Lakovic languages: Difference between revisions
m (→Pronouns) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
mNo edit summary |
||
(121 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Lakovic languages/Sketchbook]] | [[Lakovic languages/Sketchbook]] | ||
{{Infobox language family | {{Infobox language family | ||
| setting = [[Verse: | | setting = [[Verse:Hmøøh|Hmøøh]] | ||
| region = | | region = Bjeheond, Talma, Etalocin, Txapoalli | ||
| name = Lakovic | | name = Lakovic | ||
| familycolor = lakovic | | familycolor = lakovic | ||
| family = One of | | family = One of Hmøøh's primary language families | ||
| protoname = Proto-Lakovic | | protoname = Proto-Lakovic | ||
| child1 = [[Naengic languages|Naengic]] | | child1 = [[Naengic languages|Naengic]] | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| child5 = Txapoallian Lakovic | | child5 = Txapoallian Lakovic | ||
| child6 = Pfiunic | | child6 = Pfiunic | ||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Lakovic languages''' (/ləˈkoʊvɪk/ ''lə-KOH-vik''; [[ | The '''Lakovic languages''' (/ləˈkoʊvɪk/ ''lə-KOH-vik''; [[Naeng]]: ''fi imbrits Lăcof'' <small>Bjeheondian:</small> [vɪ (ʔ)ɪmˈbrits ləˈkaov]) are a major [[Verse:Hmøøh|Hmøøhian]] language family, originally native to [[Verse:Hmøøh/Bjeheond|Bjeheond]]. The most populous members of the family are the Nakwax dialect continuum spoken in Txapoalli, the [[Æ]] language of northwest Taivíor, and the (usually mutually intelligible) vernaculars derived from Classical Tseer. The family is inspired by Semitic, Mon-Khmer and Austronesian languages. | ||
The family is named after * | The family is named after *lakof, the PLak reconstructed word for 'human'. *lakof is the etymon of [[Naeng]] ''Wen Lăchua'' '(poetic) [[Verse:Hmøøh/Wen Dămea|Wen Dămea]]', [[Tseer]] ''lakow'' 'free', and several other ethnonyms of Lakovic-speaking peoples such as [[Dak'ox]]. | ||
{{Windermere sidebar}} | {{Windermere sidebar}} | ||
Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
a Txapoallian Lakovic language with a possessed classifier system | a Txapoallian Lakovic language with a possessed classifier system | ||
A Dinka-like language | |||
==Urheimat== | ==Urheimat== | ||
The Proto-Lakovic urheimat is thought to have been [[Verse: | The Proto-Lakovic urheimat is thought to have been [[Verse:Hmøøh/Bjeheond|Bjeheond]], based on the distribution of the family and reconstructed Proto-Lakovic vocabulary for Bjeheondian fauna and flora and Mediterranean-climate rainy winters and dry summers. | ||
==Proto-Lakovic culture== | ===Proto-Lakovic culture=== | ||
==Phylogeny== | ==Phylogeny== | ||
Most scholars agree on the following major branches: | Most scholars agree on the following major branches: | ||
*[[ | *[[Naeng languages|Naengic]] (aka Ashanic) | ||
**[[ | **[[Naeng/Classical|Classical Naeng]] | ||
***[[ | ***[[Naeng|Modern Naeng]] | ||
***[[Sătmașian]] | ***[[Sătmașian]] | ||
***[[Trây]] | ***[[Trây]] | ||
***[[Pradiul]] | ***[[Pradiul]] | ||
*Tseeric | *Tseeric | ||
**Classical Tseer | **Classical Tseer | ||
***Modern [[Tseer]] | ***Modern [[Tseer]] | ||
*[[Häskä]] | *[[Häskä]] | ||
* [[Shalaian]] | |||
*[[Pfiunian]] dialect continuum (Pseudo-Swiss German) | |||
*Txapoallian Lakovic | *Txapoallian Lakovic | ||
