Minhast: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
335 bytes added ,  20 June 2020
Line 1,691: Line 1,691:
}}
}}


Despite the degree of polysemy in the passive pronominal affixes, ambiguity is resolved via the S/O pivot; in fact it is the preservation of the S/O pivot that motivates speakers to utilize the passive voice in the first place.
Despite the degree of polysemy in the passive pronominal affixes, ambiguity is resolved via the S/O pivot; in fact it is the preservation of the S/O pivot that motivates speakers to utilize the passive voice in the first place:
 
{{Gloss
|phrase = Saxtišuhampassaxxarammā, ruwwasekaru.
| IPA = /saxtɪʃuhampamassaxxarammā, ruwwasekaru/
| morphemes = saxt-šuhap-massap-x-ar-an-mā ruwwas-ek-ar-u
| gloss = INCH-wound-sword-1S.PASS-PST-INTR-SUBORD help-1S.ACC+3S.NOM-PST-TRN
| translation = I had been wounded by the (enemy's) sword, (so) then he helped me.
}}


The forms of the Absolutive and the Passive are listed below in Table X:
The forms of the Absolutive and the Passive are listed below in Table X:
5,467

edits

Navigation menu