Chlouvānem/Morphology: Difference between revisions

Chlouvānem/Morphology (view source)

No change in size , 2 April 2017

m

8,577

edits

@@ Line 1,067: / Line 1,067: @@
 These verbs all have their cause in the exessive case (or a subjunctive verb) and the affected being in the dative; gårḍake usually only has a subjunctive. Examples:
 : ''låh tamiāt maivat hælьtitь'' “what (s)he said <small>(literally: his/her word)</small> moved me.”
-: ''glidriṭṭup låh ñælftė'' “I’m sorry for how I behaved.”
+: ''glidrirāyem låh ñælftė'' “I’m sorry for how I behaved.”
-: ''priūsimęliupsętå gårḍitь'' “you were meant to give it back to me” (literally: it was meant that you give it back to me<ref>Note that in such a phrase the perfective subjunctive would have a different meaning, namely “to have already given it back to me”.</ref>) .
+: ''priūsimęlīṃsętå gårḍitь'' “you were meant to give it back to me” (literally: it was meant that you give it back to me<ref>Note that in such a phrase the perfective subjunctive would have a different meaning, namely “to have already given it back to me”.</ref>) .
 Derived forms usually behave as impersonal too, like ''taprābake'' (to hate).