**[[ | **[[Tsăloșian]] dialect continuum (near Sowaazhpi) | ||
*[[ | **Lakwax/Dakwax/Nakwax (Ejective-y head-final language; influenced [[Naquian]]) | ||
* Lakovic isolates: | |||
** [[!Zoom]] | |||
** [[Æ]] | |||
==Phonology== | ==Phonology== | ||
The reconstructed phonology of PLak | The reconstructed phonology of PLak | ||
===Consonants=== | ===Consonants=== | ||
{| class=" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan=2 | | ! colspan=2 | | ||
! | Labial | ! | Labial | ||
! | Dental | ! | Dental/Alveolar | ||
! | | ! | Lateral | ||
! | Palatal | ! | Palatal | ||
! | Velar | ! | Velar | ||
Line 78: | Line 77: | ||
! colspan="2" | Nasal | ! colspan="2" | Nasal | ||
| '''*m''' /m/ | | '''*m''' /m/ | ||
| '''*n''' /n/ | | '''*n''' /n{{den}}/ | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 84: | Line 83: | ||
| | | | ||
|-align=center | |-align=center | ||
! rowspan=" | ! rowspan="3" | Plosive | ||
! <small>voiceless</small> | |||
| '''*p''' /p/ | |||
| '''*t''' /t{{den}}/ | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| '''*k''' /k/ | |||
| '''*ʔ''' /ʔ/ | |||
|-align=center | |||
! <small>voiced</small> | ! <small>voiced</small> | ||
| '''*b''' /b/ | | '''*b''' /b/ | ||
| '''*d''' /d/ | | '''*d''' /d{{den}}/ | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 93: | Line 100: | ||
| | | | ||
|-align=center | |-align=center | ||
! <small> | ! <small>implosive</small> | ||
| '''* | | '''*ƀ''' /ɓ/ | ||
| '''* | | '''*đ''' /ɗ/ | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
| | |||
| | | | ||
|-align=center | |-align=center | ||
! colspan="2" | Affricate | ! colspan="2" | Affricate | ||
| | | | ||
| '''*c''' / | | '''*c''' /t͡{{den}}s{{den}}/ | ||
| '''*ć''' / | | '''*ć''' /t͡ɬ/ | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Line 110: | Line 117: | ||
|-align=center | |-align=center | ||
! colspan="2" | Fricative | ! colspan="2" | Fricative | ||
| '''* | | '''*f''' /ɸ/ | ||
| '''*s''' /s/ | | '''*s''' /s{{den}}/ | ||
| '''*ś''' / | | '''*ś''' /ɬ/ | ||
| '''*š''' /ʃ/ | | '''*š''' /ʃ/ | ||
| | | '''*x''' /χ/ | ||
| '''* | | '''*h''' /ɦ/ | ||
|-align=center | |-align=center | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 121: | Line 128: | ||
! colspan="2" | Resonant | ! colspan="2" | Resonant | ||
| '''*w''' /w/ | | '''*w''' /w/ | ||
| '''*r''' /r/ | | '''*r''' /r/ | ||
| '''*l''' /l{{den}}/ | |||
| '''*y''' /j/ | | '''*y''' /j/ | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
The voiceless stops '''p t k ts tś''' were weakly aspirated like Japanese voiceless stops. | |||
'''m n l r''' could be syllabic in unstressed affixes. | |||
===Vowels=== | ===Vowels=== | ||
''i u e o | ''i u e o ă a'' | ||
'' | ''ă'' is thought to have been short /a/ or /ɐ/ while ''a'' was long /aː/. ''a'' could not occur unstressed and regularly reduced to ''ă''. | ||
===Phonotactics=== | ===Phonotactics=== | ||
Line 143: | Line 147: | ||
==Proto-Lakovic morphology== | ==Proto-Lakovic morphology== | ||
===Root structure=== | ===Root structure=== | ||
Roots consisted of a sequence of consonants plus an inherent vowel. There was schwebeablaut: the vowel could change position within the root. The roots could be of the form | Roots consisted of a sequence of consonants plus an inherent vowel. There was schwebeablaut: the vowel could change position within the root. The roots could be of the form | ||
