3,197
edits
m (→Phonology) |
m (Adding categories.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Amkrama''' is a language in the Cramarian family, though one that is considerably eccentric even from the point of view of that loose-knit group of languages. Although the development of its lexicon from Proto-Cramarian roots is transparent enough, at some point most or all original Cramarian morphology was lost and replaced with Amkrama's odd and possibly unique system of derivation. Creolization with an independent language (of which, however, no other trace now remains) cannot be ruled out. | '''Amkrama''' is a language in the Cramarian family, though one that is considerably eccentric even from the point of view of that loose-knit group of languages. Although the development of its lexicon from Proto-Cramarian roots is transparent enough, at some point most or all original Cramarian morphology was lost and replaced with Amkrama's odd and possibly unique system of derivation. Creolization with an independent language (of which, however, no other trace now remains) cannot be ruled out. | ||
=Phonology= | ==Phonology== | ||
The phonology of Amkrama is simple, and largely derived from that of Proto-Cramarian by two simple sound-shifts: alveolar consonants became palatals, and retroflex consonants became alveolar. | The phonology of Amkrama is simple, and largely derived from that of Proto-Cramarian by two simple sound-shifts: alveolar consonants became palatals, and retroflex consonants became alveolar. | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
There is not much in the way of allophony. [z] exists as an allophone of /s/ in the environment of a voiced stop. | There is not much in the way of allophony. [z] exists as an allophone of /s/ in the environment of a voiced stop. | ||
=Morphology= | ==Morphology== | ||
All morphology in Amkrama is based on the elaboration of roots, almost all of the form CVC(C), by a series of reduplications or repetitions of sequences of sounds found within the root. | All morphology in Amkrama is based on the elaboration of roots, almost all of the form CVC(C), by a series of reduplications or repetitions of sequences of sounds found within the root. | ||
==Nouns== | ===Nouns=== | ||
Each noun is inflected in three cases (called ''Nominative, Accusative'' and ''Genitive'') and two numbers, singular and plural. | Each noun is inflected in three cases (called ''Nominative, Accusative'' and ''Genitive'') and two numbers, singular and plural. | ||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Pronouns== | ===Pronouns=== | ||
Pronouns are inflected in a manner similar to nouns, but often lacking a final vowel. | Pronouns are inflected in a manner similar to nouns, but often lacking a final vowel. | ||
Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
Only the first-person forms use distinct stems; idental stems are used for the 2nd person (''kaq'' informal, ''kas'' formal) and 3rd person (''ri'' masculine, ''ra'' feminine). | Only the first-person forms use distinct stems; idental stems are used for the 2nd person (''kaq'' informal, ''kas'' formal) and 3rd person (''ri'' masculine, ''ra'' feminine). | ||
==Verbs== | ===Verbs=== | ||
Verbs are inflected in first, second, and third person; singular and plural number; and for tense/aspect/mood forms including Stative, Imperative, Progressive, and Irrealis, as well as producing two participles (Present and Perfect) and a number of verbal nouns. | Verbs are inflected in first, second, and third person; singular and plural number; and for tense/aspect/mood forms including Stative, Imperative, Progressive, and Irrealis, as well as producing two participles (Present and Perfect) and a number of verbal nouns. | ||
Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
Though translated above with past or perfect tenses, the stative is not necessarily a past tense; rather, it indicates that the agent or patient of a verb is in a fixed state, which requires some further action to change it. For a transitive verb like √luk-, the general implication is that the state results from a past action which affected the patient. | Though translated above with past or perfect tenses, the stative is not necessarily a past tense; rather, it indicates that the agent or patient of a verb is in a fixed state, which requires some further action to change it. For a transitive verb like √luk-, the general implication is that the state results from a past action which affected the patient. | ||
[[Category:Conlangs]] | |||
[[Category:Languages]] | |||
[[Category:A priori]] | |||
[[Category:Fusional languages]] | |||
[[Category:Amkrama]] | |||
[[Category:Cramarian languages]] |
edits