4,735
edits
User:Chrysophylax/Proto-Lusanic: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
User:Chrysophylax/Proto-Lusanic (view source)
Revision as of 06:21, 21 October 2013
, 21 October 2013→Schleicher's PIE fable rendered into Proto-Lusanic
Chrysophylax (talk | contribs) |
Chrysophylax (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 243: | Line 243: | ||
:''Proto-Lusanic'' (Ivanin Aiduvitić<ref name="ivanin"></ref>) | :''Proto-Lusanic'' (Ivanin Aiduvitić<ref name="ivanin"></ref>) | ||
:: [Wérei] Owis, éwēswe, wési̯o wŭ́lnā ne íst, éwāns spéket, éwon wárun wúghon woghondan, éwonwe méghan bhóron, éwonwe ghámenan, ṓku bhérondan. Owis nu éwai̯bhos wū́wet: kḗr aghna moi̯ éwens agondan néran wídandei̯. Eweis tu wū́wont: lúdhi, owei, kḗr aghna ánsamei̯ wídandibhos: ánēr, pódis, áwi̯on rō wúlnān swébhi wárnūdi nu wéramon wéstron néghi áwi̯on wŭ́lnā íst. Tód lúwus owis nu agron bhúget. | :: [Wérei] Owis, éwēswe, wési̯o wŭ́lnā ne íst, éwāns spéket, éwon wárun wúghon woghondan, éwonwe méghan bhóron, éwonwe ghámenan, ṓku bhérondan. Owis nu éwai̯bhos wū́wet: kḗr aghna moi̯ éwens agondan néran wídandei̯. Eweis tu wū́wont: lúdhi, owei, kḗr aghna ánsamei̯ wídandibhos: ánēr, pódis, áwi̯on rō wúlnān swébhi wárnūdi nu wéramon wéstron néghi áwi̯on wŭ́lnā íst. Tód lúwus owis nu agron bhúget. | ||
:''Late Proto-Lusanic'' (Karl Svensson<ref name="karl"></ref>) | |||
:: [Wérei̯] Úis, ū́ziswe, úzi̯o ulanā ne ísti, ū́ans spéket, éūn wórun wúghon wóghondan, éūnwe mághan bhóron, éūnwe ghámenan, ṓku bhérondan. Úis nu ūobhos wū́t: kḗr aghana moi̯ ū́ins agondan néran wídandei̯. Úīs tu wūnt: lúdhi, úi, kḗr aghana ánasmei̯ wídandibhos: ánēr, pódis, ūi̯on rō ūlanān swébhi wórnūdi nu wóramon wóstaron néghi ūi̯on ŭlanā ísti. Tód lūz úis nu agron bhúget. | |||
===Notes=== | ===Notes=== | ||
<ref name="bhitar">Better do this in the morning, eh?</ref> | <ref name="bhitar">Better do this in the morning, eh?</ref> | ||
<ref name="ivanin">Aiduvitić harshly criticised Morningway's reconstruction in '''Why Morningway is Wrong: An unhealthy focus on Finio-Dhannic vocalism''' and was the first to derive forms including Limbe-Mereian data.</ref> | <ref name="ivanin">Aiduvitić harshly criticised Morningway's reconstruction in '''Why Morningway is Wrong: An unhealthy focus on Finio-Dhannic vocalism''' and was the first to derive forms including Limbe-Mereian data.</ref> | ||
<ref name="karl">Representing a late Proto-Lusanic dialect probably ancestral to the Finio-Dhannic branch with w-contamination.</ref> | |||
<references/> | <references/> | ||