Line 150: | Line 153: | ||
#4-consonant roots like cpalg ~ cplag 'to cry out' (Wdm. ''tspong'' 'to demand' and ''tsloc'' 'to cry out') | #4-consonant roots like cpalg ~ cplag 'to cry out' (Wdm. ''tspong'' 'to demand' and ''tsloc'' 'to cry out') | ||
Statistically, biconsonantal roots in Lakovic are somewhat more common than in Semitic; triconsonantal roots are derived from biconsonantals via root extensions. One example is * | Statistically, biconsonantal roots in Lakovic are somewhat more common than in Semitic; triconsonantal roots are derived from biconsonantals via root extensions. One example is *Hedn "being" and *Hdek "to inhabit", both derived from the root *Hed "to exist". | ||
Various prefixes, infixes and suffixes were added to derive words. Some infixes had 2 allomorphs, either as an infix or as a prefix: C<əC>CVC or C-CVC/C-CVCC. | Various prefixes, infixes and suffixes were added to derive words. Some infixes had 2 allomorphs, either as an infix or as a prefix: C<əC>CVC or C-CVC/C-CVCC. | ||
Line 160: | Line 163: | ||
The CVCC grade had some reflexes with either the first C assimilating into V or the second C (explain some words like muad, yar or -b, -d finals) | The CVCC grade had some reflexes with either the first C assimilating into V or the second C (explain some words like muad, yar or -b, -d finals) | ||
The long nominal grade first arose in Late Proto-Lakovic: the nominal grade CVCC turned to CVCVC when doing so epenthesized less "nice" consonant clusters. Then CVCVC became analyzed as a new ablaut grade. | |||
====Weak roots==== | ====Weak roots==== | ||
''Weak roots'' such as *yriš 'to think' and * | ''Weak roots'' such as *yriš 'to think' and *săpQ 'to pull' have irregularities in their allomorphs, like weak roots in Semitic. The weak consonants are y, w, H, and Q. | ||
With week roots, either the verbal stem (e.g. ''yriš'' > ''riš'') or the nominal stem (''sap''' > ''sap'' 'to pull, to drag') or both are shortened, and either drops or assimilates the weak consonant. | With week roots, either the verbal stem (e.g. ''yriš'' > ''riš'') or the nominal stem (''sap''' > ''sap'' 'to pull, to drag') or both are shortened, and either drops or assimilates the weak consonant. This leads to apparent irregularities like nominal yirš ~ verbal riš. | ||
===Nouns=== | ===Nouns=== | ||
Nouns were pluralized by total reduplication: | Nouns were pluralized by total reduplication: | ||
*'' | *''lăkof'' 'person' > ''lăkof-lăkof'' 'people' | ||
*'' | *''lban'' 'water > ''lban-lban'' 'a lot of water' | ||
Nouns had no morphological case; genitive noun phrases were formed by concatenation. | Nouns had no morphological case; genitive noun phrases were formed by concatenation. | ||
Naengic developed a new associative plural suffix ''-am'', from PLak ''păm'' 'that; those (distal demonstrative)' (the ''-am'' in Modern Windermere plural pronouns ''łănam'', ''ănam''). | |||
===Pronouns=== | ===Pronouns=== | ||
Line 186: | Line 184: | ||
*''*riH'' = I | *''*riH'' = I | ||
*''* | *''*băŋ'' = we (dual inclusive) | ||
*''*śen'' = thou | *''*śen'' = thou | ||
*''*śens'' = thou (hon) | *''*śens'' = thou (hon) | ||
*''* | *''*ʔin'' = s/he | ||
*''* | *''*ʔins'' = s/he (hon) | ||
