User:Chrysophylax/Creating an Indo-European Conlang: Difference between revisions
(→Creating a descendant of a modern language chapter: Started a slightly comedic section, incomplete) |
|||
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
==Creating a descendant of a modern language chapter== | ==Creating a descendant of a modern language chapter== | ||
My contribewshins [[User:Ceige|Ceige]] ([[User talk:Ceige|talk]]) 11:16, 3 February 2014 (CET) | <!--My contribewshins [[User:Ceige|Ceige]] ([[User talk:Ceige|talk]]) 11:16, 3 February 2014 (CET) --> | ||
===Step Vån: Becoming the Farseer=== | ===Step Vån: Becoming the Farseer=== | ||
''Or the prophet, depending on your belief system. Or | ''Or the prophet, depending on your belief system. Or a Jedi, depending on your fandom.'' | ||
Creating a descendant of a modern language almost always involves predicting the future to whatever degree. Sometimes, this is less pronounced, especially if your goal is to imagine English if Japan took over the United States of America, in which case, while you can still play the prophet, there's less of a need since you're knee-deep in fantasy as is. | Creating a descendant of a modern language almost always involves predicting the future to whatever degree. Sometimes, this is less pronounced, especially if your goal is to imagine English if Japan took over the United States of America, in which case, while you can still play the prophet, there's less of a need since you're knee-deep in fantasy as is. | ||
| Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
===Step Frey: Interpreting the Visions=== | ===Step Frey: Interpreting the Visions=== | ||
''"In 5 years time, I see you as a generous fisherman - oh, wait, I meant I see you getting eaten by a shark and having house looted, mah bad!"'' | ''"In 5 years time, I see you as a generous fisherman - oh, wait, I meant I see you getting eaten by a shark and having house looted, mah bad!"'' | ||
You want to know the context of your future language, both the things that you want to be in the context, and things that should naturally be part of the context. | |||
For example: Spanish in North America in the year 2200AD, during the reign of Immortal Overlord Obama<ref name="Obama">Bugger, this joke's only gonna last until 2017...</ref> | |||
==Chapter on sibling-makery, e.g., Harākti== | ==Chapter on sibling-makery, e.g., Harākti== | ||
[[Category:Guides]] | [[Category:Guides]] | ||
Revision as of 10:23, 3 February 2014
| ||||||||||||||
Foreword
The moniker “Indo-European languages” represent one of the most studied (if not the most) language families of the world; quite a few of history's great cultural hegemons have been part of this family, a fact which is most storngly noticed when one surveys the amount of research.
The family is also one of the largest language family in the world in terms of native speakers. Languages as different as English (365 million), Latin (few to none), Ancient Greek (few to none), Hindi-Urdu(361 million), Russian (162 million), Welsh (720,000), and Armenian (6 million) all belong to this gigantic, sprawling family.
All in all, Indo-European languages offer the conlanger ample material from which to draw upon when engaging in lighthearted linguogenesis, what with detailed grammars, lexica, recordings, dissertations, and so on. Whether it be Aarlaansk (a descendant of Latin in northwestern Europe), Harākti (a sibling of Hittite), Gutiskar (Germanic), Syrunian (a Levantine descendant of Latin), Thorian (a close relative of the Greek family), Quadian (an 'old Germanic' language) or belonging to a whole new branch entirely as Alkalic, Nṛtranya (a language drawn from a 'reconstructed PIE'-lexicon based on mostly Proto-Germanic words then taken down through Sanskrit-y sound changes) or Dhannuá (a melangemischung of Celtic, Italic, and Germanic elements), Indo-European-derived languages don't seem to be ceasing in popularity or creativity any time soon.
As the Indo-European family has an abundance of material written on it, while making the task easier for the conlanger when it comes to deriving new words, it also enforces a modicum of accountability; the Indo-European topic-focus conlang, while completely plausible, sure does have some explaining to do. Basically, it's a lot harder to just make things up out of thin air. On the other hand, you are presented with a wealth of already existing linguistic resources with which to play; a prefabricated sandbox of joy; a themed linguistic LEGO® set with hundreds of manuals and configurations available that resonate across continents.
It is useful to read some literature on the Indo-European family and its reconstructed last common ancestor Proto-Indo-European (commonly referred to as PIE). By reading about the proto-language one comes to a greater understanding of many irregularities in the modern descendants. E.g., English's “difficult” strong verbs: sing, sang, sung; spring, sprang, sprung; give, gave, given, or Latin's rare reduplicating verbs, e.g., disco, didici ; tango, tetigi. Not only are these processes all understandable when viewed from an Indo-European point of view; they also provide lots of ideas for the conlanger!
While ultimately not 'super' necessary for the conlanger who's creating a descendant of Modern English as spoken by a mix of Ameri-Russo-Japanese space explorers 200 years from now on the moon of Titan, it is quite useful to familiarise oneself with many of the concepts discussed in Indo-European linguistics when guiding conlangs through a linguistic conhistory.
- Recommended introductory reading
- Proto-Indo-European language at Wikipedia
- Donald Ringe's From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic (2006), ISBN 9780199284139
- Mallory, JP; Adams, DQ The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World (2006), ISBN 9780199296682
- Various books on Proto-Indo-European with "introduction" in their titles.
