5,518
edits
m (→Negation) |
m (→Negation) |
||
| Line 2,935: | Line 2,935: | ||
=== Negation === | === Negation === | ||
Minhast has a standard negator particle ''hatā' '' ("no", "not") that comes clause-initially. It may be joined to the clause via preposed-''wa='' binding, or it may remain independent. The verbal prefix ''ta-'' is also used to negate clauses. ''Hatā' '' typically appears as a response to yes-no questions. ''Hatā' '' may co-occur with the ''ta-'' marked verb; if so ''hatā' '' is followed by a pause, unless it is joined to the clause via ''wa='' binding. | Minhast has a standard negator particle ''hatā' '' ("no", "not") that comes clause-initially. It may be joined to the clause via preposed-''wa='' binding, or it may remain independent. The verbal prefix ''ta-'' is also used to negate clauses. ''Hatā' '' typically appears as a response to yes-no questions. ''Hatā' '' may co-occur with the ''ta-'' marked verb; if so ''hatā' '' is followed by a pause, unless it is joined to the clause via ''wa='' binding. | ||
Additionally, the negative existential particle ''hambin'' may be used to negate the clause, in which case it must be bound to the clause by ''wa='', and the verb must be marked by the prefix ''ta-''. The ''hambin''-construction is particularly emphatic, and is best translated as "There is no one who..." or "There is nothing that...". An interesting thing to note is that the ''hambin''-construction operates on an S/A pivot, demonstrating split ergativity at the syntactic level. The positive counterpart of the ''hambin''-construction, i.e. the ''matti''-construction, also demonstrates syntactic split ergativity as it too operates on an S/A pivot. | |||
The following examples illustrate the usage of ''hatā''', ''ta-'', and ''hambin'' for negation: | The following examples illustrate the usage of ''hatā''', ''ta-'', and ''hambin'' for negation: | ||
edits