PLak had no plural pronouns; it made do with associative plurals or demonstratives instead. | PLak had no plural pronouns; it made do with associative plurals or demonstratives instead. | ||
Line 198: | Line 196: | ||
Verbs inflected for triggers, TAM, pluractionality, evidentiality, and gender agreement. Present-day Lakovic languages preserve these inflections to varying levels. | Verbs inflected for triggers, TAM, pluractionality, evidentiality, and gender agreement. Present-day Lakovic languages preserve these inflections to varying levels. | ||
====TAM==== | ====TAM==== | ||
The following verb affixes marked lexical aspect and voice/transitivity/denominality. | |||
*unmarked or li- = imperfective | *unmarked or li- = imperfective | ||
*-H = perfective | *-H = perfective | ||
*hem- = change of state for statives? | *hem- = change of state for statives? | ||
*various reduplifixes for other TAMs: | *various reduplifixes for other TAMs: | ||
**F(M) | **F(M)ă- = iterative | ||
**FaL- = intensive | **FaL- = intensive | ||
**{{angbr|iL}}, qol-{{angbr|iL}}- almost X, X a little | **{{angbr|iL}}, qol-{{angbr|iL}}- almost X, X a little | ||
** | **săL- = inceptive | ||
** | **HenFă- = frequentative | ||
** | **tăFi- = graduative | ||
** | **ongFă- = X for oneself, X in advance | ||
* {{angbr|ăp}} | |||
* {{angbr|ăŋ}} | |||
* {{angbr|it}} | |||
* {{angbr|ăm/năm}} | |||
* {{angbr|ăg}} | |||
* {{angbr|kăm}} | |||
* {{angbr|lis}} | |||
====Nominalization==== | ====Nominalization==== | ||
The most common ways to form deverbal nouns were: | The most common ways to form deverbal nouns were: | ||
*Using the nominal grade CVCC of the root | *Using the nominal grade CVCC of the root | ||
*The {{angbr| | *The {{angbr|ăy}} infix | ||
*using instrument, place and agent affixes. | *using instrument, place and agent affixes. | ||
Line 239: | Line 230: | ||
*'''Nominal grade''': CVCC | *'''Nominal grade''': CVCC | ||
*'''Long nominal grade''': CVCVC | *'''Long nominal grade''': CVCVC | ||
The distinction is best preserved in non-Talman Lakovic languages, and to an extent Naeng; the Talman ones went fast and loose with ablaut grades just like most branches of IE did. | |||
====Root extensions==== | ====Root extensions==== | ||
Line 249: | Line 241: | ||
**Source of breathy voice ablaut in Wdm. | **Source of breathy voice ablaut in Wdm. | ||
*{{angbr|r}} prefix or infix: non-volitional or passive verbs | *{{angbr|r}} prefix or infix: non-volitional or passive verbs | ||
**Ashanic *{{angbr|àr}}, Wdm. {{angbr|ră}}, {{angbr| | **Ashanic *{{angbr|àr}}, Wdm. {{angbr|ră}}, {{angbr|ngăr/măr}} | ||
*{{angbr| | *{{angbr|ăy}} = deverbal noun | ||
*{{angbr|ong}} = place noun | *{{angbr|ong}} = place noun | ||
*{{angbr|X}} = agentive or instrument | *{{angbr|X}} = agentive or instrument | ||
**Wdm root vowel breathiness | **Wdm root vowel breathiness | ||
*{{angbr| | *{{angbr|ăf}} = verb forming prefix or infix | ||
**Wdm initial voicing, sometimes also breathy root vowel | **Wdm initial voicing, sometimes also breathy root vowel | ||
* | *bif- = agentive | ||
**Wdm. ''pă-'' + voicing (not productive) | **Wdm. ''pă-'' + voicing (not productive) | ||
**Tseer ''ba-'' | **Tseer ''ba-'' | ||
* | *xă- = resultative (passive in Windermere) | ||