As you familiarise yourself more and more with the Indo-European languages, you start stumbling onto a few questions regarding your conlang — do I want my own branch? my own descendant of an already existing branch? a contact language between two branches? a descendant of a specific language? — these are all valid questions and options available to you when crafting it.
When creating a descendant, looking at how the language you're basing your conlang on developed compared to its siblings can be a helpful exercise in determining general trends and may even spark some ideas for your own language!
On the other hand, if you choose to innovate a whole new language based on PIE itself you have a the delightful task of deciding in which direction to take it. Again, reviewing languages you personally enjoy and their history can be quite a powerful tool when it comes to ideogenesis.
If you feel like joining la grande famille in terms of both nat- and conlangs, you've stumbled onto the right place,
— User:Chrysophylax, editor.
nota bene: this page is a living document and is prone to sudden changes at any time. If you wish to find a previous version, please use the history tab. When linking to people outside of the wiki, it is recommended that you link directly to the version you are seeing as the state of the document cannot be guaranteed for the future.
A whole new world: creating your own PIE-derived language
If you find that making romlangs, germlangs, slavlangs, sinolangs, celtlangs just a bit too constraining, the option of making up your own base on which to experiment further on is a safe bet for fun! The reasons for engaging in diachronic conlanging with PIE as point of origin are many and varied - just like the results. By building your own branch of the Indo-European tree you'll have lots of exciting moments dealing with concepts like common innovations, isoglosses, borrowings, conservatism-innovation, and so on.
This chapter assumes a basic understanding of concepts such as phoneme, allophone, ablaut, word order, and so on.
The processes of change and their effects
The primary driving force of linguistic change is […] […]these interact in many ways making […] In the next three parts we will discuss them separately […]
Forging a phonology
Proto-Indo-European is commonly accepted to have had the following vowel and consonant inventory with some minor disagreements on the phonemicity of *a
| Labial | Coronal | Dorsal | Laryngeal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| palatal | plain | labial | |||||
| Nasal | *m | *n | |||||
| Plosive | *p | *t | *ḱ | *k | *kʷ | ||
| voiced | (*b) | *d | *ǵ | *g | *gʷ | ||
| aspirated | *bʰ | *dʰ | *ǵʰ | *gʰ | *gʷʰ | ||
| Fricative | *s | *h₁, *h₂, *h₃ | |||||
| Liquid | *r, *l | ||||||
| Approximant | *y [j] | *w | |||||
| Front | Back | |
|---|---|---|
| Close | *i | *u |
| Mid | *e *ē | *o *ō |
| Open | a* ā* |
You have many options available in the treatment of the vowels and consonants; already in Proto-Indo-European we discern a trend towards either engaging in af/fricativisation or not of the 'palatovelars'. This important isogloss divides Indo-European into two broad swaths: Centum and Satem. Cf. with the reconstructed PIE *(d)ḱm̥tóm.
Melting morphology
Smithing smooth sentences syntactically
Loaning lexica - word borrowing between PIE dialects
Differentiation - ideas for creating siblings
Creating a descendant of a modern language chapter
Step Vån: Becoming the Farseer
Or the prophet, depending on your belief system. Or a Jedi, depending on your fandom.
Creating a descendant of a modern language almost always involves predicting the future to whatever degree. Sometimes, this is less pronounced, especially if your goal is to imagine English if Japan took over the United States of America, in which case, while you can still play the prophet, there's less of a need since you're knee-deep in fantasy as is.
Another factor is time. How far in the future is your descendent? Is it English spoken in 100 years in New Zealand (New Zullunish, presumably), or is it English spoken in the year 4320, after assimilating Chilean Spanish and Palestinian Arabic into it, on the planet El-Kzæm? The further ahead in the future, the more liberal your changes can be, but you'll still have to pay attention to what you're doing to make things neat - it's just a slightly different focus though, with more creative freedom, as you can now say, for example, that -në is the English genitive ending, and make up a long and twisted tale explaining this.
When your language is only 230 years different from its ancestor, though, it becomes harder to explain how English adopted the Russian -skaya adjective ending as a perfect verb marker.
Step Tøui: Peering into the Crystal Ball
... and which brand of protective goggles will give you the best run for your money.
Now that you're thinking like a fortune teller, a wizard, or an ethically-challenging supercomputer given more control of human life than is safe, it's time to thing about your focus.
- Younger languages generally require more thought about phonology, vocabulary and style, and then the results on grammar
- Older languages generally require a goal to work towards - e.g. make a change to the language, and then explain it and see if it fits
...however, that said, you can use either method for either language. There's no strict rules, they're purely recommmendations to help make things more efficient. For example, making an older language using the guide for younger languages could take you on a very long journey where you might lose your place. You might want that, actually. With younger languages, you might have a specific goal, and find it easier to explain changes away after you've made them - but this might get unrealistic fast (for example, South Australian English /fa:st/ isn't going to turn into /hi:çþ/ overnight without a very good explanation).
Step Frey: Interpreting the Visions
"In 5 years time, I see you as a generous fisherman - oh, wait, I meant I see you getting eaten by a shark and having house looted, mah bad!"
You want to know the context of your future language, both the things that you want to be in the context, and things that should naturally be part of the context.
For example: Spanish in North America in the year 2200AD, during the reign of Immortal Overlord Obama[1]
Chapter on sibling-makery, e.g., Harākti
- ^ Bugger, this joke's only gonna last until 2017...