Template talk:Calc/headness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The word order headedness values don't make a lot of sense... SOV > SVO > VSO > OSV > OVS > VOS? "Overall headedness" is most closely correlated with the order of V and O, and...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The word order headedness values don't make a lot of sense... SOV > SVO > VSO > OSV > OVS > VOS? "Overall headedness" is most closely correlated with the order of V and O, and less so with V and S, V being the head in both cases. [[User:Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd|Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd]] ([[User talk:Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd|talk]]) 14:10, 21 January 2014 (CET) | The word order headedness values don't make a lot of sense... SOV > SVO > VSO > OSV > OVS > VOS? "Overall headedness" is most closely correlated with the order of V and O, and less so with V and S, V being the head in both cases. [[User:Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd|Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd]] ([[User talk:Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd|talk]]) 14:10, 21 January 2014 (CET) | ||
I am not a supporter of the Classmeter and its components, I think it is difficult to calculate and average linguistical features. If you are proficient in the coding, I give you all the rights to change and adapt the template to improve its accuracy. That said, well... There are always problems with regularisations like this one. [[File:Waahlis.png|35px|link=Linguifex:Administrators]] '''[[User talk:Waahlis|<span style="color: Orange;">Waahlis</span>]]''' 19:52, 22 January 2014 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 18:52, 22 January 2014
The word order headedness values don't make a lot of sense... SOV > SVO > VSO > OSV > OVS > VOS? "Overall headedness" is most closely correlated with the order of V and O, and less so with V and S, V being the head in both cases. Ílchőfti Lēmáthīd (talk) 14:10, 21 January 2014 (CET)
I am not a supporter of the Classmeter and its components, I think it is difficult to calculate and average linguistical features. If you are proficient in the coding, I give you all the rights to change and adapt the template to improve its accuracy. That said, well... There are always problems with regularisations like this one. 
Waahlis 19:52, 22 January 2014 (CET)