*t- = intensive, denominals | *t- = intensive, denominals | ||
**Wdm. ''th-'' or ''t-'' (not productive) | **Wdm. ''th-'' or ''t-'' (not productive) | ||
*Qu- = intensive | *Qu- = intensive | ||
**Wdm. ''th-u-'' | **Wdm. ''th-u-'' | ||
* | *yă- = adjectivizer; from ''yă'' 'with' | ||
**Wdm. ''yă-'', Tseer ''xi-'', Häskä ''yə-'' | **Wdm. ''yă-'', Tseer ''xi-'', Häskä ''yə-'' | ||
* ''f-'' = negative; the opposite or undoing of X | * ''f-'' = negative; the opposite or undoing of X | ||
Line 271: | Line 263: | ||
==Proto-Lakovic syntax== | ==Proto-Lakovic syntax== | ||
Proto-Lakovic had | Proto-Lakovic had unmarked word order VSO. | ||
===Triggers=== | ===Triggers=== | ||
*''spe- | *''spe-f fit Qopr-is ŋă rif'' (walk-PFV IND height-FEM DIR 1SG) = I walked up high (neutral) | ||
*''s<əŋ>pe- | *''s<əŋ>pe-f fit rif ŋă Qopris'' (<DEST>walk-PFV IND 1SG DIR high) = I walked up high (emphasis on "up high") | ||
===Copular sentences=== | ===Copular sentences=== | ||
Line 280: | Line 272: | ||
This caused some triggers to be reinterpreted as noun-deriving affixes in some daughter languages. Demonstration by contrived example, with the instrument trigger: | This caused some triggers to be reinterpreted as noun-deriving affixes in some daughter languages. Demonstration by contrived example, with the instrument trigger: | ||
:'''''p{{angbr| | :'''''p{{angbr|ăk}}tuś fit rif fit Qin ŋă măXokis.''''' | ||
:{{angbr|INST}}stab IND 1SG IND 3SG.M DIR stone-F | :{{angbr|INST}}stab IND 1SG IND 3SG.M DIR stone-F | ||
:''I stabbed him with the stone.'' | :''I stabbed him with the stone.'' | ||
was reinterpreted as something like "The stone was my stabbing-instrument [for piercing] him". | was reinterpreted as something like "The stone was my stabbing-instrument [for piercing] him". | ||
Copular sentences are zero-copula and do not use case markers except ''Hit'': ''biHdaŋ Hit lakoF.'' = 'The person is a soldier/warrior.' | |||
Some "adjectives" are actually prepositional phrases instead of verbs: | |||
''*Xu Qopr fit fedn Xtăr.'' (PRED high.NOM DIR creature black) 'The black one is up high.' | |||
== Sample text == | |||
=== The Round Table === | |||
<!--x = some laryngeal idk what | |||
Pre-Wdm homorganic nasals cause urú in Wdm while heteroganic nasals become homorganic nasals? | |||
Pre-Naengic word for word "reconstruction", not guaranteed to be grammatical in PLak | |||
<poem> | |||
Ngiiθ dur mogor se taχ χaaθ. "Măra łĭnam?" tăbits φin Pĭda Brăwid. | |||
ŋiHt Vntor måŋgår se dak kaHt. "meH ra śenam?" dambic pin bindaq PN. | |||
Mi-ăngnuung căχθaaθ năθa emrĭtsal sen doon: "Șrüχ te-stiiw: taχ mognas, θaφ te-müts θraaφ, liw stăliiw, θaφ te-müts mălsaaχ, taχ mălüüts, doon tălaχ." | |||
"mi ngXnuung katkHat nåtaX hemrecal sen Hdån: "šruk day ătsHiw: dak månknas, tap day amHuc tramp, liw atsalHiw, tak malHuc, n-dHon talak." (implying mp > bh > φ?) | |||
"Ǎna mee ra, srü hĭdeen croθ năθa?" tăbits φin Pĭda Brăwid. | |||
"Ha-na meH ra, sru xeHden gråt nåtaX?" dambic pin bindaq PN. (PLak -aq > -a while -a > *-ā > -o) | |||
"Op cănga, φin Pĭda: tsor pădiχ φnărtaang, te ămsaχ păχwădiχ năθa ya φin croθ φi!" eφθooc φin χaaθ. | |||
Åb gaŋaq, pin Binta: cår bindik panradHaŋ, day Famsak (Fanpsak?) pinkawandik nåtaX yaq pin gråt pi! emp-tHåk(?) pin kaHt. | |||
