no grammatical difference between I am biking and I am a bike.

síkawí
[ˈsɪːkawɪː]
síka-∅=wí
bike(VI)-PRED=1SG
I am a bike/I am biking

(12)

tíndatšiwí
[ˈtɪːndat͡ʃɪwɪː]
tínda-∅-tši=wí
know(IX)-PRED-DUB=1SG
I am not sure I know

(13)

yúr kánnami
[ˈjʊ͜βɾ ˈkaːdnamɪ]
yúr-∅ kán-∅-yam-i
goat(II)-PRED sight(V)-PRED-INF-II.SPEC
The goat must have seen (been able to see)

(14)


Do note that the specifier is afficed to the predicate-like part of the clause, in the last case kánnam-i. An apt translation would thus be That which is know(-ing), is a goat. Remember that definiteness and tense are not distinguished in the language.

Transitive clauses

Transitive clauses are formed in a few different ways. This is the most common construction,

yúr kingússa kánnami
[ˈjʊ͜βɾ ˈkɪŋgʊ͜βsːa ˈkɔdnamɪ]
yúr-∅ kin-gússa-∅ kán-∅-yam-i
goat(II)-PRED V.SPEC-arse(V)-PRED sight(V)-PRED-INF-II.SPEC
The goat must have seen the arse

(15)


Kšammí štaptih!
[ˈkɕabmɪː ˈɕtap͡ftɪ]
kšan-∅=wí štap-∅-tih
writing(IX)-PRED=1SG book(VII)-PRED-VII.SPEC
I'm writing a book!

(16)

which uses a specifier marking on the verb and on the object of the verb. Less idiomatic translations would be That which sees that which is the arse, it is a goat and I write that which is a book!, respectively.

Išawíy!
[ˈɪʃawɪːʝ]
iša-∅=wí=y
hate(IX)-PRED=1SG=2SG
I hate you!

(17)

winnaš wahšúwí!
[wahˈwɪdnaʃ wahˈʃʊ͜βɪː]
winnaš-∅ wah-šú-∅=wí
moose(II)-PRED SURP-eat(III)-PRED=1SG
Gah, the moose is eating me!

(18)


Possession

There are two main methods of expression possession in the language, utilising either the locative LOC or the possessive POSS affixes. The possessive suffix is by far the most common one, but the locative is more prevalent in certain dialects and in more formal registers. The usage is similar to Irish or Finnish, where for example the phrase The book at him most often translates as His book. It is important to note that the locative possession is restricted to animacy; only possessions of people can take the locative, making the phrase The house at the dog purely positional. It also calls into question your suitability as a pet owner.


síkawíniš
[ˈsɪːkwɪːnɪʃ]
síka=wí-n-iš
bike(VI)=me(I)-POSS-SPEC
my bike

(18)

kiy wanikánikka?
[ˈkɪj ˈwanɪkaːnɪkːa]
kiy wani=ká-n-ikka
what name(VIII)=you(I)-POSS-SPEC
what is your name?

(18)

wušunnay ixán
[ˈwʊʃʊdnaj ˈɪxaːn]
wušunna-y ixá-n
despair(IX)-(IX.SPEC) child(I)-POSS
the despair of a child

(19)

kamúnne wíyun
[ˈkamʊːdnɛ ˈwɪːjʊn]
kamún-ye wí-yun
house(IX)-(IX.SPEC) me(I)-LOC
my house/the house at me

(20)


What's actually inside

  • ᎭᎪᏨ:ᏡᎲᏙᏙᏔᏋᎹ ᎪᏫᏢᎭᎹ:ᎰᎱ;
    yáasúweyikukúusima awushuyamátin?
    [ʝaːsuβ̞ɛʝikuˈkuːβ̞sẽʔa aβ̞uɕuʝʌ̃ˈʔaːtẽ]

    Is that moose crying herring?

(-)

Retrieved from "https://linguifex.com/w/index.php?title=Kandi/Sandbox&oldid=230229"