Lakovic languages
Lexicon of Proto-Lakovic roots
Swadesh lists for the Lakovic languages
Lakovic languages/Sketchbook
| Lakovic | |
|---|---|
| Created by | – |
| Geographic distribution | Originally Bjeheond, Talma and Txapoalli; today worldwide |
| Linguistic classification | One of Tricin's primary language families |
| Proto-language | Proto-Lakovic |
| Subdivisions |
|
The Lakovic languages (/ləˈkoʊvɪk/ lə-KOH-vik; Windermere: fi imbrits Lăcof Bjeheondian: [vɪ (ʔ)ɪmˈbrits ləˈkaov]) are a major Trician language family, originally native to Bjeheond. The family is inspired by Semitic, Mon-Khmer and Austronesian languages.
The family is named after *läkoF, the PLak reconstructed word for 'human'. *läkoF is the etymon of Windermere Wen Lăchua '(poetic) Wen Dămea', Tseer lakow 'free', and several other ethnonyms of Lakovic-speaking peoples such as Dak'ox. Template:Windermere sidebar
Todo
Language with dissimilated reduplicated plurals/verbs
some confusion between derivational affixes and trigger/applicatives in Ashanic
an ergative Lakovic language
a Txapoallian Lakovic language with a possessed classifier system
Urheimat
The Proto-Lakovic urheimat is thought to have been Bjeheond, based on the distribution of the family and reconstructed Proto-Lakovic vocabulary for Bjeheondian fauna and flora and tropical rainy and dry seasons.
Proto-Lakovic culture
Phylogeny
Most scholars agree on the following major branches:
Phonology
The reconstructed phonology of PLak
Consonants
| Labial | Dental | Domed | Palatal | Velar | Laryngeal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasal | *m /m/ | *n /n/ | *ŋ /ŋ/ | ||||
| Plosive | voiced | *b /b/ | *d /d/ | *g /ɡ/ | |||
| voiceless | *p /p/ | *t /t/ | *k /k/ | *Q, *ʔ /ʔ/ | |||
| Affricate | *c /t͡s/ | *ć /t͡ʂ/ | |||||
| Fricative | *F /ɸ/ | *s /s/ | *ś /ʂ/ | *š /ʃ/ | *X, *H | ||
| Resonant | *w /w/ | *l /l/ | *r /r/ | *y /j/ | |||
Little is known about the laryngeals *Q, *H, *X. Some conjectured realizations are:
- Q = /ʔ/ or /q/
- H = /ʁ/ (causes pharyngealized vowels in Æ)
- X = /h/, /x/ or /ç/
The laryngeals may have developed allophones in different environments, leading to conditioned reflexes in daughter lnaguages.
Vowels
i u e o ä a
ä is thought to have been short /a/ or /ɐ/ while a was long /aː/.
Phonotactics
Proto-Lakovic was dominated by CV or CVC syllables. Some prefixes and infixes resulted in CC- initials.
Proto-Lakovic morphology
Should be less like Idavic/Netagin
Root structure
Roots consisted of a sequence of consonants plus an inherent vowel. There was schwebeablaut: the vowel could change position within the root. The roots could be of the form
- biconsonantal roots alternating between CVC and CCV. Example: sep ~ spe 'to walk'
- triconsonantal roots alternating between CCVC, CVCC, and CVCVC. Example: ptsun ~ putsn ~ putsun 'to live'
- 4-consonant roots like cpalg ~ cplag 'to cry out' (Wdm. tspong 'to demand' and tsloc 'to cry out')
Statistically, biconsonantal roots in Lakovic are somewhat more common than in Semitic; triconsonantal roots are derived from biconsonantals via root extensions. One example is *Fedn "animal" and *Fdek "to inhabit", both derived from the root *Fed "to exist".
Various prefixes, infixes and suffixes were added to derive words. Some infixes had 2 allomorphs, either as an infix or as a prefix: C<əC>CVC or C-CVC/C-CVCC.