"Ăruy șa-χaaθ ses tsărüng te sen θăpal φănaw φănaw." esngim șa φin χaaθ φin Pĭda Brăwid. | |||
qaroy šaX-kaHt se se caruŋ sen tapal panaw panaw." empsxngim šaX pin kaHt pin bindaq PN. | |||
</poem> | |||
(todo: double check, account for Grassmann. This also omits gender affixes.) | |||
--> | |||
''**ŋift ntor mangār se dak kaft. "mef raq śen ʔam?" dambic pin bindaq PN. mi qangfnung katkfat nataX qemrecal sen Hdān: "šruk day qatsHiw: dak manknas, tap day amfuc ftom, liw qatsalfiw, tak malfuc, n-dHon talak." "fna mef raq, sru fenfden grāt nataX? dambic pin bindaq PN. "gaŋaX, pin bindaq: cār bindik panratfaŋ, day fanpsak binkawantik nataX ya pin grāt pi!" "qaruy šaX-kaft se caruŋ sen tapal panaw panaw." empsfŋim šaX pin kaft pin bindaq PN.'' | |||
=== Another one === |
Latest revision as of 01:57, 23 April 2023
Lexicon of Proto-Lakovic roots
Swadesh lists for the Lakovic languages
Lakovic languages/Sketchbook
Lakovic | |
---|---|
Created by | – |
Geographic distribution | Bjeheond, Talma, Etalocin, Txapoalli |
Linguistic classification | One of Hmøøh's primary language families |
Proto-language | Proto-Lakovic |
Subdivisions |
|
The Lakovic languages (/ləˈkoʊvɪk/ lə-KOH-vik; Naeng: fi imbrits Lăcof Bjeheondian: [vɪ (ʔ)ɪmˈbrits ləˈkaov]) are a major Hmøøhian language family, originally native to Bjeheond. The most populous members of the family are the Nakwax dialect continuum spoken in Txapoalli, the Æ language of northwest Taivíor, and the (usually mutually intelligible) vernaculars derived from Classical Tseer. The family is inspired by Semitic, Mon-Khmer and Austronesian languages.
The family is named after *lakof, the PLak reconstructed word for 'human'. *lakof is the etymon of Naeng Wen Lăchua '(poetic) Wen Dămea', Tseer lakow 'free', and several other ethnonyms of Lakovic-speaking peoples such as Dak'ox. Template:Windermere sidebar
Todo
Language with dissimilated reduplicated plurals/verbs
some confusion between derivational affixes and trigger/applicatives in Ashanic
an ergative Lakovic language
a Txapoallian Lakovic language with a possessed classifier system
A Dinka-like language
Urheimat
The Proto-Lakovic urheimat is thought to have been Bjeheond, based on the distribution of the family and reconstructed Proto-Lakovic vocabulary for Bjeheondian fauna and flora and Mediterranean-climate rainy winters and dry summers.
Proto-Lakovic culture
Phylogeny
Most scholars agree on the following major branches:
- Naengic (aka Ashanic)
- Tseeric
- Classical Tseer
- Modern Tseer
- Classical Tseer
- Häskä
- Shalaian
- Pfiunian dialect continuum (Pseudo-Swiss German)
- Txapoallian Lakovic
- Lakovic isolates:
Phonology
The reconstructed phonology of PLak
Consonants
Labial | Dental/Alveolar | Lateral | Palatal | Velar | Laryngeal | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nasal | *m /m/ | *n /n̪/ | *ŋ /ŋ/ | ||||
Plosive | voiceless | *p /p/ | *t /t̪/ | *k /k/ | *ʔ /ʔ/ | ||
voiced | *b /b/ | *d /d̪/ | *g /ɡ/ | ||||
implosive | *ƀ /ɓ/ | *đ /ɗ/ | |||||
Affricate | *c /t̪͡s̪/ | *ć /t͡ɬ/ | |||||
Fricative | *f /ɸ/ | *s /s̪/ | *ś /ɬ/ | *š /ʃ/ | *x /χ/ | *h /ɦ/ | |
Resonant | *w /w/ | *r /r/ | *l /l̪/ | *y /j/ |
The voiceless stops p t k ts tś were weakly aspirated like Japanese voiceless stops.
m n l r could be syllabic in unstressed affixes.
