User:Ceige/Kamunien: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Added and clarified nominalisation
(Fixed the table, added some explanation to pronominal verb endings.)
(Added and clarified nominalisation)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
The arguments for an Eskimo-Aleut relationship are similar to the arguments for a Uralic relationship.
The arguments for an Eskimo-Aleut relationship are similar to the arguments for a Uralic relationship.


* The Spacial cases ({{sc|loc, abl, inn, ill, ins dat, all, exe, ela, pro}}) bear strong similarities to the case systems of several Inuit languages, such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenlandic_language#Case Greenlandic] and [http://www.tusaalanga.ca/node/1111 Inuktitut]. There appear to be additional innovations, and several absences, however.
* The Spacial cases ({{sc|loc, abl, ine, ill, ins dat, all, exe, ela, pro}}) bear strong similarities to the case systems of several Inuit languages, such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenlandic_language#Case Greenlandic] and [http://www.tusaalanga.ca/node/1111 Inuktitut]. There appear to be additional innovations, and several absences, however.
* The numbers correlate once again to Greenlandic and [http://www.tusaalanga.ca/node/1108 Inuktitut].
* The numbers correlate once again to Greenlandic and [http://www.tusaalanga.ca/node/1108 Inuktitut].


Line 120: Line 120:
| Ablative || -(e)ta || -(i)kka || -(i)tta || [{{sc|abl/par/gen/ben}}]
| Ablative || -(e)ta || -(i)kka || -(i)tta || [{{sc|abl/par/gen/ben}}]
|-
|-
| Locative || -mi || -ngi || -ni || at
| Locative || -mi || -ngi || -ni || at, with
|-
|-
| Ablative || -mit || -ngit || -nit || from
| Ablative || -mit || -ngit || -nit || from
Line 144: Line 144:


In total, there are approximately 15-17 cases (45-51 declension items), depending on who is describing the language.
In total, there are approximately 15-17 cases (45-51 declension items), depending on who is describing the language.
==== Nominalisation of Phrases ====
An entire phrase in Kamut can be nominalised using ''-(a)no''. This has been noted as a similarity between Kamut and Japanese (-no), although others have explained it as being an ablauted emphatic form of the Genitive ending.
Thus, ''kamungunen ano'' (bear-{{sc|du-obl-ela nmz}}) = "the thing about exiting the two bears".
Alternatively, ''-(u)va'' exists, although this is used as a quotation and question marker amongst other uses. This can be clarified by prosody (questions have a change in pitch) or by context and judgement calls by the listener.
''Kamunienami va...'' = "as for that thing you said about being with the Kamut people...".


=== Verbs ===
=== Verbs ===
Line 173: Line 182:


The pronominal endings for verbs follow a similar system to noun-cases, but the i/u distinction is instead extrapolated the sense of the speaker being the ''source'' (-i-) and the other being the ''destination'' (-u-) of the speech activity. In this sense, the grammar of Kamut breaks the fourth wall of the sentence's semantics.
The pronominal endings for verbs follow a similar system to noun-cases, but the i/u distinction is instead extrapolated the sense of the speaker being the ''source'' (-i-) and the other being the ''destination'' (-u-) of the speech activity. In this sense, the grammar of Kamut breaks the fourth wall of the sentence's semantics.
There is overlap between the case system and the pronominal system as far as -mi {{sc|loc}} and {{sc|1s}} are concerned. This is normally solved by context.


== References and Notes ==
== References and Notes ==
<references/>
<references/>
870

edits

Navigation menu