Three-consonant roots had 3 ablaut grades, traditionally called:
- Verbal grade: CCVC
- Nominal grade: CVCC
- Long nominal grade: CVCVC
The CVCC grade had some reflexes with either the first C assimilating into V or the second C (explain some words like muad, yar or -b, -d finals)
Weak roots
Weak roots such as *yriš 'to think' and *sapQ 'to pull' have irregularities in their allomorphs, like weak roots in Semitic. The weak consonants are y, w, H, and Q.
With week roots, either the verbal stem (e.g. yriš > riš) or the nominal stem (sap' > sap 'to pull, to drag') or both are shortened, and either drops or assimilates the weak consonant.
Nouns
Nouns were pluralized by total reduplication:
- lakof 'person' > lakof-lakof 'people'
- ptek 'flesh' > ptek-ptek 'a large quantity of flesh'
There was an honorific suffix -is/-s. The semantic shift from honorific to feminine was an areal feature of Talman Lakovic languages.
Nouns had no morphological case; genitive noun phrases were formed by concatenation.
Ashanic developed a new associative plural suffix -am, from PLak päm 'that; those' (the -am in Modern Windermere plural pronouns łănam, ănam).
Case markers
Case markers came before the noun:
- xu = direct case (the noun in focus)
- Hit = indirect case
Pronouns
Most branches of Lakovic show evidence for the following PLak pronouns:
- *riH = I
- *bäŋ = we (dual inclusive)
- *śen = thou
- *śens = thou (hon)
- *Qin = s/he
- *Qins = s/he (hon)
PLak had no plural pronouns; it made do with associative plurals or demonstratives instead.
Verbs and adjectives
Proto-Lakovic was a verb-heavy language: verbs contained enough information that a sentence could consist of just a verb, and context made sense of the meaning.
Verbs inflected for triggers, TAM, pluractionality, evidentiality, and gender agreement. Present-day Lakovic languages preserve these inflections to varying levels.
Gender
- wa- = honorific
TAM
- unmarked or li- = imperfective
- -H = perfective
- hem- = change of state for statives?
- various reduplifixes for other TAMs:
- F(M)ä- = iterative
- FaL- = intensive
- ⟨iL⟩, qol-⟨iL⟩- almost X, X a little
- saL- = inceptive
- HenFa- = frequentative
- taFi- = graduative
- ongFa- = X for oneself, X in advance
Triggers
Triggers (giving the noun in the direct case specific semantic roles) were marked by adding infixes to the verbal grade of the root. Proto-Lakovic had eight triggers:
- agent trigger: unmarked?
- patient trigger: ⟨əp⟩
- destination trigger: ⟨əŋ⟩
- locative trigger: ⟨it⟩
- ablative/cause trigger: ⟨əm/nəm⟩
- instrument trigger: ⟨əg⟩
- benefactive trigger: ⟨əkəm⟩
- comitative trigger: ⟨lis⟩
In most branches (Ashanic, Tseeric, Tumhanic, Pfiunic, Häskä, Tsrovesh), the original trigger system became a set of derivational affixes, much like binyanim (originally marking voice) in Semitic languages. Txapoallian Lakovic reinterpreted the trigger system into a more head-marking, polysynthetic system. Only some modern Eta-Lakovic languages retain a trigger system today.
Nominalization
The most common ways to form deverbal nouns were:
- Using the nominal grade CVCC of the root
- The ⟨ay⟩ infix
- using instrument, place and agent affixes.
Derivational morphology
Schwebeablaut
Three-consonant roots had 3 ablaut grades, traditionally called:
- Verbal grade: CCVC
- Nominal grade: CVCC
- Long nominal grade: CVCVC
Root extensions
There is much evidence that the truly basic roots were CVC~CCV roots, and CVCC~CCVC roots were derived from CVC~CCV via suffixing a third root consonant.
- ngit = to happen
- ngitw~ngtiw = new
Affixes
- ⟨-s⟩: honorific, nominalization
- Source of breathy voice ablaut in Wdm.