Vowels
i u e o ă a
ă is thought to have been short /a/ or /ɐ/ while a was long /aː/. a could not occur unstressed and regularly reduced to ă.
Phonotactics
Proto-Lakovic was dominated by CV or CVC syllables. Some prefixes and infixes resulted in CC- initials.
Proto-Lakovic morphology
Root structure
Roots consisted of a sequence of consonants plus an inherent vowel. There was schwebeablaut: the vowel could change position within the root. The roots could be of the form
- biconsonantal roots alternating between CVC and CCV. Example: sep ~ spe 'to walk'
- triconsonantal roots alternating between CCVC, CVCC, and CVCVC. Example: ptsun ~ putsn ~ putsun 'to live'
- 4-consonant roots like cpalg ~ cplag 'to cry out' (Wdm. tspong 'to demand' and tsloc 'to cry out')
Statistically, biconsonantal roots in Lakovic are somewhat more common than in Semitic; triconsonantal roots are derived from biconsonantals via root extensions. One example is *Hedn "being" and *Hdek "to inhabit", both derived from the root *Hed "to exist".
Various prefixes, infixes and suffixes were added to derive words. Some infixes had 2 allomorphs, either as an infix or as a prefix: C<əC>CVC or C-CVC/C-CVCC.
Three-consonant roots had 3 ablaut grades, traditionally called:
- Verbal grade: CCVC
- Nominal grade: CVCC
- Long nominal grade: CVCVC
The CVCC grade had some reflexes with either the first C assimilating into V or the second C (explain some words like muad, yar or -b, -d finals)
The long nominal grade first arose in Late Proto-Lakovic: the nominal grade CVCC turned to CVCVC when doing so epenthesized less "nice" consonant clusters. Then CVCVC became analyzed as a new ablaut grade.
Weak roots
Weak roots such as *yriš 'to think' and *săpQ 'to pull' have irregularities in their allomorphs, like weak roots in Semitic. The weak consonants are y, w, H, and Q.
With week roots, either the verbal stem (e.g. yriš > riš) or the nominal stem (sap' > sap 'to pull, to drag') or both are shortened, and either drops or assimilates the weak consonant. This leads to apparent irregularities like nominal yirš ~ verbal riš.
Nouns
Nouns were pluralized by total reduplication:
- lăkof 'person' > lăkof-lăkof 'people'
- lban 'water > lban-lban 'a lot of water'
Nouns had no morphological case; genitive noun phrases were formed by concatenation.
Naengic developed a new associative plural suffix -am, from PLak păm 'that; those (distal demonstrative)' (the -am in Modern Windermere plural pronouns łănam, ănam).
Pronouns
Most branches of Lakovic show evidence for the following PLak pronouns:
- *riH = I
- *băŋ = we (dual inclusive)
- *śen = thou
- *śens = thou (hon)
- *ʔin = s/he
- *ʔins = s/he (hon)
PLak had no plural pronouns; it made do with associative plurals or demonstratives instead.
Verbs and adjectives
Proto-Lakovic was a verb-heavy language: verbs contained enough information that a sentence could consist of just a verb, and context made sense of the meaning.
Verbs inflected for triggers, TAM, pluractionality, evidentiality, and gender agreement. Present-day Lakovic languages preserve these inflections to varying levels.
TAM
The following verb affixes marked lexical aspect and voice/transitivity/denominality.
- unmarked or li- = imperfective
- -H = perfective
- hem- = change of state for statives?
