Linguifex:Arbitration/Requests/Case: Difference between revisions
Chrysophylax (talk | contribs) |
Herr Dunkel (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
=== Statement by {Party 3} === | === Statement by {Party 3} === | ||
I claim that Waahlis should not have rolled back my blanking of my talk page, and then further justified it with policies he implemented after said blanking.<br/>I have provided examples from both the German Federal and Swedish constitutions where both of those disallow such retroactive application of new policies as a general guideline to show that such retroactive application of new policies isn't endorsed by at least two democratic nations.<br/>18:09, 16 January 2013 (CET) | |||
=== Clerk notes === | === Clerk notes === | ||
Revision as of 17:09, 16 January 2013
This is the page where all cases for arbitration may be initiated. Please do not open a case yourself, only the Owner-in-Council may.
Case
Abuse of Authority by Waahlis
Initiated by 
Chrysophylax at 23:13, 15 January 2013 (CET)
Involved parties
- Chrysophylax (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Waahlis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), Party 2
- Herr_Dunkel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log), Party 3
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
Statement by {Party 1}
I would like to see proper wording by both users regarding the actions taken on the 14th of January and of the accusations. Please, add your statements. Try to be concise. Do not edit any field but your own. Any such edits which do not conform to this will be instantly reverted. Do note, this is not the actual case, but a formal filing of one.
Statement by {Party 2}
Statement by {Party 3}
I claim that Waahlis should not have rolled back my blanking of my talk page, and then further justified it with policies he implemented after said blanking.
I have provided examples from both the German Federal and Swedish constitutions where both of those disallow such retroactive application of new policies as a general guideline to show that such retroactive application of new policies isn't endorsed by at least two democratic nations.
18:09, 16 January 2013 (CET)
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).