- ⟨r⟩ prefix or infix: non-volitional or passive verbs
- Ashanic *⟨àr⟩, Wdm. ⟨ră⟩, ⟨năr/măr⟩
- ⟨ay⟩ = deverbal noun
- ⟨ong⟩ = place noun
- ⟨X⟩ = agentive or instrument
- Wdm root vowel breathiness
- ⟨aH⟩ = verb forming prefix or infix
- Wdm initial voicing, sometimes also breathy root vowel
- biH- = agentive
- Wdm. pă- + voicing (not productive)
- Tseer ba-
- ha- = resultative (passive in Windermere)
- t- = intensive, denominals
- Wdm. th- or t- (not productive)
- Qu- = intensive
- Wdm. th-u-
- ya- = adjectivizer; from ya 'with'
- Wdm. yă-, Tseer xi-, Häskä yə-
- f- = negative; the opposite or undoing of X
- not productive in Wdm
- Tseer ø-
Proto-Lakovic syntax
Proto-Lakovic had flexible word order, but the most common word order was VSO.
Triggers
- spe-H Hit Qopr-is Xu riH (walk-PFV IND height-FEM DIR 1SG) = I walked up high (neutral)
- s<əŋ>pe-H Hit riH Xu Qopris (<DEST>walk-PFV IND 1SG DIR high) = I walked up high (emphasis on "up high")
Copular sentences
Proto-Lakovic was zero-copula (different descendants use different etymologies for the copula).
This caused some triggers to be reinterpreted as noun-deriving affixes in some daughter languages. Demonstration by contrived example, with the instrument trigger:
- p⟨ək⟩tuś Hit riH Hit Qin Xu məHokis.
- ⟨INST⟩stab IND 1SG IND 3SG.M DIR stone-F
- I stabbed him with the stone.
was reinterpreted as something like "The stone was my stabbing-instrument [for piercing] him".
Sample text
The Round Table
x = some laryngeal idk what
Pre-Wdm homorganic nasals cause urú in Wdm while heteroganic nasals become homorganic nasals?
Ngiiθ dur mahagor se taχ χaaθ. "Măra łĭnam?" tăbits φin Pĭda Brăwid.
Pre-Naengic "reconstruction": ŋiHt ntor mångår Se dak kaHt. "meH ra śenam?" dambic pin binta PN.
Mi-ăngnuung căχθaaθ năθa emrĭtsal sen doon: "Șrüχ te-stiiw: taχ mognas, θaφ te-müts θraaφ, liw stăliiw, θaφ te-müts mălsaaχ, taχ mălüüts, doon tălaχ."
Pre-Naengic: "mi ngXnuung katkaat nåtaX hemrecal sen Hdån: "šruk day ătsHiw: dak månknas, tap day amHuc tramp, liw atsalHiw, tak malHuc, n-dHon talak." (implying mp > bh > φ?)
"Ǎna mee ra, srü hĭdeen croθ năθa?" tăbits φin Pĭda Brăwid.
Pre-Ashanic: Ha-Hna meH ra, sru henxden gråt nåtaX? dambic pin binta PN. (PLak -aq > -a while -a > *-ā > -o)
"Op cănga, φin Pĭda: tsor pădiχ φnărtaang, te ămsaχ păχwădiχ năθa ya φin croθ φi!" eφθooc φin χaaθ.
Åb gaŋaq, pin Binta: cår bindik panratHaŋ, day Famsak (Fanpsak?) pinkawantik nåtaX yaq pin gråt pi! emp-tHåk(?) pin kaHt.
"Ăruy șa-χaaθ ses tsărüng te sen θăpal φănaw φănaw." esngim șa φin χaaθ φin Pĭda Brăwid.
empsxngim šaX-kaHt se se caruŋ sen tapal panaw panaw." empsxngim šaX pin kaHt pin binta PN.
(todo: double check, account for Grassmann. This also omits gender affixes.)