User talk:Waahlis: Difference between revisions

Line 70: Line 70:


I disagree. Cw, for "contionary word", is simply more compressed. I would even suggest a Template:C. And being easy on the eyes is surely not a problem when processing wiki markup. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]'''  22:38, 20 January 2013 (CET)
I disagree. Cw, for "contionary word", is simply more compressed. I would even suggest a Template:C. And being easy on the eyes is surely not a problem when processing wiki markup. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]'''  22:38, 20 January 2013 (CET)
The main reason for using wiki markup is for enhanced legibility and ease of use, thus instead of using <pre><a href="linguifex.com/?title=Contionary:word>word</a></pre> we usually write <pre>[[Contionary:word|word]]</pre>
Continuing from that, the prefix "cw" isn't instantly recognisable compared to "term" which is but 2 characters longer but adds an instantly transparent meaning.
Cf. <pre>
===Etymology ===
{{term|cóm-}} + {{term|seneir}}
</pre>
with
<pre>
===Etymology ===
{{cw|cóm-}} + {{cw|seneir}}
</pre>
Of course I see the benefit of having a short short version for when linking in mainspace articles/talk pages as in <nowiki>{{cw|dón}}</nowiki> where editing of the wikicode might not be a very relevant factor.
As a compromise of sorts I propose keeping <pre>{{template|term}}</pre> in the Contionary article main space and <pre>{{template|cw}}</pre> used outside.
[[File:Admin.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Chrysophylax|<span style="color: #3366BB ;">Chrysophylax</span>]]''' 23:05, 20 January 2013 (CET)