- various reduplifixes for other TAMs:
- F(M)ă- = iterative
- FaL- = intensive
- ⟨iL⟩, qol-⟨iL⟩- almost X, X a little
- săL- = inceptive
- HenFă- = frequentative
- tăFi- = graduative
- ongFă- = X for oneself, X in advance
- ⟨ăp⟩
- ⟨ăŋ⟩
- ⟨it⟩
- ⟨ăm/năm⟩
- ⟨ăg⟩
- ⟨kăm⟩
- ⟨lis⟩
Nominalization
The most common ways to form deverbal nouns were:
- Using the nominal grade CVCC of the root
- The ⟨ăy⟩ infix
- using instrument, place and agent affixes.
Derivational morphology
Schwebeablaut
Three-consonant roots had 3 ablaut grades, traditionally called:
- Verbal grade: CCVC
- Nominal grade: CVCC
- Long nominal grade: CVCVC
The distinction is best preserved in non-Talman Lakovic languages, and to an extent Naeng; the Talman ones went fast and loose with ablaut grades just like most branches of IE did.
Root extensions
There is much evidence that the truly basic roots were CVC~CCV roots, and CVCC~CCVC roots were derived from CVC~CCV via suffixing a third root consonant.
- ngit = to happen
- ngitw~ngtiw = new
Affixes
- ⟨-s⟩: honorific, nominalization
- Source of breathy voice ablaut in Wdm.
- ⟨r⟩ prefix or infix: non-volitional or passive verbs
- Ashanic *⟨àr⟩, Wdm. ⟨ră⟩, ⟨ngăr/măr⟩
- ⟨ăy⟩ = deverbal noun
- ⟨ong⟩ = place noun
- ⟨X⟩ = agentive or instrument
- Wdm root vowel breathiness
- ⟨ăf⟩ = verb forming prefix or infix
- Wdm initial voicing, sometimes also breathy root vowel
- bif- = agentive
- Wdm. pă- + voicing (not productive)
- Tseer ba-
- xă- = resultative (passive in Windermere)
- t- = intensive, denominals
- Wdm. th- or t- (not productive)
- Qu- = intensive
- Wdm. th-u-
- yă- = adjectivizer; from yă 'with'
- Wdm. yă-, Tseer xi-, Häskä yə-
- f- = negative; the opposite or undoing of X
- not productive in Wdm
- Tseer ø-
Proto-Lakovic syntax
Proto-Lakovic had unmarked word order VSO.
Triggers
- spe-f fit Qopr-is ŋă rif (walk-PFV IND height-FEM DIR 1SG) = I walked up high (neutral)
- s<əŋ>pe-f fit rif ŋă Qopris (<DEST>walk-PFV IND 1SG DIR high) = I walked up high (emphasis on "up high")
Copular sentences
Proto-Lakovic was zero-copula (different descendants use different etymologies for the copula).
This caused some triggers to be reinterpreted as noun-deriving affixes in some daughter languages. Demonstration by contrived example, with the instrument trigger:
- p⟨ăk⟩tuś fit rif fit Qin ŋă măXokis.
- ⟨INST⟩stab IND 1SG IND 3SG.M DIR stone-F
- I stabbed him with the stone.
was reinterpreted as something like "The stone was my stabbing-instrument [for piercing] him".
Copular sentences are zero-copula and do not use case markers except Hit: biHdaŋ Hit lakoF. = 'The person is a soldier/warrior.'
Some "adjectives" are actually prepositional phrases instead of verbs:
*Xu Qopr fit fedn Xtăr. (PRED high.NOM DIR creature black) 'The black one is up high.'
Sample text
The Round Table
**ŋift ntor mangār se dak kaft. "mef raq śen ʔam?" dambic pin bindaq PN. mi qangfnung katkfat nataX qemrecal sen Hdān: "šruk day qatsHiw: dak manknas, tap day amfuc ftom, liw qatsalfiw, tak malfuc, n-dHon talak." "fna mef raq, sru fenfden grāt nataX? dambic pin bindaq PN. "gaŋaX, pin bindaq: cār bindik panratfaŋ, day fanpsak binkawantik nataX ya pin grāt pi!" "qaruy šaX-kaft se caruŋ sen tapal panaw panaw." empsfŋim šaX pin kaft pin bindaq PN.